Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
dustybin
20 Sep 16 08:24
Joined:
Date Joined: 29 Dec 08
| Topic/replies: 32,058 | Blogger: dustybin's blog
The attack on an aide convoy is disgusting.
I heard a few days ago there had been 199 breaches of the ceasefire.
So who caused the breakdown?
Were the British drones and American bombings of Syrian military justified prior to this convoy attack?

The news reports of the bombing of aide workers show an abhorrent element of the war, but is it different to America bombing hospitals?
This tit for tat nature is just a continued power struggle.
This is the real face of humanity lest anyone forget.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 74
By:
Rockinron
When: 20 Sep 16 09:15
Afghanistan bombed to rubble, Iraq bombed to rubble, Libya bombed to rubble, Syria bombed to rubble...
God bless America...Wink
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Sep 16 09:20
The US should not get involved in Syria, they will get no thanks for their efforts to bring a peaceful solution and may even get attacked in the future by the very people they have risked their lives to help.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 20 Sep 16 10:54
Whenever Syria is mentioned. I picture their tanks heading for Israel for the start of the six day war
And in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, again the Syrians tanks were heading towards Israel.

And we're supposed to give aid to war mongers such as these.
When they're perfectly capable of blowing each other to bits without any help from the West.

As for giving a home to their migrants - we must be mad to even think of taking in these kinds of people.
By:
jed.davison
When: 20 Sep 16 11:34
We have bombed them back to the Stone Age. Given that most of them are slaves to a credo that belongs there, they should be thanking us.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 20 Sep 16 11:44
a ruse so each side could damage the other
By:
ebulGery
When: 20 Sep 16 12:50
Dr Crippen  • September 20, 2016 10:54 AM BST 
Whenever Syria is mentioned. I picture their tanks heading for Israel for the start of the six day war
And in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, again the Syrians tanks were heading towards Israel.
And we're supposed to give aid to war mongers such as these.


Israel of course are not war like?
A country that should never have been created.
By:
Mikael D'Haguenet
When: 20 Sep 16 13:48
Not to mention the fact that Britain is allied to the biggest warmongers going, who themselves were previously allied to the mujahideen in Afghanistan and Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war.
By:
Mikael D'Haguenet
When: 20 Sep 16 13:50
Should be a comma after Afghanistan. Don't think the mujahideen were too prominent in Iraq under Saddam.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 20 Sep 16 14:01
Well I don't want bellicose types moving in next door to me.
Brandishing their scimitars, and manufacturing home made bombs in their bedrooms.
By:
dustybin
When: 20 Sep 16 14:24
America dont have the clout they thought they had since the Vietnam and North Korea humblings and so subscribe totally to proxy war now in their power struggles.
They chanced their arm in the Cuban missile crisis and got very very lucky (they thought they were keeping nuclear missiles out by blockading, when actually the Soviets reportedly had around 200 missiles already pointing at America in Cuba....which meant the sinking of that ship would have meant the sinking of 200 of the most prominent american cities)
By:
guinness2dear
When: 20 Sep 16 14:28
The Russkies aint stoopid; where would they have bought their jeans?
By:
dustybin
When: 20 Sep 16 14:35
Probably the Vietnamese sweatshops that americans do (and that they also derive profits from)
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Sep 16 14:36
If the Vietnamese and N.Koreans and Syrians etc a too stoopid to do what the US tells them then there is nothing much that can be done.
By:
lfc1971
When: 20 Sep 16 14:55
Vietnam, Cuba, N.Korea, Syria? have always been used by the Russians, and how has that worked out in every one of these countries?.
they had their chance in history and should have taken the side of peace and democracy and freedom with the help of America.
By:
dustybin
When: 20 Sep 16 15:00
Or put another way america tried meddling in all of em and two of em slapped em down while one was a score draw and syria was destroyed out of the usual arming of 'rebels'
By:
dustybin
When: 20 Sep 16 15:02
A coup d'etat that couldnt punch hard enough to get a win
By:
guinness2dear
When: 20 Sep 16 15:21
And of course The Black Russian has just won at Getmerobe...
By:
ebulGery
When: 20 Sep 16 19:07
lfc1971  • September 20, 2016 2:36 PM BST 
If the Vietnamese and N.Koreans and Syrians etc a too stoopid to do what the US tells them then there is nothing much that can be done.


The US does not rule this world! Countries make their own decisions

The attack on the aid convey was a reprisal for US planes attacking Syrian Government troops last week, killed 62.(which may or may not have been
a mistake)

The terrible civil war in Syria rolls on.

If it could only be ended there would be no need for Moslem refugees to flee to Europe.
I don't think Europe is winning out of this.
By:
Hamsterdam
When: 20 Sep 16 20:48
The attack on the aid convey was a reprisal for US planes attacking Syrian Government troops last week, killed 62.(which may or may not have been
a mistake)


Indeed, but attacking aid conveys is a big no no. It's disgusting and if Russia are behind it, and this seems right up there street, then woe betide them.
By:
Hamsterdam
When: 20 Sep 16 20:52
Ohh surprise surprise CNN :-

First on CNN: US preliminary conclusion finds Russian warplanes hit aid convoy
By:
Mikael D'Haguenet
When: 20 Sep 16 21:10
Woe betide them? Nobody will do anything to Russia.
By:
ebulGery
When: 20 Sep 16 21:26
Indeed Mikael.

But to solve Syria, we need to work with them, not against them.

Those aid conveys do not contain weapons, but they enable the rebels to keep fighting?

They have to eat.
By:
ebulGery
When: 20 Sep 16 21:29
The US planes that killed Syrian troops were supposed to be targeting ISIS not Assad's forces.
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 20 Sep 16 21:37
First on CNN: US preliminary conclusion finds Russian warplanes hit aid convoy

What were you expecting? They are hardly going to come out and say US preliminary conclusion finds that US backed moderate rebels/terrorists are responsible for hitting aid convoy.

This is the way it works. Russia blame the US for everything and the US blames Russia for everything.
By:
guinness2dear
When: 20 Sep 16 21:38
If there is friendly fire to blame then there is nowhere else to look but the good ol US of A..
By:
mobo
When: 21 Sep 16 08:45
Exactly. They can kill 60 syrian soldiers by 'mistake'.  So how about the convoy.?
IF the Russians BOMBED the lorries, where are the craters?
By:
mobo
When: 21 Sep 16 09:43
It has also got the 60 syrian soldiers killing off the main news.
By:
Burton-Brewers
When: 21 Sep 16 11:09
on the radio last night an eyewitness said that the convoy was hit by barrel bombs carried by 2 helicopters.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 21 Sep 16 11:16
Does it matter?
If they don't blow each other up today, they'll blow each other up tomorrow.

As regards taking refugees from places like Syria.
The number I would let into the UK would be.....zero.
For the same reason nearby Arab countries won't take any in.
Which is ''They're not like us.''
By:
dustybin
When: 21 Sep 16 12:07
....which emphases my point I've often made that the collective malevolence trumps collective benevolence.

Much is always made of good deeds, but they are always just scant viels drawn over the substantial bad ones which are done for selfish gain.
By:
stewarty b
When: 21 Sep 16 12:35
Whenever Syria is mentioned. I picture their tanks heading for Israel for the start of the six day war
And in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, again the Syrians tanks were heading towards Israel.




One thing for sure, that wont happen again and if it did it would be the one day war.
By:
mobo
When: 21 Sep 16 13:50
so they think it was the syrians then?
By:
The Leopard
When: 21 Sep 16 14:06
UN have withdrawn claim it was an air-attack
By:
The Leopard
When: 21 Sep 16 14:09
Cambridge analyst professor : Rebel groups did not want ceasefire so may have attacked convoy to destroy ceasefire
By:
The Leopard
When: 21 Sep 16 14:12
^ Tony Brenton : former British Ambassador to Russia
By:
dustybin
When: 21 Sep 16 14:14
The rebels have seemingly achieved nothing in the last six years, a ceasefire with Assad still in place is effectively a loss.
If fighting stops do America really think Russia will serve Assad up on a plate?
America have no pull here and the world knows it
By:
lfc1971
When: 21 Sep 16 15:44
Yes perhaps that`s the problem, they don`t listen to good advice. It can be an almost impossible task when you are the greatest and most enlightened power in the world suh as the US trying to civilise the natives.
Britain found this also even at the height of its great empire.
By:
lfc1971
When: 21 Sep 16 15:51
Unless a democratic and powerful country such as the US is prepared to go in not just to keep the peace but to impose its values and systems of government and freedoms of religion and the rule of law etc then nothing is achieved
If you leave them to their own devices then chaos and barbarity and repression and violence are the outcome.
By:
dustybin
When: 21 Sep 16 16:03
I dont consider flooding the world with almost 300 billion's worth of arms a year to be exactly virtuous.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com