Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Stow_judge
23 Aug 16 16:06
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Mar 01
| Topic/replies: 10,954 | Blogger: Stow_judge's blog
House prices have risen 700% in the past 30 years. That means every £1,000 invested in property in 1985 would be worth £7,000 today. Back in 1985 the average UK property price was around £31,000.
If you’d bought a property back then, it’d now be worth £217,000 on average - 7 times your original investment.

However, what you don’t hear about so often is that if you invested that £31,000 back in 1985 in a medium-risk portfolio of UK Gilts (50%) UK equities (35%) and International equities (15%) then you’d have done significantly better. Your investment would now be worth £465,000 - 15 times your original investment.

Both look fully/overpriced now. So what happens next?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 17
By:
xmoneyx
When: 23 Aug 16 16:24
plenty pros got burned stockmarket just this year

up 15%
By:
Deltâ
When: 23 Aug 16 17:51
my 1985 house has only risen 412.5% Sad


I agree with the first part of your last line and am clueless on the last answer [but would like to know it]
By:
Crisp77
When: 23 Aug 16 18:08
What are the running and maintenance costs of a house over 30 years?
By:
Stow_judge
When: 23 Aug 16 18:22
Much of the hype around home ownership and the money that can be made from
it underestimates the true cost of owning a home.
This is because most people are just comparing the cost they bought the property
for with the price they sold it for to give the “profit” figure.
Consider that if you buy a property for £500,000 and live in it for 10 years, you’ll
probably have spent almost £205,000 in extra costs that you might not have accounted for.
This means if you bought a £500,000 house and sold it in 10 years, you’d need to
sell it for at least £705,000 before you could break even.
The reason we all make this mistake is because we spend the money on our home
gradually. Things like monthly interest are factored in as an ongoing cost. Stamp
duty and solicitors’ fees come out at the time of purchase, meaning that we fail to
mentally account for those costs.


https://www.nutmeg.com/property-vs-stocks
By:
Stow_judge
When: 23 Aug 16 18:22
so, 30 years = ca. 600K Shocked
By:
Stow_judge
When: 23 Aug 16 18:24
that 205K comes from 136K mortgage interest, 50K maintenance & repairs, 3.5K insurance and 15K stamp duty
By:
xmoneyx
When: 24 Aug 16 11:23
205k extra costs

do you wallpaper bedrooms in gold flake Crazy
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 24 Aug 16 12:14
Picking and choosing which financial stuff and which funds to invest in for a comparison, is like aftertiming on the horses.

Not to mention choosing the timeframe into the bargain.
By:
Stow_judge
When: 24 Aug 16 12:17
The example is based upon a 400K property, with a 450K mortgage at 3.5%
By:
Stow_judge
When: 24 Aug 16 12:18
500K property
By:
Stow_judge
When: 24 Aug 16 12:20
I thought that was a reasonable bonds/shares split for comparison. Many would have much more shares, with more risk.
By:
Callisto-moon
When: 24 Aug 16 12:48
Just buy pints
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 24 Aug 16 13:33
Famine next - buy a farm - grow your own food.
By:
Gin
When: 24 Aug 16 17:22
I would say the OP’s 50/50 allocation is a modest (and therefore fair) representation of what somebody may have invested in.

Do the investment figures take into account charges & fees (which were much higher in the eighties than now) as that could make a significant difference to the final figure and makes a fair comparison.

Also, on the other side  I am assuming that it takes dividends into account?
By:
Stow_judge
When: 24 Aug 16 18:13
It's not made clear. You'd hope that they have taken those things into account. The impact of re-invested dividends is very signifcant.
You can download the document from the link above. You can put in a fake email address e.g. a@a.com and download it

From 1985-2015

The FTSE all share went up by ca 5 times
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/9196093/Graphic-50-years-of-the-FTSE-All-Share-index.html

The DOW Jones looks like it went up by ca 8 times
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/stock-market

You could do some calculations here
http://www.online-calculators.co.uk/interest/compoundinterest.php
By:
Stow_judge
When: 24 Aug 16 18:13
It's not made clear. You'd hope that they have taken those things into account. The impact of re-invested dividends is very signifcant.
You can download the document from the link above. You can put in a fake email address e.g. a@a.com and download it

From 1985-2015

The FTSE all share went up by ca 5 times
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/9196093/Graphic-50-years-of-the-FTSE-All-Share-index.html

The DOW Jones looks like it went up by ca 8 times
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/stock-market

You could do some calculations here
http://www.online-calculators.co.uk/interest/compoundinterest.php
By:
Stow_judge
When: 24 Aug 16 18:18
Share growth is of course another significant factor

http://monevator.com/uk-historical-asset-class-returns/
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com