why isn't trump odds on for the presidency?

I love the 'polls' that say Donald can't beat Ma Clinton. HTHF can they tell when they've never met in a debate or 'The Donald' hasn't picked at her past and ongoing misdemeanours? They also said he'd last a month. He will tear her a new one (Bill can't)

If he isn't full of shiit and playing to the gallery you'd want better than evens that he won't be meeting with an "accident".

They reckon the more snipes & digs they have at Trump the stronger
his support gets!!

must be infuriating the likes of the BBC & your Lefties

It's actually the Right that are infuriated.  Not like the Republicans to make a balls of it and choose an un-electable candidate.

Hilary is, unfortunately, home and hosed.

70% of woman won't vote for him

poll

Wont be Clinton anyway. Bernie is enjoying a late surge of support and has crushed her in about the last 5 states and is on course to overturn her lead with pressure on the super delegates to switch sides.

Sanders will then smash Trump in the election.

He has alienated the Hispanic vote and his crass misogyny is alienating women.

His party don't really want him and whilst his boorishness and attitude to casual violence appeals to a wide-ish demographic, he is merely shoreing up that vote, not appealing beyond it.

All of which does not make him an odds-on shot.

xmoneyx  • March 31, 2016 10:45 AM BST
70% of woman won't vote for him
poll

Why women should never have been given the vote
Well I don't mind Sanders anyone but Clinton
Her husband was useless, she will be worse....and I am a well known misogynist which clinches it for me

Bernie is enjoying a late surge of support and has crushed her in about the last 5 states and is on course to overturn her lead with pressure on the super delegates to switch sides

correct. A Clinton victory, although polling well in NYC, is no forgone conclusion.

market is hedging probability that he is shot

monica lewinsky gets the Cuban vote

Hilary Clinton still odds on....

Men ain't putting up much of a fight

Surely the policies are more important than the gender

Trump is 1.69 to be the Republican candidate.

Don't believe the bombast !

1.73 to lay

terrible trump now drifting , he may not even be the republican candidate , cruz now 4-1 to be republican candidate

get out of here you red philth

Trump now 1.75 bet 1.77 lay

Republican candidate

I imagine Its very hard to win if no women are voting for you
and they are 50% of the voters !!

yea he had only p1ssed of half of the woman until THIS ,waht a cunning stunt

imo a man with a rifle in a book depository is hitting the lay button while he waits for his moment to arrive

dont like that kind of post one bit ,you could say that about any person in power,donald has not said anything really ,in fact what he said up to now has been the reasons his popularity has soared .

Besides Donald has shot himself in the foot ,mouth ,ear and hand ,if there was anyone waiting with a rifle would be a woman

in america im afraid its a real possibility, the establishment dont like trump. he doesnt want all the wars so the military industrial complex wont be happy.

they could be finding their patsy right now for all we know, maybe a female one called patsie

shouldnt be joking really as with their history it really could happen, i do actually fear for trump (and im no fan of his).

I think Trump's problem is that he may too honest...

Sadly honesty does not always pay off in politics

in 2012 10 million more women voted in the presidential election than men, a majority of them for obama

Had only men been allowed to vote Mitt Romney would have won.

no way will the American security forces allow trump anywhere near the white house no chance

make your own trump puppet


https://twitter.com/OFalafel/status/667094362946453505

As in this country, an enraged electorate is prepared to elect anyone other than the puppets of the political-economic elite.  If WW3 follows, many of us think it's worth it.  Suspect a lot of Republican billionaires are now funding Bernie Sanders - best chance of keeping the Clintons out.  Everything's going to be ungovernable anyway.  Start digging that shelter.  With Trump alienating Hispanic and women voters (which means he can't win), I wonder if a third candidate wont appear - Bloomberg?  And Trump should keep an eye out for the (Republican-funded) man in the book depository.

Two very impersonal and unlikeable bores who wouldn't know charisma if it shagged them senseless

Bernie to win would be really cool

Bernie and Jeremiah a super win double

As in this country, an enraged electorate is prepared to elect anyone other than the puppets of the political-economic elite

Why did we vote in a majority Tory government then only last year?

.
https://youtu.be/j556MWGVVqI

Mr. Trump has become unacceptable, perhaps irreversibly so, to broad swaths of Americans, including large majorities of women, nonwhites, Hispanics, voters under 30 and those with college degrees

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/us/politics/
donald-trump-general-election.html?hp&
action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource
=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Insane stuff in America people with dark skin banned from protesting at trump rallys,like the 50s just watching it now on 4seven he must be a 1000/1 to be president absolute lunatic..

New York magazine also reveals details of another form of protection, which may explain Mr Trump's long running feud with Fox News and Roger Ailes, its chief executive and Republican Party power broker.

It claims Mr Trump came to Mr Ailes' aid in 2014 when the TV executive was embroiled in a law suit with his former PR adviser, Brian Lewis, whom he fired over an unflattering biography – written by the author of the magazine piece.

“When Roger was having problems, he didn’t call 97 people, he called me,” said Mr Trump. 

Mr Lewis claimed to have information that would destroy Mr Ailes and his TV network. Mr Trump, who knew the lawyer retained by Mr Lewis, helped broker a pay-off, according to the magazine, but in so doing learned all about the potentially damaging revelations.

If true, it would explain why Fox News was slow to defend its own journalist, Megyn Kelly, when she was lambasted by Mr Trump following a televised debate last year.

Even Ms Kelly has said she expected more support from colleagues such as Bill O'Reilly on the station. 'I do wish that O'Reilly had defended me more in his interview with Trump. I would have defended him more,' she said in the April cover story of More magazine.