Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
http://www.luton-dunstable.co.uk/Luton-policeman-Mohammad-Arshad-appears-court/story-28698967-detail/story.html
noncey moslem(with a name like that) copper. Hope someone fks him up properly in prison.
noncey moslem(with a name like that) copper. Hope someone fks him up properly in prison.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 14
|
By:
When questioned by the police, he gave a prepared statement saying he thought the girls were aged 16 or over.
Is this the correct answer for a not guilty verdict as has been seen very recently? Richard said: “As you can see I'm in quite a lot of trouble. What if I thought she was over 16 but she was in fact under 16.” The floodgates have opened.  |
|
By:
The floodgates have opened
And children have been made more vulnerable as a result. Was a crazy judgement which every sleezeball will now hang their hat on. |
|
By:
it won't though ,because the Dragons den guy met a girl who prentended to be 18 and signed to an ADULT site . That was the big difference.
If he used that same defence after meeting her outside say a school/youth club etc he would not have gotten away with it |
|
By:
Met the girl in the pub so obviously thought she was of age. What's the difference?
|
|
By:
It's that excuse being put forward as a defence which I have a problem with irrespective of who it is that uses it. (There are 16+ year olds who attend schools & go to youth clubs Coach.)
Just to make myself clear I find the idea of a thought she was 16 defence reprehensible. Minors are supposed to be protected in law. |
|
By:
Well with a name like that I'm guessing he's one of those, you know, multicultural peopl, begins with 'M'.
|
|
By:
If you meet someone in a club or pub is it not reasonable to believe that they are over 16?
|
|
By:
So are you saying we should scrap the law Eeter?
I think lots of things come into play but simply because someone is in a pub shouldn't be accepted as a defence. |
|
By:
How she looks, how she acts etc etc maybe a defence but it's dangerous grounds.
|
|
By:
yeah,but the dragons one was on an 18+ web site - that is the difference .
Youth club etc can be either/or = no defence |
|
By:
18+ unregulated web site?
|
|
By:
then thats not his fault is it ?
HE hasn't gone onto an under 18s site pretending to be under 18 |
|
By:
As minors by law children do not have autonomy or the right to make decisions on their own for themselves in any known jurisdiction of the world.
|
|
By:
The floodgates have opened
And children have been made more vulnerable as a result. Was a crazy judgement which every sleezeball will now hang their hat on. It wasn't a judgement it was a jury verdict. It is completely irrelevant to any future prosecution. |