Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
How many more are out there protected by, well who, I wonder
per BBC
The inquiry found the 1991 decision not to charge Lord Janner was "wrong" as there was enough evidence against him to provide "a realistic prospect of conviction" for indecent assault and one other serious sexual offence.
'Sincere regret'
Furthermore in 2002, allegations against Lord Janner were not supplied by the police to the Crown Prosecution Service, and as a result no prosecution was possible, the inquiry said.
And in 2007 Lord Janner should have been arrested and his home searched, because there was "sufficient evidence to prosecute" for indecent assault and one other serious sexual offence, the inquiry also concluded.
per BBC
The inquiry found the 1991 decision not to charge Lord Janner was "wrong" as there was enough evidence against him to provide "a realistic prospect of conviction" for indecent assault and one other serious sexual offence.
'Sincere regret'
Furthermore in 2002, allegations against Lord Janner were not supplied by the police to the Crown Prosecution Service, and as a result no prosecution was possible, the inquiry said.
And in 2007 Lord Janner should have been arrested and his home searched, because there was "sufficient evidence to prosecute" for indecent assault and one other serious sexual offence, the inquiry also concluded.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2
|
By:
Like the child today,i joked that some guy in a suit would appear on telly,saying,"lessons will be learned".I said the same about all the other instances of children being abused.Guess what?,A spokesman said,"lessons will be learned"AGAIN!!!.pathetic.
Still bet you the public will still vote for same ilk at the next election. |
|
By:
Janners family still trotting out the usual "he is completely innocent" rubbish
they ought to be ashamed of themselves |