Le Pen leading in 1st round...

Her to win the 1st round is my biggest bet of the year. France, Wake up and take your country back before it is too late. Vive Le Pen!

wat?  She's been ahead in the first round for months.

She has no possible chance in the second round however. Her price to be next President is ridiculous.

Dotchinite, Le Pen is almost certain to be in the final 2, which hardly gives her no possible chance. 4.6 will not look too shabby in a 2 horse race and the French might f**k up and not put Macron through, Melenchon is gaining popularity and could be a player. The price that I don't understand is Fillon at less than 6, how could he possibly win?

Le Résistance Against Globalism - Stefan Molyneux and Paul Watson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72EoWysfaHY

Make my hay, looks like Macron shaded it! 23.7 Macron 21.7 Le Pen

Trump predicting Le Pen
Obama the jinx, backing Macron


I know who my money is on.

I most certainly do, my Rangerlic friend

When is the result due?

Cheers

She's only gone and dunnit!

Ninnyhammers obliterated...

She's only gone and dunnit!

Ninnyhammers obliterated...

The exit polls are in line with the polls in the last couple of weeks: Macron 1st, Le Pen 2nd.

And good reading it makes. Just think Ramruma; ye could have saved yerself the walk from Racing..

Vive Le Penn!!!!

She's only ahead in one exit poll!

Vive Le Penn...

That prediction was from the Frog Interior Minister.....


Vive Le Penn!

12 of 107 departements counted so far and Le Penn in front.

Le Pen 22.78%

Macron 20.88%

The Next President price has been swinging about like a dong in a hurricane. Think Le Pen started the day at about 4.5, right?

With 22 of 107 departements counted Macron takes a sight lead.


Macron 22.34%

Le Pen 22.28%

Belgian Chocolat melting as i type..

Yes it's been a crazy market Patra, Le Pen did start the day at about 5 for the Next President.

it's going to be a long night and looks like I've probably lost my biggest bet of the year oh well., I'm going to have to go to bed soon got to get up early. If anyone wants to continue  with up-dates I've put the  link below.

Official first round latest

With 44 of 107 departements counted | At 23:05 CEST

Macron 23.46%

Le Pen 21.77%

Mélenchon 19.35%

Fillon 18.87%

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2017/apr/23/french-presiden...

The French elite (aka the EU fat cats) have the result they wanted.

Q'UELLE SURPRISE

They've already started on the 2nd vote. Urging the ones who didn't vote for them to not vote for Le Penn? Why do peeps take any notice of beaten and battered losers... It's their arrogance that gets me..

whats with all these anti fascists going around attacking the police - how does that work?

Some human tragedy was on Sky just now, ludicrously describing MLP as a 'fascist'.  The presenter inexplicably failed to challenge this extraordinary and outrageous allegation.

Juncker now congratulates Macron. This is the twot who wants to take legal action against Hungary..


The cooont should stick to making planes..

In truth, the French vote is pretty evenly split: almost a dead-heat for first, barely half a length in front of third and fourth. Perhaps the four of them should take it in turns to be president. One week on, three weeks off.

great idea, maybe we can brexit on odd years and be good europeans on even **** ....

dunno whats wrong with even years , maybe i hit a t instead of an r ?

Sensible French people would never allow Le Pen to run the country, nothing to see here people

Has someone left a jar of jam out???

SH, define sensible French people,!!!!, then provide proof of any kind, that you understand the French and their voting influences. Isn't this the ARROGANCE that led to other voters voting for brexit, and TRUMPERMAN.

FFS, have a real debate, do you even live in this country, doubt it so, what exactly is your problem. well wher'e waiting???

Well c'mon scanny lets have it.

is this the usual french scenario; voting for who they want in the first round and against who they don't want in the run-off?

current odds suggest it is.

carry on frothing.

Traditionally the French use the 1st round to air their grievances against the establishment, which is why Le Pen was favourite to get through. Macron is a big favourite now, having surprisingly won the 1st round, as it's more likely that the majority of the voters for the other main candidates will now vote for him.

Macron is a feckin midget! No chance of im winning unless Corsica invades..

Le Pen on offer at 7-1 for the guessers!

One hopes the racist Penn is defeated.

macron - rothschild banker - hollande's money man for 5 years and he is called a progressive- just a slightly different approach from what they had for 5 previous years

PROGRESSIVE  ha ha   - is he backed by all those rioting protestors too??  Wonderful to see those anti fascists on the streets attacking the police - very clever aren't they?? cough cough!!!!  More like fascists than fascists themselves. 
Their mantra - if you don't vote our way then we will smash you up.

here comes 'Bunter' on sky with the usual pro eu bias

wonder if they will mention the huge unemployment problem
or the staggering youth job situation

adam boulton - bunter  ha ha!!!

She's a protest vote at best, all elections are won from centre ground in countries like France, pipe dream for the nutters to think she'd win.

True.

ps
Macron - (on sky) being described as an organic movement - sounds like having a Sh!t  - and that about sums him up really.

You would have to be an idiot not to vote for Le Pen, don`t allow yourself to believe anything else.

26 points behind in the polls

Looks like Le Pen is extremely unlikely to get in. Thankfully the French voters will show themselves to be not as stupid as the British and American and another disaster can be avoided.

Yes anxious, Le Pen is an idealist and a romantic . She is like a teacher and a reminder of all that is good,
She seems unapproachable, a sort of goddess.
There is more to it than that of course.

A bit like her Dad ?

The French people are a bit afraid , and a bit not afraid .

getting to the final 2 has been a good result for le pen,she already said that her time will be in 5 years time when presumably the terrorist situation will have worsened & macron will not have been able to improve the economic malaise caused by eu stagnation.

Lots can change in 5 years but those who thought 3-1 this time around were fair odds clearly didnt understand French politics.

Lots can change in 2 weeks as well.

And don't get me started on polls...

What exactly is the 'organic movement' of macron going to do?

They describe it as organic - sounds like having a sh!t - bit like his policies. 
A progressive.  Ex Rothschild and 5 years with Hollande?  how does that work out as a progressive.
On sky they are talking him up as fast as they can go with 'Bunter' fronting it all.
Hardly anything good to say about pen and really not doing a critique on the progessive's policy.
Looks more like one step forward and 2 steps back.
What gets my goat is the lack of any proper analysis of policies and the avoidance of serious discussion of the policies and problems. ADULT UNEMPLOYMENT,THE HORRENDOUS YOUTH JOB SITUATION, IMMIGRATION and the M problem.

He's done nothing, knows nothing, can't promise anything, has no plans, and Le Pen will wipe him out in a debate.


7's is tooooooooo big..

Le Penn
on ur bucket list g2d ?

It's a big bucket, Cap'n..

driver2 - sadly you're right. Both Melenchon and Fillon have told their voters to back Macron in the second round next month, so it looks extremely unlikely that Le Pen will win.

Are these voters mere puppets, to do as they are told? I doubt it will be as straighforward as the media would have us believe.

Correctomundo.

As for driver. He said earlier that "4.6 will not look too shabby in a 2 horse race" and later says "Le Pen on offer at 7s for the guessers"

I've been doing it wrong all along..

lfc1971    24 Apr 17 10:25 
You would have to be an idiot not to vote for Le Pen


chit chat 2017

guinness2dear    24 Apr 17 22:57 
As for driver. He said earlier that "4.6 will not look too shabby in a 2 horse race"

you have, selectively and possibly typically, failed to apply context to this original statement.

What a contradictory eejit.

Have a look at your previous cherry picking..

please explain why you have taken driver's comment out of context

should be simple enough for someone as intelligent as you

And just to help the convo along...


you have, selectively and possibly typically, failed to apply context to this original statement.

should be simple enough for someone as intelligent as you

David Fishwick Minibus Sales    24 Apr 17 23:47
should be simple enough for someone as intelligent as you

guinness2dear    24 Apr 17 23:53 
It isn't.

i overestimated your intelligence (sarcastically or not)

guinness2dear    24 Apr 17 23:53
Now you explain why you took lfc's comment out of context you sniping twot..


i didn't -- proof of my overestimation (above)

You did; i know what he meant; you didn't. Overestimation of your intelligence metinks.

As you are the one who came on here and sniped at me (sarcastically or not) would you care to explain your behaviour?

guinness2dear    24 Apr 17 23:18
Have a look at your previous cherry picking..

until you provide proof of said cherry picking (go on then), this is merely an opinion and not fact.



oh, and calm down snowflake.

I'm very calm, snowflake. Now if you would, answer my question please..

i asked if you'd care to explain why you took driver's comment(s) out of context -- you wouldn't (because you did), or couldn't (because you did and don't have the capacity for reason)

my behaviour is on a reasoned level. i requested an explanation (re: you being selective in the use of somebody else's comments) but you refused to answer. you have since sought to divert/distract from my original request. it's a typical response and one i'm used to outwith online discussion.

I answered. More than you did, or can't or won't.


Your behaviour is on stalker level as you have given no reason for choosing to protect driver and snipe at me. Driver, i assume is big enough to look after himself? There is many posts and posters you could have chosen. Which means (just to help you) that you chose me in particular. You see, you "requested an explanation" which means you think you're superior to members of this Forum (online) as anyone can see. I have answered your snipes and just because i don't want to converse with you in detail (reasons above) i chose short answers to a sniper...

Now you in your mother superior role may see that as deflection; i can assure you it isn't. I just like brushing your snipes off my sleeve with a one or two word flick..

Maybe you're Alastair Campbell and just act superior all the time. Maybe you're just a sniping twot. Either way you chose me in particular. Maybe i should feel honoured (i am bowing) in your presence?

guinness2dear    25 Apr 17 00:35 
I answered. -- you didn't (still not explained why you selectively chose only part of his/her post).

More than you did, or can't or won't. -- your question was about behaviour, i replied.

Your behaviour is on stalker level -- it isn't. your opinion, not fact.

as you have given no reason for choosing to protect driver and snipe at me. -- i have done neither (your choice of the word "snipe" is your perception of this online discourse). you took his comments out of context -- you've still not answered why.

Driver, i assume is big enough to look after himself? -- I'm sure he/she is.

There is many posts and posters you could have chosen. Which means (just to help you) that you chose me in particular. -- you've misrepresented another poster's comments. simply, why?

You see, you "requested an explanation" which means you think you're superior to members of this Forum (online) as anyone can see. I have answered your snipes and just because i don't want to converse with you in detail (reasons above) i chose short answers to a sniper... -- i don't; can they?; you haven't; i am not.

Now you in your mother superior role may see that as deflection; i can assure you it isn't. I just like brushing your snipes off my sleeve with a one or two word flick.. -- genius or waffle

Maybe you're Alastair Campbell and just act superior all the time. Maybe you're just a sniping twot. Either way you chose me in particular. Maybe i should feel honoured (i am bowing) in your presence? -- neither Campbell nor sniping

Well at least you agree you're a twot.

I did answer your question mother. Just because you don't like the answer means nothing. And i explained why it was short which imo was more than you deserve.

As previously stated by my good and simple self. There are many posts and posters you could have chosen (i'm sure a superior being like yerself, Alastair could find fault with many) you chose MINE I have been stalked by many these last months and you're just another; or maybe just another guise. Whether you deny it or not is immaterial to me. You post exactly like 2 others on here.

If i picked unfairly (i didn't just to help) on driver then it's up to him to respond, not you mother. This is a Forum not a day care centre. No one ever intervenes on my behalf and nor would i want them to.. I don't care how superior you think you are, you're not. You're just a condescending twot.

I have proven you sniped; just because you don't like it means nothing. And you still could be Campbell, or maybe you carry his bag?

I don't think i've typed 5 words to you in all the time i've been on here so your snipes to me tonight for no apparent reason other than your superiority complex; tells me all i need to know.

Well of course there's always this to remind us all...


you have, selectively and possibly typically, failed to apply context to this original statement.

This implies you know how i post. It also reminds me of recently when it was said to me on here by someone else; or maybe not eh. Selectively is a great word; you should practice what you preach, mother. Maybe you can explain it's true meaning to your liturgy this coming Sunday?

guinness2dear    25 Apr 17 01:56
my simple self

you have proved nothing other than a willingness to hurl insults (the last resort and indicator of failure in debate)

intentionally ignoring context and not addressing a direct question as to why is in no way an answer (it's impossible to dislike what doesn't exist).

surely, you understood the quite explicit use of "possibly"?

Hurl insults? Now that does make me laugh. My hound could hurl them better than i have tonight. But if ye fancy some proper insults, you child, i will gladly hurl some when i've got the time or inclination..

Everything i have said about you is true (have a look in the mirror, mother) You are a condescending prat who thinks he is superior to your average Joe. It's written and smells all over your posts. What gives you that impression is beyond me. Maybe you were spoilt as a child? Dropped on yer napper? Who knows. All i know is you couldn't have had a decent education as thy ended up in Burnley selling used cars. Tut.

Now for the last time mother; i answered your question!!! Unlike you with mine. I understand "possibly and typically (i think you forgot that one)" in this particular context, as a sarcastic remark said to try and get a rise out of my good self (someone been teaching you) You will have to report back and tell them you failed miserably..

Oh btw; your last answer was cherry picked as well. You really need to improve your sniping. As at the moment, you are behind crabs. Now that's embarrassing..