
|
By:
Corbyn was basically -- there's a lot of evidence in those 12 volumes but it is too much to read so here is a rant I've prepared earlier and could have delivered any time over the past decade.
|
|
By:
Corbyn is hanging on in order to slam into Blair- he wants him charged with war crimes
once thts done- he'll be off...... |
|
By:
He only got the report this morning.
I chuckled eachtime he said something along the lines that the intervention was a disaster and how the likes of Cook had called it correct and the rest in that place had got it wrong.... All the tories sat behind him were getting agitated. ![]() |
|
By:
Would have been better if it had been the Cook Report
|
|
By:
lmfao, I have begun to wonder if this whole charade to remove Corbyn has not been orchestrated by Blair's supporters fearing he would be the only MP who would campaign to get Blair into court ? We know Cameron wouldn't have pushed it and others would back peddle because they find it uncomfortable but Corbyn,for all of his faults,would actually do it ?
|
|
By:
All the tories sat behind him were getting agitated
If the Tories are sitting behind Corbyn, we're really f*cked! |
|
By:
Corbyn is now appointing tories to his shadow cabinet as he's got nobody left in Labour to ask!
|
|
By:
Its those behind him who have the knives ready to stab him.
They are the ones who tell us that politics is all about getting into power..... It actually isnt, its about standing for those whom you represent. You should change your policy to cater for those you represent, not change those you are catering for to gain power. |
|
By:
Of all the MPs who sit in the Den of Inequity there are very few who wont churn out the same homogenised contrived sycophancy just to court power.
Corbyn is one of those. I enjoy it when he p1sses people off, because they deserve to be p1ssed. |
|
By:
The problem is he doesn't represent Labour voters, and that is why he won't get into power. If he did, he might have a chance.
|
|
By:
Not New Labour
|
|
By:
Best thing for the country is if the Labour party splits.
|
|
By:
I dont see the problem personally.
New Labour claimed more of the centre vote by artificially changing their ideological standpoint (Clause 4 etc) If Labour moves back to where it came from, appeals to fewer as a result of the more and more invested in the speculative interests of bond markets or stock numbers and hence dont gain power for it then why should A)tories or B) real socialists care? The only ones who seemed arsed are those masquerading as Labour MPs who are only interested in their own political careers (that as we have seen have become such a state of flux and contradiction that they barely have political boarders) |
|
By:
Corbyn can represent the niche that he does and it will gently fade away, rather than hang on to the coat tails of mainstream politics, dragging more socially driven forward thinking politicians with it. Long overdue
|
|
By:
Well it won't fade away, only it's influence will fade away.
|
|
By:
Corbyn doesn't want to get into power.His job is to make Labour an unelectable niche movement.. To be fair he's doing a damn good job.
|
|
By:
Its not like there arnt other parties that caters for those who like to think they think of others before themselves but really dont.
Those secret tories can jump in lock stock with the party they truly follow and those central to left can get in with the teabagging liberals. At least everyone knows where they satnd, whether in power or not. If an ideology appeals they run with it, we saw New Labour policy didnt work any better than Old Labour or for that matter spivvy worship tory. |
|
By:
Facts..........try thinking before typing, HTH.
|
|
By:
no let him carry on typing,its all utter sh!te
if he starts thinking it will be ten times utter sh!te that he types |
|
By:
I had to look what Facts said.....
But it has been taken down. ?????? Why is this? |