We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
The UN Security Council is to hold a vote tomorrow to try to get agreement on a possible Draft Resolution on the monitoring of the City's evacuation.
Is this any better than doing nothing? No wonder the people have lost hope!
Is this any better than doing nothing? No wonder the people have lost hope!
Show More
The UN do not have a lot of power...
Assad backed by the Russians, wants one thing to take Aleppo
The West supporting the rebels wishes to stop him...
This takes priority I am afraid..
I hope all civilians can be evacuated myself
Assad backed by the Russians, wants one thing to take Aleppo
The West supporting the rebels wishes to stop him...
This takes priority I am afraid..
I hope all civilians can be evacuated myself
War tends to take priority over civilian casualties, and most countries only abide by UN resolutions
when it suits them.
when it suits them.
The UN does do very good work. This is in the area of trying to help the victims of war, famine, etc.
It tries to educate poorer countries to make them more efficient.
It also warns us when atrocities start happening, they were the first to warn us of ISIS, and now in Aleppo of course.
But they cannot control powerful counties or their policies. They have no army of their own.
The United Nations was a good idea but has only ever worked on the humanitarian side.
My own opinion.
It tries to educate poorer countries to make them more efficient.
It also warns us when atrocities start happening, they were the first to warn us of ISIS, and now in Aleppo of course.
But they cannot control powerful counties or their policies. They have no army of their own.
The United Nations was a good idea but has only ever worked on the humanitarian side.
My own opinion.
nothing more than a talking shop
Srebrenica was on european soil and they didn't stop that
merry xmas anyway dessy
Srebrenica was on european soil and they didn't stop that
merry xmas anyway dessy
The blue helmeted Dutch soldiers actually handed people over to be killed during that conflict, Burt.
Im confused why Syria is headline news in the uk, there are plenty of other wars going on.
Muslims will kill each other (and anyone else tbf) whether other nations intervene or not, it is their way. Hindsight tells me we should just leave em to it.
They have just started to do that here. Only a few so far and a few beaten up.
up until now they have been reporting 'on aleppo' whilst cowering in Turkey
I'd hazard a guess that a lot of the info. is coming from Al Jazeeera which is funded by the ruling family of Qatar who have been in turn funding and arming the rebels for several years now.
I read that they are not any reporters in Syria (cant blame them)
So the news is open to sponsorship ?
So the news is open to sponsorship ?
250,000 facing Armaggeddon then 150k then 50 then 'thousands' - it was pure propaganda - just one example -
jihaddis holding civilians hostage - not letting them go so they end up getting involved and killed by assad's lot
just another example not reported
the jihaddis attacked a few weeks ago a 'rebel' offensive which killed civilians - not much about that!!
the west really started screaming about this latest assault on aleppo(pleading for them to stop) when they realised they were going to lose (or their jihadis they have sponsored, were heading for defeat)
jihaddis holding civilians hostage - not letting them go so they end up getting involved and killed by assad's lot
just another example not reported
the jihaddis attacked a few weeks ago a 'rebel' offensive which killed civilians - not much about that!!
the west really started screaming about this latest assault on aleppo(pleading for them to stop) when they realised they were going to lose (or their jihadis they have sponsored, were heading for defeat)
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539