|
By:
shop them some condoms.
|
|
By:
The boy is clearly a paedophile, try and secretly film them at it and then show the evidence to the police.
|
|
By:
it's ok if they're from up north they'll be brother and sister
|
|
By:
Probably a bit dodgy regarding the secret filming - could end up getting arrested
himself! ![]() |
|
By:
I was thinking that myself Ron
![]() They have both reached puberty, probably the last time he will be allowed to get to get a crack at a 14 year old. I got that from "Little Miss Sunshine"...Alan Arkin as the heroin addicted grandfather telling his grandson 15 to get in while in while he could..... ![]() A Black Comedy |
|
By:
I am going to Out them- on here - after tonights footie match
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
you will know them
|
|
By:
If they have indeed been promoting ISIS propaganda, you should indeed shop them as it's your civic duty Sir.
|
|
By:
I suppose there is a slightly more serious side to this.
One would not want a 14 year old girl getting pregnant. Perhaps If the parents of these two are known, perhaps they should be informed? |
|
By:
their names are....
|
|
By:
Romeo and Juliet
nighty night |
|
By:
Maybe Romeo and Juliet were Muslims, that would make it ok then wouldn't it?
|
|
By:
Juliet was 13
|
|
By:
stone
|
|
By:
They were more broad minded then
|
|
By:
I forgot very good lmfao
![]() |
|
By:
the girl is in fact being raped thats how the law sees it if he was 15 he would not be charged with rape
but as the girl is 14 in law she cannot consent to have sex therefore he has broke the law as he is 16 he can be charged with rape and will be put on the sex offenders register for life |
|
By:
Would have been a bit of a job proving rape, since there was no sex in Shakespeare's plays
A kiss was the limit then |
|
By:
was the age of consent 16 back then? perhaps some of the more mature chit chatters remember
|
|
By:
Its not even 16 is some countries now
Life expectancy was probably 30ish for a peasant back then so as soon as they pubes they'd have been at it like rabbits imo |
|
By:
dukeofpuke is absolutely correct. In the eyes of the law he is a peodophile. If he was 15, then he wouldn't be classed as a peodophile.
|