|
By:
Mike Smithson @MSmithsonPB
As the A50 Supreme Court hearing starts YouGov finds just 46% having a favourable view of senior judges |
|
By:
Joshua Rozenberg @JoshuaRozenberg
I don’t think @UKSupremeCourt judges will be impressed when they see someone has briefed out the speech they’ll hear from @attorneygeneral |
|
By:
Triggering article 50 without MPs’ vote would be in breach of Scottish law, says court submission pointing to 1689 act
scotland throws in 1689 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Labour’s shadow attorney general, Shami Chakrabarti, said today the political aspect of the case had been “hyped in parts of the media”. She said: “This is about process. It is not about outcomes.”
|
|
By:
Case to last four days. Verdict expected in January.
Enjoy |
|
By:
never mind 1689, i'm pretty sure magna carta will get a mention
1205 ! |
|
By:
1215
|
|
By:
Like to know how much this is all costing.
|
|
By:
no wonder this is going to last 4 days, this chap has said nothing for 45mins, apart from he has a mate who is a professor.
|
|
By:
Be better/quicker/more fun/ putting Farage and Junker in the ring for a punch-up.
|
|
By:
prerogative is doing my nut
|
|
By:
farage could put hookem up in his place
![]() |
|
By:
Ms Miller launched the Brexit legal case along with London-based Spanish hairdresser Deir Dos Santos and the People's Challenge group, set up by Grahame Pigney and backed by a crowd-funding campaign.
They argued the government could not invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty - starting the formal process of the UK leaving the EU - without seeking approval from Parliament. Three London law firms - Mishcon de Reya, Edwin Coe and Bindmans - agreed to take up the case. Ms Miller argued that only Parliament could make a decision leading to the loss of her "rights" under EU law. |
|
By:
Loves the attention and always ready to pose for the cameras.
Hopefully someone will bring up the rights of the majority who voted. |