Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Mar 16
23:32
Joined:
Date Joined:
18 Dec 10
Muslim man shoots at white boy in Edmonton!
You can clearly see the muslim man in the white dress..
Link below..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?a=&feature=youtu.be&v=2K3BkaW7BoQ&app=desktop
You can clearly see the muslim man in the white dress..
Link below..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?a=&feature=youtu.be&v=2K3BkaW7BoQ&app=desktop
Show More
nice area, it was just a while back you had the nutter cut the pensioners head
off a couple of in Nightingale Road - a stones throw from the above scene
off a couple of in Nightingale Road - a stones throw from the above scene
****ing things ain't they!
..Churchill done all his great speeches & good work & the end result, we
end up with a load of nutters in white dressing gowns running round trying
to kill the good folk, no need to address this - lets focus on fizzy drinks
..Churchill done all his great speeches & good work & the end result, we
end up with a load of nutters in white dressing gowns running round trying
to kill the good folk, no need to address this - lets focus on fizzy drinks
You can clearly see the muslim man in the white dress..
how do you know the gender
how do you know the gender
get this its unreal
there was a recent post office robbery near me
i got the usual leaflet through the door
stating did you see or hear anything at 6.00am
then about a week later
they posted some cctv footage
saying this I REPEAT THIS do you recognise any of the clothing in the pictures
the alledged robbers had their faces pixilated out
not totally but make your own conclusions why
unless all robbers wear boot polish these days
there was a recent post office robbery near me
i got the usual leaflet through the door
stating did you see or hear anything at 6.00am
then about a week later
they posted some cctv footage
saying this I REPEAT THIS do you recognise any of the clothing in the pictures
the alledged robbers had their faces pixilated out
not totally but make your own conclusions why
unless all robbers wear boot polish these days
That link had 200 views late last night, now over 7000.
apparently facebook keep removing it, trying to sweep the incident
under the carpet
apparently facebook keep removing it, trying to sweep the incident
under the carpet
be quick & view before they remove/hide it from us again!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDmDH0_iGYY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDmDH0_iGYY
Cheers Ron - just watched it.
Looked like a guy surrounded by rats.
What kicked the event off?
Was it a proper shooter he had?
More info required.
Looked like a guy surrounded by rats.
What kicked the event off?
Was it a proper shooter he had?
More info required.
I have football on and only heard the voice of the camera holder.
on that link someone said they tried reporting it but
the Police hung up!
Probably a New law - muslims can carry firearms
the Police hung up!
Probably a New law - muslims can carry firearms
I'll check it out properly tomorrow. Got a few things going on here
The Electoral Commission is supposed to be an impartial body that regulates UK elections.
However, lately the Electoral Commission has decided to show political bias towards Britain First.
The latest example is their refusal to allow Britain First to register certain slogans to be used on ballot papers in the forthcoming London elections.
Britain First HQ submitted a number of slogans in preparation for the forthcoming London elections:
Britain First - Keeping London British!
Britain First - Vote British!
Paul Golding - Keeping London British!
The Electoral Commission refused these slogans on the basis that they are "offensive".
Offensive to the white liberal politicians and journalists and Islamic extremists, but not to true Londoners.
The Electoral Commission is now acting as "Commissar for Political Correctness" in elections.
We are sure if Britain First had submitted "Britain First - We Love Migrants!" it would have been accepted.
We are supposed to live in a democracy with freedom of speech, but not any more.
Only those deemed politically correct are permitted freedom of expression.
We are desperately running out of time to raise the necessary funds to stand in the London elections, for mayor of London and a full slate of candidates for the assembly.
It will cost £10,000 to stand a mayoral candidate and £5,000 for a full slate of candidates for the London assembly.
After inspecting our records at HQ, here is the present state of play:
Target: £15,000
Raised so far: £10,500
However, lately the Electoral Commission has decided to show political bias towards Britain First.
The latest example is their refusal to allow Britain First to register certain slogans to be used on ballot papers in the forthcoming London elections.
Britain First HQ submitted a number of slogans in preparation for the forthcoming London elections:
Britain First - Keeping London British!
Britain First - Vote British!
Paul Golding - Keeping London British!
The Electoral Commission refused these slogans on the basis that they are "offensive".
Offensive to the white liberal politicians and journalists and Islamic extremists, but not to true Londoners.
The Electoral Commission is now acting as "Commissar for Political Correctness" in elections.
We are sure if Britain First had submitted "Britain First - We Love Migrants!" it would have been accepted.
We are supposed to live in a democracy with freedom of speech, but not any more.
Only those deemed politically correct are permitted freedom of expression.
We are desperately running out of time to raise the necessary funds to stand in the London elections, for mayor of London and a full slate of candidates for the assembly.
It will cost £10,000 to stand a mayoral candidate and £5,000 for a full slate of candidates for the London assembly.
After inspecting our records at HQ, here is the present state of play:
Target: £15,000
Raised so far: £10,500
Seriously, Ron - what kicked that event off in the first place?
Being British is offensive, it is all starting to add up.
On 2nd thoughts it looks staged, why did he miss from 10 yards ?
it crossed my mind about it being staged - but taken a fair old
chance firing a gun fake or real, it's been reported in the papers apparently now.
mail on-line have it, link below
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3498580/Shooting-suburbia-Chilling-moment-gunman-dressed-Muslim-robes-opens-fire-teenager-broad-daylight-north-London-cul-sac.html
chance firing a gun fake or real, it's been reported in the papers apparently now.
mail on-line have it, link below
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3498580/Shooting-suburbia-Chilling-moment-gunman-dressed-Muslim-robes-opens-fire-teenager-broad-daylight-north-London-cul-sac.html
Metropolitan Police confirmed it was aware of an incident in Edmonton, which happened in broad daylight at 2pm
Something seriously wrong with it all, you aim to shoot and miss from 10 feet, you miss but chose to run away with remaining bullets, all this whilst being filmed.
But it would be rather clever if the defences are using the same tactics as the terrorists.
But it would be rather clever if the defences are using the same tactics as the terrorists.
what an attitude we are aware
The Met have defused the situation by claiming..
evidence of a discharged blank firearm was discovered
The Met have defused the situation by claiming..
evidence of a discharged blank firearm was discovered
that road at the back of the shopping centers a busy road with passers
by & cars continuous - there's actually a police station 2 minutes away
at the end of that road
by & cars continuous - there's actually a police station 2 minutes away
at the end of that road
im not saying it was or wasn't staged, but i think if you was trying you might
choose somewhere a bit quieter,
choose somewhere a bit quieter,
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539