Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
28 Mar 17
17:32
Joined:
Date Joined:
27 May 11
never mind brexit or indyref2 they are more interested in the legs of two 50+ year old women 
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 21
|
By:
what is your point
who would want to read that rag it is no better than the guardian |
|
By:
It probably is tbf, though I read neither.
|
|
By:
nicky is 46 ya filthy Sassenach scandi
|
|
By:
did you,the libtards,screeching feminists etc go into meltown when the media put together photo,s and described trump meeting boris as a meeting of the hair pieces,or potrayed george osbourne trying to morph into bradley wiggins,or attacked the appearence,demeanour of corbyn,milliband
i see some public body are handed out awards to black footballers,why arnt the libtards out in force calling this racist against white footballers,imo only white footballers should no be put forward for footballer of the years,its just like the black music awards imagine the meltdown if we had the white music awards |
|
By:
Women have legs!!!!??
That'll surprise some people. I thought they got about on springs like Zebedee |
|
By:
|
|
By:
the editor needs to have a word with himself imo, depraved older man, a 20 something would be thinking WTF, reminds me of someone on sky breakfast a few months ago swooning of thersa may
 |
|
By:
1st time
use not allowed to say that!!! It is not on the agenda. Consider you have been yellow carded. A terry bull offence. In fact I am offended on behalf of all those offended. Or up ended even. |
|
By:
Hey moisok!! no fair, I got a straight red, I'm appealing, but according to some, not very
 |
|
By:
It was a poor choice for front page presentation,trivia that demeaned the Mail. It was just as bad as the endless rubbish about Trump and his hair,etc.
|
|
By:
wee nicki looked more tanned than ghostly theresa.
|
|
By:
Can the Daily Mail actually be demeaned ?
Could this be even possible !!! |
|
By:
Do you really think they distort the truth more than the Guardian, facts? I honestly don't know, but the propaganda from the Guardian is beyond laughable, which is probably why they need a begging bowl to continue spewing it out.
|
|
By:
The guardian used to be a more radical paper now it has become establishment.
|
|
By:
The Guardian is just a poor substitute for toilet paper.
|
|
By:
Ye Gods, are people pretending to be offended by two women (of their own free will) exposing generous expanses of leg (knowing it would attract male attention), and a newspaper commenting on it?
Perhaps the Professional Offence Takers would prefer that women were required to wear the burqa and full veil, and subjected to male violence if they didn't? Well done to Mistress Theresa and a rare congrats to Mrs Sturgeon for their exemplary dress code. |
|
By:
Yet another reason for the permanently outraged to pour their holier than thou nonsense over social media.
What must it be like to live with these people. I think I read the PM said it was of no concern to here ......that will have keyboard warriors seething as well no doubt. |
|
By:
she had to say that they're on the tory's side.
|
|
By:
two decent pair of pins imo
TM got the length but NS nudges it with the torque |
|
By:
They're not offended, not because they are not offended but because it is politically astute not to be so. Several politicians across all parties had it right. It is outdated, irrelevant and frankly vacuous. Anyone old enough to remember Reveille
 . |
|
By:
when you,ve had umpteen paid advisors ,advising you on what to wear,how to sit,pose etc why would you complain,after all the time and money that goes into their appearence and posture ther,d be uproar from the 2 women and their advisors if there appearence had gone unmentioned,personaly just relieved that jimmy krankie took the cap off
|