Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Vubiant
15 Apr 17 09:52
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Aug 04
| Topic/replies: 7,360 | Blogger: Vubiant's blog
Two issues intrigue me ...not yet seen any good explanation.

1)  When and why did photographic fashion change from subjects staring solemnly into the camera to (enforced !) smiling ?

2)  When and why did men eschew the wearing of caps and hats -which practice is ubiquitous as seen in old photographs up to about the 1950s ?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
By:
Clouseau
When: 15 Apr 17 10:04
imho

1) When it started photography was a rare phenomenon and people used to think they had to be on their best behaviour. They would have to make an appointment with the photographer and dress up in their finest.It wasn't a case of people taking snaps all the time.

When cameras became available to the hoi-polloi the sense of occasion was no longer relevant and it became a more natural process.

2) Rock and Roll... you can't show off your quiff with a flat cap.
By:
Vubiant
When: 15 Apr 17 10:12
Thanks clouseau. Both explanations sound plausible and would make  the change in both habits broadly contemporaneous - c. the early sixties.
The casualisation of life has proceeded apace since then...possibly a little  too much as some (including me) would see it.
By:
Foinavon
When: 15 Apr 17 10:19
Andy Capp even wears his flat cap in the bath tub.
By:
Vubiant
When: 15 Apr 17 10:49
Helps him to go with the Flo ?
By:
Foinavon
When: 15 Apr 17 10:52
Doesn't want to get his hair wet. Grin
By:
Ramruma
When: 15 Apr 17 13:19
In the very early days of photography, exposure times were very long so smiling was out along with any sort of movement.
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 15 Apr 17 13:50
It was also common to photograph deceased children posing as if they were alive.

Difficult to get them to grin much.
By:
Ramruma
When: 15 Apr 17 14:43
It was also common to photograph deceased children posing as if they were alive.

At first sight, that seems ghoulish but of course in most cases the families would not have had photos taken while the child was still alive.

A modern equivalent might be those requests on reddit or other social media for someone to photoshop out the breathing, infusion and catheter tubes from my child's last photo.
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 15 Apr 17 21:30
it took about five seconds to capture the image in victorian times. keep grinning? a static statue pose was required, and if you look at old films of workers from the twenties they were always larking about. They seemed more joyful than the people of today who need a skinful to get there.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com