We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
Good.
|
|
By:
Football player on 100k a week gets caught speeding, gets fined £2500. (about half an hours work)
Normal Joe gets caught speeding, gets fined 3 weeks wages. The thinking is correct to hammer people for speeding but it will effect those on lower wages as per usual |
|
By:
Well normal Joe will just have to make sure he/she doesn't do 41mph or above in a 20mph zone. It isn't difficult.
|
|
By:
Should read normal joe near 2 weeks wages not 3
|
|
By:
Totally missing the point diva, it isn't difficult to understand how unfair it is.
As said before though, the thinking behind it is correct. Wouldn't it be fairer to just have a blanket 1.75 x weekly wage rather than capping it at 2.5k though? £2500 not much of a deterrent for anyone on over 50k a week. |
|
By:
Oh, yes. I see your point. Sorry.
I do tend to go off on one when it comes to speeding. |
|
By:
If you were unemployed and got caught breaking into someones house you'd probably pay a lot less, how is that proportional to the crime?
|
|
By:
Less chance of killing someone by breaking into their house than hitting them with a car at
40 miles per hour. Plus house breakers more likely to get the jail than a fine. If anything, the speeding drivers should get heavier punishments than they do |
|
By:
Tell that to someone that has had there's or a releatives house broken into and suffered a heart attack because of it. No condoning speeding but the fines imo are based on ability to pay, motorists being an easy target.
|
|
By:
their's ffs
|
|
By:
Not saying 1 is worse than the other but it is a fact that more people die due to speeding drivers
than house breakers. Similar to yourself, that isn't condoning housebreakers. Fwiw I've never heard of anyone getting a fine for breaking into a house. It's usually jail or community work etc Fines are far more common in traffic offences It's a bit of a poor argument tbf |
|
By:
According to the guidelines you can get fined but as burglers generally dont have any money they usually do community sevice or time as you said. Maybe a wrong choice to put my point across but I still stand by that the motorist is an easy target and as someone pointed out earlier the fines for the richer are not enough to deter. Maybe ban people for longer for the more serious offences with no leniency and they just might think twice if there going to get 5 years instead of 1.
|