We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Are you a Harry or a William?
Show More
No it's not Scandi, sorry.
Hang about though and BITO might put one up for you.
(No pun intended)
Hang about though and BITO might put one up for you.
(No pun intended)
Straight as a dye here aka but thanks for your interest
Hovering around other peeps chit all day is only for some seriously demented flying chitmobile IMHO...
Your post at 10:13 was hardly that of a comedic genuis, look at me I can add a letter to make another word
By the way aka, that term is a derogatory word used to describe people of a certain sexuality, doesn't surprised me though.
By the way aka, that term is a derogatory word used to describe people of a certain sexuality, doesn't surprised me though.
Away and report someone Scandi.
Or should I say buzz off.
Or should I say buzz off.
Aren't flies cross-eyed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR2ypsw-GKM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR2ypsw-GKM
Are you a Harry or a William?
At first I thought this was a sectarian thread, then a gay thread, now I'm just unsure.
At first I thought this was a sectarian thread, then a gay thread, now I'm just unsure.
Neither, the royal family make me want to puke. They make The Simpsons appear normal. Hate them all, utter ponces.
try wearing that red jacket with gold trim in the Barras, Glasgow.
Agree the Royal Family are leeches.
aka, I have 4-5 posts removed every day (Brian Cox openly admits he's spent 4 months solid trying to get me banned, and has succeeded in getting serveral others banned) so it's not me doing the reporting, but if you keep on saying you might just convince 1 person outside of your band of right wing brothers on here that it's true. At the minute you are preaching to the converted.
aka, I have 4-5 posts removed every day (Brian Cox openly admits he's spent 4 months solid trying to get me banned, and has succeeded in getting serveral others banned) so it's not me doing the reporting, but if you keep on saying you might just convince 1 person outside of your band of right wing brothers on here that it's true. At the minute you are preaching to the converted.
sh, you and I have disagreed many times over many different subjects, I could call you many things (and have done in the past) but one thing I could never call you is a 'Grass' (to use the colloquial expression)
You had every oppertunity to report me and at one stage even get me bannnded, you did neither, fair play to you.
Looking forward to disagreeing with you soon.
You had every oppertunity to report me and at one stage even get me bannnded, you did neither, fair play to you.
Looking forward to disagreeing with you soon.
I like a debate on things that matter, but you are right, I have never reported anyone, there is a moderator on here who posts (think it was sterwerty who mentioned this) - he knows I don't report anyone.
Welcome back btw
Welcome back btw
scandanavian_haven
Agree the Royal Family are leeches
That remark shows an ignorance of the funding of the Royal Family Scandi.
The Queen receives over £200m income from her estate. The vast majority of this is handed over to the treasury.
The extended Royal Family receive nothing from the country.
Agree the Royal Family are leeches
That remark shows an ignorance of the funding of the Royal Family Scandi.
The Queen receives over £200m income from her estate. The vast majority of this is handed over to the treasury.
The extended Royal Family receive nothing from the country.
'Welcome back btwGrin) Thanks sh,.......... let battle commence,
The Royal Family cost the UK £334 million pounds a year aka, and ..how much does the Queen owe in Bedroom tax ?
Recent research valued the Monarchy’s latest contribution to the economy at £1.155bn, but counter-research claims the Royals cost the tax payer £344m
Loulla-Mae Eleftheriou-Smith Tuesday 8 September 2015 13:25 BST62 comments
Click to follow
The Independent Online
queen-elizabeth-18.jpg
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge laughs as Queen Elizabeth gestures during a visit to Vernon Park in Nottingham, 2012
As the Queen reaches a new milestone of becoming the UK’s longest reigning monarch, the question of her worth to Britain’s economy has once again been raised.
According to fresh research by Brand Finance, the value of the monarchy has been placed at an estimated £56.7 billion. This figure includes the value of tangible assets such as the Crown Estate, the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster and the Crown Jewels.
Queen Elizabeth II: Life in pictures
50
show all
When these tangible assets are stripped out, the total value of the monarchy to the UK’s economy is an estimated £1.155 billion for 2015, according to their research.
This figure has been calculated by netting off costs such as the Sovereign Grant, the millions spent on security and the maintenance of the palaces against sources of income such as the surplus generated by the Crown Estate, the uplift in tourism and the price premium from brands carrying Royal Warrants.
Brand-finance-value-monarchy.jpg
Band Finance's table of revenue and costs attributed to the monarchy in 2015
However, Brand Finance attributes £152 million in income to the “Kate Effect”, which is described as an “uplift to fashion and other brands worn, used or otherwise endorsed”. Similarly £101 million is attributed to the “Charlotte Effect” and £76 million to the “George Effect,” while a total of £114 million has been calculated as the “Estimated value of PR”. Brand Finance has not yet responded to how these figures were estimated from total sales.
Supporters of the monarchy and its value to the UK often use the example of tourism as an area where the Royals haul in money. Brand Finance’s calculations show that tourism revenue connected to the monarchy and its heritage has been valued at £535 million for 2015.
Royal-wedding.jpg
Westminster Abbey, where Kate and William were married, is a hot tourist spot
But the UK’s tourism body VisitBritain states that while international tourism is Britain’s third largest service export, with inbound tourism to Britain worth £26.2 billion, only some of that figure can be attributed to attractions and events with a connection to British monarchs and heritage. These are sites such as the Tower of London, Buckingham Palace and Westminster Abbey, where the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were married, though no exact figure can be gauged of the contribution of the royals on tourism revenues.
“While having a royal family gets us an enormous amount of global coverage and free advertising for Britain across the world - which is invaluable - it’s not something we can give give an exact economic figure for,” said Patricia Yates, director of strategy and communications at VisitBritain.
Prince-George.jpg
The "George Effect" is estimated to have brought in £76m to the UK economy
Campaign group Republic, which calls for the abolition of the monarchy, claims that it’s own research shows the monarchy costs the UK £334 million a year, with each “working royal” costing the taxpayer £18.5 million a piece.
Republic rejects the inclusion of surplus from the Crown Estate as a source of revenue as it is a property investment vehicle managed, not owned, by the Queen during her reign as monarch on behalf of the nation.
It instead claims that costs from a number of sources including the Sovereign Grant, costs to local councils, costs from security and losses incurred by the private estates of the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall amount to £333.9 million.
READ MORE
Eight facts about the Queen you probably didn't know
The murky tale of Queen and the Loch Ness monster
David Starkey: The Queen has 'done and said nothing that anybody will remember'
“There isn’t any evidence to suggest there is any economic benefit to the royal family,” Republic chief executive Graham Smith said.
“Any benefit mentioned is from assets that belong to the nation - like tourist attractions - which would still belong to the nation if the monarchy was abolished.”
Loulla-Mae Eleftheriou-Smith Tuesday 8 September 2015 13:25 BST62 comments
Click to follow
The Independent Online
queen-elizabeth-18.jpg
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge laughs as Queen Elizabeth gestures during a visit to Vernon Park in Nottingham, 2012
As the Queen reaches a new milestone of becoming the UK’s longest reigning monarch, the question of her worth to Britain’s economy has once again been raised.
According to fresh research by Brand Finance, the value of the monarchy has been placed at an estimated £56.7 billion. This figure includes the value of tangible assets such as the Crown Estate, the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster and the Crown Jewels.
Queen Elizabeth II: Life in pictures
50
show all
When these tangible assets are stripped out, the total value of the monarchy to the UK’s economy is an estimated £1.155 billion for 2015, according to their research.
This figure has been calculated by netting off costs such as the Sovereign Grant, the millions spent on security and the maintenance of the palaces against sources of income such as the surplus generated by the Crown Estate, the uplift in tourism and the price premium from brands carrying Royal Warrants.
Brand-finance-value-monarchy.jpg
Band Finance's table of revenue and costs attributed to the monarchy in 2015
However, Brand Finance attributes £152 million in income to the “Kate Effect”, which is described as an “uplift to fashion and other brands worn, used or otherwise endorsed”. Similarly £101 million is attributed to the “Charlotte Effect” and £76 million to the “George Effect,” while a total of £114 million has been calculated as the “Estimated value of PR”. Brand Finance has not yet responded to how these figures were estimated from total sales.
Supporters of the monarchy and its value to the UK often use the example of tourism as an area where the Royals haul in money. Brand Finance’s calculations show that tourism revenue connected to the monarchy and its heritage has been valued at £535 million for 2015.
Royal-wedding.jpg
Westminster Abbey, where Kate and William were married, is a hot tourist spot
But the UK’s tourism body VisitBritain states that while international tourism is Britain’s third largest service export, with inbound tourism to Britain worth £26.2 billion, only some of that figure can be attributed to attractions and events with a connection to British monarchs and heritage. These are sites such as the Tower of London, Buckingham Palace and Westminster Abbey, where the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were married, though no exact figure can be gauged of the contribution of the royals on tourism revenues.
“While having a royal family gets us an enormous amount of global coverage and free advertising for Britain across the world - which is invaluable - it’s not something we can give give an exact economic figure for,” said Patricia Yates, director of strategy and communications at VisitBritain.
Prince-George.jpg
The "George Effect" is estimated to have brought in £76m to the UK economy
Campaign group Republic, which calls for the abolition of the monarchy, claims that it’s own research shows the monarchy costs the UK £334 million a year, with each “working royal” costing the taxpayer £18.5 million a piece.
Republic rejects the inclusion of surplus from the Crown Estate as a source of revenue as it is a property investment vehicle managed, not owned, by the Queen during her reign as monarch on behalf of the nation.
It instead claims that costs from a number of sources including the Sovereign Grant, costs to local councils, costs from security and losses incurred by the private estates of the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall amount to £333.9 million.
READ MORE
Eight facts about the Queen you probably didn't know
The murky tale of Queen and the Loch Ness monster
David Starkey: The Queen has 'done and said nothing that anybody will remember'
“There isn’t any evidence to suggest there is any economic benefit to the royal family,” Republic chief executive Graham Smith said.
“Any benefit mentioned is from assets that belong to the nation - like tourist attractions - which would still belong to the nation if the monarchy was abolished.”
Those figures are a nonsense Scandi.
These figs are ac few years old but haven't changed dramatically.
The Royal estate earnings were £240m.
Of this the Queen retained £36m with the £204m balance going to the treasury. (It's a fixed 15%)
There are other payments totalling £16m from the civil list but the extended family get nothing from the state.
Excluded from this is security which is hefty but no way is the quoted figure £334m anywhere near accurate.
These figs are ac few years old but haven't changed dramatically.
The Royal estate earnings were £240m.
Of this the Queen retained £36m with the £204m balance going to the treasury. (It's a fixed 15%)
There are other payments totalling £16m from the civil list but the extended family get nothing from the state.
Excluded from this is security which is hefty but no way is the quoted figure £334m anywhere near accurate.
No but I was gonna recommend the Argyle House Restaurant at Ibrox for you and your partner.
Lovely place and you might even get a wee sing song going.
Lovely place and you might even get a wee sing song going.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539