Daves EU deal has more Holes than the Titantic

Le Monde: “It’s all a sham”
Arnaud Leparmentier  of French Daily Le Monde comments on the deal, “The show can begin. David Cameron’s match against the Europeans, to persuade the Brits to stay in the EU, gets under way…It’s a match, of course. But it’s a wrestling match. It’s all a sham. [People] pretend to be in pain, but they are complicit. One makes noise, but one doesn’t solve anything in substance…This wrestling match must flatter the Brits’ pride, so that they are persuaded not to choose the open sea.”
.
http://openeurope.org.uk/today/blog/camerons-draft-deal-how-does-europe-see-it/

Discontent deepened when Brussels officials indicated that a so-called “emergency brake” on benefit claims by EU migrants could take 18 months to come into force.

It was revealed that the European Parliament could rip up the plan after Britain’s EU referendum if the country votes to stay tied to Brussels.
.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/640966/EU-deal-Polls-voters-Cameron-reforms

From the comments of the group leaders in the chamber it was not difficult to ascertain that in two weeks time Mr. Cameron can get very little more. In fact a close examination of the debate made me wonder whether even this deal would be ratified.
Why do I say this? Well, a paper issued to me as Co-Chairman of one of the seven parliamentary groups makes it clear that the European Parliament believes that social benefits and free movement will be changed for the British using an ordinary legislative procedure.
In English that means that it will need the approval of a majority of 751 MEPs.
The first to spot this was the eagle-eyes William The Earl of Dartmouth, a long-serving UKIP MEP from the South West.
William asked a question of Rebecca Harms leader of the Greens in the Parliament. He asked whether her group would support the proposed British deal. The answer was pretty clear: no.
So the implications are that Mr. Cameron could win a referendum on the terms of this deal for it then to subsequently be struck down
.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/05/camerons-eu-deal-may-not-be-ratified-by-european-parliament/

You have to laugh at the claims that Captain Cameron is describing due to his talks, they already exist.

so we are going to keep out of the euro

BUT WE ARE ALREADY OUT OF THE EURO

is this what he has negotiated  errrr???

Proposals mean jack sh1te anyway, most of this wont get ratified & the fact that anything wont get ratified till after the referendum tells you everything you need to know really.

Just to add the Titanic never had  holes in it, all it had was one gigantic gash, which basically sums up this deal to be honest.

it is interesting  but are we not still involved in bail outs - ie  - banks are linked internationally to prop up currencies/banks/countries???  regardless of whether we are in the eurozone???