The Superb Andrew Neil re Trump

is it this one ...


Andrew Neil has effortlessly exposed hypocrisy around Katie Hopkins’ support for Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump in an interviewing masterclass on BBC’s ‘Daily Politics’.

Neil prised apart Hopkins’ argument that the US billionaire had shown “true leadership” in proposing a ban on Muslims entering the United States, by getting the Mail Online columnist to admit she didn’t actually support Trump’s controversial plan.

The veteran interviewer also took on Hopkins’ claims of BBC bias and revealed that her views around Britain’s Muslim population appeared not to be based on any facts.

He was made to look very average today by Sebastian Gorka on the Sunday Politics.

What a shower the Labour Party have become under Corbyn.  Imbeciles and Trotskyists

In that one interview is all you need to know about why you should never vote for Corbyn.

Hopkins showed herself up for what she is. Screetching like an old hag who has ran out of **** and has to wait for the giro to get her next fix.

Just listen to this seething idiot...what a total tool

Any sane person takes no notice of what Katie Hopkins says.  Everything is for effect to boost her image.

What are you laughing at numbnuts?...stop using up useful space on this thread

Katie speaks for the right minded people of this country which obviously dosen't apply to you two idiots

Yep, would agree Clydebank29.

Yep, would agree Clydebank29. glad you added the 29 because no one would have known who you were referring to

Healey not got a clue and praising Jeremy for his stance.
The same Jeremy who calls terrorists his friends.

No idea why Katie is mentioned here.

Has anyone watched this link??

Just when I thought the Beeb were sinking into their sychophantic anti Trump abyss, Neil comes to the rescue.

They always go off on a tangent to deflect from issue.

just guessing as i dont open youtube links

is it not the one about katie hopkins , ah well at least
katie got some more publicity

she will be pleased

Yes Injera. it sums up the Corbyn Leadership perfectly.

The proposal to ban/postpone Trumps visit is the most ridiculous proposal I've ever come across from a politician.  Mayor of Toytown  would be too demanding a position for him.

Loved TMs put down of him in parliament.
"You lead a protest and I lead a country"

I have visions of Hilary Benn as the evil cunning puppeteer with his hands up the back of the hapless Corbyn and Abbott.

I love this.

Rees Mogg

.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEZK6dnib3U

donny osmond    05 Feb 17 19:54 
just guessing as i dont open youtube links

is it not the one about katie hopkins , ah well at least
katie got some more publicity

she will be pleased




Worthy of Flabbot that was, donny. 

we know chit chat love diane, but nice of you to give her
a mention

katie will be jealouus

Katie's just a bit gobby, Flabbot is one of the few people who actually make my skin crawl. John Redwood was another, not sure if he's still at it.

your name calling rather lets down any point you wish to make

Yes Redwood still an MP.
Katies like marmite.

or get back to the post of the op.


Tangent alert.

Redwood is a total clown with his bonkers right wing ideas , and Hopkins is a perfect example of Thatcher and Murdoch Spiv culture loud , brainless and obsessed with money

How would you describe the lovely Diane?

Has some strange ideas and some behavioural disorders , not cabinet quality.

Inarticulate? Struggles badly in interviews.
Brainless? Lacks basic knowledge of most labour policies.
Obsessed with money? Headache? Didn't need to resign and lose the extra dosh albeit for only a few months.
Racist? Certainly close to the mark at times.

The main difference of course is that Kate aint up for election and Diane wants to run the country.
Rarely listen to or read Kates utterances as she goes out of her way to provoke whilst Diane just does that naturally.

Andrew Neil although a very good interviewer cannot help having sly digs at anything to do with Labour , lets himself down badly with that sort of stuff , as for his earlier career with Murdoch the less said the better

Shadow Secretary , you would think he'd have been able to handle Andrew but he failed miserably.

If only he had worked for the guardian.

But he didn't, did he?
None of them ever did.

No digs at Labour, just genuine questions targetting the hypocrisy of the anti trump protesters.

By all means protest at Trump but at least have the decency to oppose the permanent 16 countrywide ban on Israelis!!

Questioning labour lies is now a dig.

what does it have to do with israel ?

LOL Yeah but no but yeah but no but... can we just deflect the subject so we don't have to analyse our own hypocrisy because we want a free world that gives equal validity to all people and all religions and we are responsible for fooking up the world and we might have developed universal suffrage but their society has equal validity to ours and although they treat women differently and with contempt they have their own culture and that aspect might be bad but they are from a different culture which must be respected and their philosphy is that they must conquer the world but let's get things into perspective, my dad is paying for my education so I have a right to protest and this seems a cool thing to do at the moment because we are all doing it and Trump's a C. U.N.T

akabula    05 Feb 17 21:08 

Katies like marmite.



You mean thick and pasty and looks like shlt

I tend not to look to closely at her.
BTW she's probably making a fortune out of being controversial.
The general public love that sort of thing.

very attractive woman in the flesh

believe me

you would