Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
mememe
13 Feb 17 20:27
Joined:
Date Joined: 21 Jan 11
| Topic/replies: 2,767 | Blogger: mememe's blog
Time for a heated debate.

I'm Republican.
Because I, and my children, can never be the monarch, no matter clever we might be and how hard we try.
But we're supposed to live in a democracy.
Send 'em back to Europe, I say.
No fence sitters, please.
Pause Switch to Standard View Right, are you a Republican or a...
Show More
Loading...
Report trilby22 February 13, 2017 9:06 PM GMT
British and proud.
Report flushgordon1 February 13, 2017 9:13 PM GMT
God save the jelly bean.
Report Crisp77 February 13, 2017 9:17 PM GMT
Only one queen in my house.
Report flushgordon1 February 13, 2017 9:23 PM GMT
You can't say that anymore ,you are a person with an alternative lifestyle.
Report trilby22 February 13, 2017 9:33 PM GMT
Lol, there was a talk show on Radio Scotland this morning about LGBT & poofs in football.

One of the "experts" was rabbiting on about "alternative lifestyles", in that cyclists were being discriminated against for driving their bikes around central London.

I laughed ... LOUDLY!
Report trilby22 February 13, 2017 9:40 PM GMT
Apparently, there's a new medical excuse for lazy people.

Can't quite recall the term but it should come back to me.

That made me HOWL with laughter this morning.
Report scandanavian_haven February 13, 2017 9:48 PM GMT
There is no such thing as a Royalist, just submissive dorks.
Report trilby22 February 13, 2017 10:04 PM GMT
There's no Submission in this here neighbourhood, S_H!
Report akabula February 13, 2017 10:49 PM GMT
Royalist and proud. What I like most about the Monarchy is how many republican noses they get up.
Report donny osmond February 13, 2017 11:41 PM GMT
the queen does ok for us brits, i'm not sure a president could be so popular
whilst we have a prime minister in place

the middletons probably never thought their daughter would be a princess

what about charles though, would he be so popular ?


dont know, i'll vote for monarcy, but may change in a few years
Report Capt__F February 13, 2017 11:53 PM GMT
like Harry to get the gig
Report akabula February 14, 2017 12:00 AM GMT
I think Charles will be sidestepped.
Always comes across as an okay guy on the tv but has never moved with the times.
Report lfc1971 February 14, 2017 12:13 AM GMT
I am a Royalist and would like to see parliament closed down.
parliamentary democracy is impossible in the modern world because
it is multicultural, I disagree with that, what has anyone in common
with anyone else in Britain ? I don't know.
Report Wallflower February 14, 2017 12:16 AM GMT
Republican - nobody's subject.

Ludicrous concept in this day and age. Monarchy doesn't bother me, just bores me silly, ignore it.
Report lfc1971 February 14, 2017 12:16 AM GMT
democracy is simply another form of dictatorship if you are living in the wrong country.
Report lfc1971 February 14, 2017 12:19 AM GMT
its easier to remove a King than it is to remove a democracy
Report lfc1971 February 14, 2017 12:25 AM GMT
if democracies last too long they become tyrannies, and there is no where to escape from them.
Report lfc1971 February 14, 2017 12:27 AM GMT
i would like Britain to have a monarchy, with an aristocracy and noble knights and lords.
Report crystalhunt February 14, 2017 12:31 AM GMT
You been drinking again Sad
Report Mighty Whites 2008 February 14, 2017 1:59 PM GMT
‘A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.

“The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from dependence back into bondage.”
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:09 PM GMT
Pervert !
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:09 PM GMT
Laugh
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:10 PM GMT
(Leeds going up this year Happy )
Report Crisp77 February 14, 2017 2:13 PM GMT
Does he sell bread to the players?
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:15 PM GMT
Only fillet stake for our lads !
Report Jack Hacksaw February 14, 2017 2:16 PM GMT
I'd say that in the UK the Monarchy is a perfectly satisfactory situation.

Stability without any power.

Much more palatable than most other forms of government.

The only benefit imo of getting rid of the monarchy is that we could get rid of the link between Church and State and tell ALL the religions to do one.
Report mememe February 14, 2017 2:24 PM GMT
Jack, agree with the religion bit but I don't like the privilege and class stuff around the monarchy.

We need a true meritocracy where I can be king, imo.
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:31 PM GMT
Republican.....the whole class system, as proped up by the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas, is a massive drain on the UK.
Report sixtwosix February 14, 2017 2:32 PM GMT
My missus who loves ancestry and family trees had a look at my bloodline and very quickly found barons , and viscounts ....leading back to John Of Gaunt , son of Edward III.

I now like the family to call me his lordship , bloody peasants.
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:35 PM GMT
Trouble is there are 30 million who can say the same......I may be related to Kate.....Duchess of Cambridge....need to do some more research.
Report Jack Hacksaw February 14, 2017 2:37 PM GMT
Class is being replaced by new money, footballers and celebrities.

Getting rid of the monarchy wouldn't make much difference.
Report sixtwosix February 14, 2017 2:39 PM GMT
Of more importance to me , is that I am related to Ada Lovelace , who worked with Charles Babbage and is often described as the worlds first computer programmer .......my own occupation for 3 decades .Cool
Report Jack Hacksaw February 14, 2017 2:41 PM GMT
Related to Jon Gaunt, the radio presenter?

Really?
Report mememe February 14, 2017 2:47 PM GMT
Leppie

FFS you've agreed with me.  It's a trick, but I'll be watching you from now on.
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:51 PM GMT
Thepeerage.com.....interesting website
Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:58 PM GMT

Feb 14, 2017 -- 2:39PM, sixtwosix wrote:


Of more importance to me , is that I am related to Ada Lovelace , who worked with Charles Babbage and is often described as the worlds first computer programmer .......my own occupation for 3 decades .


Yes interesting young woman :

Augusta Ada King-Noel, Countess of Lovelace (née Byron; 10 December 1815 – 27 November 1852) (aged 36) was an English mathematician and writer, chiefly known for her work on Charles Babbage's proposed mechanical general-purpose computer, the Analytical Engine.

She was the first to recognise that the machine had applications beyond pure calculation, and created the first algorithm intended to be carried out by such a machine.

As a result, she is often regarded as the first to recognise the full potential of a "computing machine" and the first computer programmer.[1][2][3]
Ada Lovelace was the only legitimate child of the poet George, Lord Byron, and his wife Anne Isabella Milbanke ("Annabella"), Lady Wentworth.[4]

All Byron's other children were born out of wedlock to other women.[5] Byron separated from his wife a month after Ada was born and left England forever four months later, eventually dying of disease in the Greek War of Independence when Ada was eight years old.

Her mother remained bitter towards Lord Byron and promoted Ada's interest in mathematics and logic in an effort to prevent her from developing what she saw as the insanity seen in her father, but Ada remained interested in him despite this (and was, upon her eventual death, buried next to him at her request).

Often ill, she spent most of her childhood sick. Ada married William King in 1835. King was made Earl of Lovelace in 1838, and she became Countess of Lovelace.

Report The Leopard February 14, 2017 2:59 PM GMT
Saw a TV prog on her...looked her up on Wiki at the time.
Report CLYDEBANK29 February 14, 2017 4:00 PM GMT
The idea of bowing to a monarch makes me want to vomit.  But I think I'm in favour of a bit of history, and a powerless Head Of State rather than a BS President and accompanying cronyism.

Reckon they need watering down a bit though.  No need for the likes of Prince Michael of Kent ffs.  King/Queen their kids and then it ends for me.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com