Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
scandanavian_haven
09 Dec 16 17:55
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 May 11
| Topic/replies: 17,249 | Blogger: scandanavian_haven's blog
The Duke of York has released a statement to DENY he has had a FALLING OUT with his brother Prince Charles ShockedShocked



ffs

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 23
By:
lumponlarge
When: 09 Dec 16 17:57
can you keep me informed of any progress please
By:
Facts
When: 09 Dec 16 18:17
Parasites. Especially Andrew.
By:
leazes67
When: 09 Dec 16 18:19
Surprised fight promoters have'nt got involved,
PPV £10.
4/5 Charles. evens Andrew.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 09 Dec 16 18:24
Handbags at dawn.
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 09 Dec 16 18:31
He has issued a strongly worded statement to deny he insisted that his daughters future husbands must have a TITLE added to their name.

God who actually gets off on this nonsense, why would anyone even bother to create this fake news, might have been newsworthy in the 1600's when Royals were all the rage. They themselves must laugh at the attention they get (and the bedroom tax they avoid).
By:
donny osmond
When: 09 Dec 16 18:47
can i have a few grand on at evs please leazes

this is andrew, not edward
By:
bigmo
When: 09 Dec 16 19:06
SKY taken over by FOX.
By:
johnizere
When: 09 Dec 16 19:13
Kay Burley in helicopter circling The Palace as I type.
By:
lfc1971
When: 09 Dec 16 19:23
Secretly  I love the British Monarchy. but it's not a secret now I've been careless and blabbed it.
By:
Burton-Brewers
When: 09 Dec 16 19:35
Andrew needs to concentrate more on his daughters keeping a man rather than a title, you wouldn't really describe them as the crown jewels would you? One of them has eyes as big as a racing greyhounds b0ll0cks.
By:
twonky
When: 09 Dec 16 20:36
aaaah prince Andrew, best mate with American paedophile Epstein, who served a 1 year jail sentence for underage sex..was invoked in an under age sex trial earlier this year, where the judge, quite rightly so IMO ! Deemed that all litigation against him to be destroyed.mmm..was also a life saving helicopter pilot in the Begrano affair of the Falklands war...he turned up 24 hours later for press coverage....sold Sunningdale to a dodgy east European pm for a profit...currently trying to get his daughters onto the tax paying civil list......I doth my cap
By:
Just Checking
When: 09 Dec 16 20:48
"was also a life saving helicopter pilot in the Begrano affair of the Falklands war"
Wtf is this supposed to mean? You were on your high horse spouting nonsense, you know he was in the falklands or somehing, and the Belgrano is always a tedious leftie trope whenever the subject comes up, so you thought you'd just make some more crap up by joining the two words together and fling it at him?
By:
anxious
When: 09 Dec 16 22:08
Las Malvinas son Britaincas
By:
akabula
When: 09 Dec 16 22:32
anxious opposes the Falkland islanders (self governing) being independent, says the UK should hand Gib back but supports the Catalans who want to break away from Spain.
A bit mixed up feeling there.
By:
akabula
When: 09 Dec 16 22:33
As regards the monarchy I think we should keep it as long as they continue to cause so much upset for the lefties.
By:
mad mad moon
When: 09 Dec 16 22:38
Apparently they have to live together in "cramped accommodation" in a flat at St James Palace.
So even the royals are suffering in the current housing crisis. Perhaps Andrew should put their
names down on the Kensington and Chelsea council house list.
Failing that, they could become high class hookers like their mom, bag a chinless rich bloke,
churn out a couple of sprogs, then move to the US and use their royal connections to squeeze every
drop out of the gullible Americans.
By:
casemoney
When: 09 Dec 16 22:54
SHOOT THE BOLLIX OFF HIM !!!
By:
Capt__F
When: 09 Dec 16 22:59
Chanel 5 docco in the making
By:
akabula
When: 09 Dec 16 23:05
The Belgrano affair twonky what about this

By:
Just Checking
When: 09 Dec 16 23:17
On a related subjecte, I can't believe our MOD are getting rid of the navy's surface missiles for at least a few years, with AFAIK no planned replacement, which is totally insane. A 3rd world country with missiles could attack our ships from over the horizon and RN couldn't retaliate as they are back to 100 year old style naval guns. Idiotic.
By:
akabula
When: 09 Dec 16 23:23
Is idiotic but the guns have a decent range albeit a lot less than the 80 miles of the missiles.
By:
Just Checking
When: 10 Dec 16 01:02
Well there's a reason battleships with huge guns went away and big guns have the largest range.
Ok planes had a huge HUGE amount to do with that, but end of the day a little destroyer with good missiles can take
out an entire naval group without being touched if their defense system didn't knock them out of the sky, if
they had only normal guns and the weather was wrong.
Sheffield etc being a good case in point, anyone who read up on the mistakes and failed technology will understand.

If you have a 20 inch reach and the other guy has an 80 inch reach in a boxing match, and it takes you hours
to move inches towards him, who will win?
By:
Facts
When: 10 Dec 16 02:10
The one with the most crayons ?
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com