Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
institutional racism by police re bijan ebrahimi and fussing over a black actress as hermione (harrypotter - the stage play)
I do worry about the sanity of this paper - you would think there was a bit more nasty and important goings on in the world
They appear to almost ignore other violent and appalling things going on!!
I do worry about the sanity of this paper - you would think there was a bit more nasty and important goings on in the world
They appear to almost ignore other violent and appalling things going on!!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 42
|
By:
A bit like the BBC then, fussing over a beauty contest today
 |
|
By:
My word,that is really,really important and did anyone note that it was coloured,or is it black ethnic according to our Bendict,gentleman that got it wrong ? Now,if he was a transgender compere it would have hit the front pages all over London.
When the BBC fret about such stuff there is usually another story they want to suppress,more immigration anyone ? |
|
By:
hope the gruniad is going to print this one
they were all over the UCL so called survey about eu migrant contribution to our economy(funded to the tune of 70 million by said eu) http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/21/uk-central-bank-report-confirms-immigration-leads-to-lower-wages/ |
|
By:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/12/21/uk-central-bank-report-confirms-immigration-leads-to-lower-wages/
Of course it does, which is why the Tories do not want it stopped and Labour are stupid not to oppose immigration and also why we must vote to come out in referendum |
|
By:
And the unions are full on in support of mass immigration to drive down wages ????????
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
There is an article on feminism in the gruniad. About how women are still held back.
Originally there were several comments mentioning the influence of muslims and misogyny of said religion/political movement which was ignored by the original piece. The comments were mild - not nasty anti muslim ones and they were still on there for a while. Now when you look at the comments you find they have been eradicated. But when you know how many muslims write for the guardian you would understand why!! Go on - ask me??? |
|
By:
Does anybody know how many Moslems write for the Gruniad?
|
|
By:
I started at A and got to E - over 100 have written for them - just for starters. The horrendous censorship of comments on there are another matter. It certainly isn't the home of free speech as it was in the 70s - it is now firmly an Establishment paper not paying its taxes hahahahahahaha
|
|
By:
Ho Ho HO!
 |
|
By:
The Guardian and The Independent are both now effectively the UK media voice of Muslim Europe.
There was once a pretence that both papers were 'feminist' in outlook. All long gone. Let 2016 be the year when 'The Guardian' and 'The Independent' finally expose the institutionalised hatred and abuse of women by followers of peace-loving religions, and also face up to the racist rapes of sexually-underaged white girls in Rotherham, Rochdale and umpteen other UK towns. |
|
By:
Meanwhile - in the parallel world the gruniad exists in - brighton figures
do you know why brighton would figure in their little world??? Think pink!!! Lost decade? What a load of tosh. Brighton has been doing great in the last decade! The Jubilee library opened its doors ten years ago, Brighton Station has been massively redeveloped, as have several of the major arteries into the city and major junctions like 7 dials, Brighton Open Air Theater has just opened, The Great Escape just celebrated its 10th year and it is growing larger with every one that passes, music colleges like BIMM and the nearby Northbrook have thrived and everyone has been loving the beautiful Brighton Wheel by the Brighton Pier, which has sadly lost its contract thanks to this massive ego-wank which most of us call the iSore. The Victorian Arches should have been restored rather than funding this monstrosity, so if there has been a 'lost decade' the i360 has contributed by soaking up much needed redevelopment funding on a folly when we should have been protecting our assets and investing money in tackling the cities homelessness problem. The new development of luxury flats in the marina breaks the strict planning laws that the marina was built under - those laws were designed to protect our environment so another project that you are lauding that ought to be condemned. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/dec/26/brighton-i360-tower-reverse-lost-decade-of-neglect |
|
By:
Could we all make big money in 2016 by going to a few Daft Left newspapers (better still the BBC) and telling them that although we are all white heterosexual man of British heritage, we've always identified ourselves as 6ft 6 black le$bian female go-go dancers by the name of Lulabelle La-Sha ShanTella Sha Nay Nay Tyson-Williams?
After all, it's how we IDENTIFY ourselves that is apparently the important thing, and ANYONE who disagrees with OUR identification of ourselves is not only OFFENDING us, but is also apparently a fascist/racist/sexist/transphobic* *insert your favourite idiotic Lefty hate-word here. |
|
By:
My advice to mobo is stop reading the gardian, you know what is in it before you even read it. that is the problem with our media no shame just full on propaganda.
|
|
By:
To be fair macarony I like to see ALL opinions - it is better to know the opposition's thinking I feel. Particularly one that is contributing to the destruction of our way of life.
|
|
By:
Re Brighton's Pink notoriety..
The Gay Men’s Sex Survey (2010) reports that of 289 respondents living in the city, 19% had never taken an HIV test, 21% last tested negative more than a year ago and of those who had ever tested, 25% tested positive. Of respondents who were not diagnosed HIV positive 87% were very confident they could get a test if required. Over half ( 53% ) of respondents’ last anal sex with a male partner (in the last 6 months) was without a condom. To sum up, it's a dangerous lifestyle... |
|
By:
Well stop doing it then you big pouf
 |
|
By:
baron
I have hit the red button several times to extinguish your anti brighton post - expect to disappear in a pouf of smoke as I wave my fairy wand!! (err ooh Mrs) |
|
By:
Baron
|
|
By:
BLAME THE WEST
This is not about UK foreign policy. It's very much about the clashing of liberal democratic norms with the barbaric norms of Sharia Law. ISIS embraces Sharia Law just as Saudia Arabia does. In the UK, Sharia Law has support from around 30 - 40% of the Muslim population. It doesn't need a genius to deduce that ISIS could have considerable support from amongst that group of Muslims. Effectively as we bring in more Muslims we are also bringing in more Sharia supporters. But if I had a white next door neighbour and he was so right wing on law and order that he supported capital punishment for adultery, amputation for thievery, etc etc I, and most, would think he was an absolute extremist loon far to the right of any political party. Someone to be wary of, or even avoid. But for the Guardinistas a Muslim with such views is a "moderate" Muslim. Double standards to say the least. Can the government put the minds of communities accepting Muslim refugees to rest and tell them they are not about to get concentrations of Sharia Law supporters moving in next to them? If not our own government is introducing into our communities the values of a barbarism our own society left behind long ago. |
|
By:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/28/palmyra-temple-bel-arch-survived-isis-syria-london-new-york
I bet daesh are shaking in their boots!! why not spend it on flood defences!!?? |
|
By:
guardiastan uncovers why we are in the mire
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jan/01/most-uk-police-forces-have-disproportionate-number-of-white-officers |
|
By:
Disproportionate to what ? In Cumbria they are probably 99% white so do they have to have 5% muslims in the Guardian minds ?
|
|
By:
Do not question the claret slurpers in notting hill land!!!!
|
|
By:
http://www.theguardian.com/media/mediamonkeyblog/2016/jan/04/bbc3-rebrand-w1a-siobhan-sharpe
I am going to have a little lie down in a dark corner for a while!!!! |
|
By:
I wonder which part of the workforce this woman writer is??
Claret slurper from Notting Hill I would guess!!! In the gaurdiastan they are light years from most people's experience |
|
By:
whoops - forgot to post the link - I must be light years away!!!! ha ha
I am a silly kant http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/04/five-steps-surviving-back-to-work-blues |
|
By:
this story about sexist male agression etc was open for comments but the story of rape and assaults in cologne has no open comment column because its to do with muslims
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/14/san-fermin-sexual-aggression-pamplona-bull-run-denounced brought to you courtesy of the guardiastan |
|
By:
the silly fools at the guardiastan have actually got an article with open comments - first time anything on muslims has been open for comment -
article by gaby hinsliff hidden away under comment it was soon shifted off the front page 5299 comments so far they are inundated!!! haha she comes to the conclusion it was the police's fault and that the comments on her article are CRAZY and on twitter it is all UKIPPERS hahahahahah the guardian twists it even further by posting the 5 best pics of comments - all following the guardian agenda approximately 4800 criticise the guardian and her stance and article yet the picked comments are all right up her ar$e |
|
By:
Here's a little taste of why muslims are such a problem. THEY DEMAND THEY WANT AND THEY WILL GET WHAT THEY WANT chip chip whinge whinge and so it goes on
The gulf between the Guardian's view on Islamic sexism and any other kind is now so vast that it's a surprise that the Guardian doesn't collapse under the weight of its own contradictions. A fascinating instance of this is yesterday's prominently displayed article - front page not hidden away in the fashion section - by a Muslim women complaining that clothes shops have the temerity to offer for sale things that she as Muslim would not want to buy. Naturally she didn't put it quite like this, but it was what she meant. Think about it. Since there isn't a shop on the western high street that doesn't sell long skirts, trousers, long-sleeved, high-necked tops and voluminous scarves, it can't be the lack of choice available to her as a Muslim that annoys her so much as the continuing provision by the fashion industry of 'immodest' clothing for women of other religions or none. 'Modest' and 'Muslim' were the terms that she used, the implication being that young women in the west who go about in public wearing short skirts and with their hair uncovered are immodest, provocative slags. It's a short step from there to saying that robbery, jeering, groping and rape are precisely what they deserve. The author of the article demanding high-fashion, designer clothing on the Muslim model - and only on the Muslim model - is not an eighty-year-old illiterate peasant but a prominent journalist. If this is the thinking of the wealthy, westernised Muslim cultural elite, it's hardly surprising that poor, young, uneducated male immigrants, and with an equally giant-sized sense of grievance and entitlement, will display similar thinking. Robbery or rape - in a culture which views women as property it comes to much the same thing. |
|
By:
To keep cologne out of the headlines you have a couple of articles on gay rights in the church and schisms there of
anything rather than mention muslims argh !!! |
|
By:
mobo - ffs it's Grauniad - it's an anagram - geddit
 . |
|
By:
I will call it what I like - it originally comes from its old history of very bad spelling in its articles form meny yeres agoe - it was notorious and maybe before your time - it doesn't come from an anna gramme ok
now onto greater things - HOW TO REWRITE THE NEWS - basically turning the tables and headline around that a muslim was killed hahaha "As Kate McMillan says, the Canadian Press is in "particularly fine form" this Charlie Hebdo morn. Your uneducated, uncredentialed amateur would probably write something like: On Jan. 7, 2015, two Muslim brothers killed 11 writers and artists at Charlie Hebdo for publishing cartoons they didn't like, as well as a policeman outside. Over the next two days, an accomplice shot a policewoman to death and then stormed a kosher supermarket, killing four Jews. But if you're a highly trained J-school graduate you know that the trick with journalism is to identify the who-what-where-why - and then remove it all. Thus: On Jan. 7, 2015, two Muslim brothers... Whoa, wait a minute. Weren't these guys born in France? Why, then, the salient fact about their identity is that they're citoyens, Frenchmen, as French as Edith Piaf with frogs' legs hanging out of each nostril: On Jan. 7, 2015, two French-born accordion-playing Gauloise-smoking Maurice Chevalier fans... Hold up there! Not all the facts are in yet. We don't want to get ahead of ourselves: On Jan. 7 2015, two French-born brothers killed 11 writers and artists at Charlie Hebdo for publishing cartoons they didn't like... Wait a minute, that makes no sense. Why would French-born people kill cartoonists over some cartoons? French-born people love cartoons. It's the land of les bandes dessinées, Asterix, Lucky Luke... Just because the victims of these French-born people happen to be in a building that includes a magazine that publishes cartoons is no reason to go leaping to conclusions. How about..? On Jan. 7 2015, two French-born brothers killed 11 people inside the building where Charlie Hebdo operated, as well as a policeman outside... What's that? You're wondering whether it's misleading not to mention the Muslim angle to the story? You're right. Gimme a minute. Lemme see here. Hmm... On Jan. 7 2015, two French-born brothers killed 11 people inside the building where Charlie Hebdo operated, as well as a Muslim policeman outside... See how easy it is when you're a professional? That's the Muslim angle neatly wrapped up. So we've got French perps, Muslim victims, miscellaneous building occupants caught in the gunfire... What else? Oh, yes: Over the next two days, an accomplice shot a policewoman to death and then stormed a kosher supermarket, killing four Jews. How do we know they were Jews? As President Obama and his spokespersons said, they were just a "random" "bunch of folks". They could have been imams stopping in for some bagels after Friday prayers: Are we working that angle yet? They could be neo-Nazis picking up some gefilte fish for the weekend skinhead convention. It's hard to tell with names like "Cohen". So let's be responsible here, and say: On Jan. 7, 2015, two French-born brothers killed 11 people inside the building where Charlie Hebdo operated, as well as a Muslim policeman outside. Over the next two days, an accomplice shot a policewoman to death and then stormed a kosher supermarket, killing four hostages. |
|
By:
Guardian = Grauniad = Anagram. Gruniad = Eer! I am unfortunately old enough to remember Private Eye's "grauniad" campaign to improve the typesetting or otherwise at the Guardian
. You should be please I posted ffs - apart from me 11 out of the last 12 posters on your fred are you. Do you ever get discouraged? |
|
By:
like I said it was all about the guardiastan's spelling mistakes and not a anna gramme
|
|
By:
I like to point out the agenda the guardiastan has
meanwhile the 6300 comment article on muslim sexual aggression in germany has been slammed shut about 90 percent disagreed with the writers version of events and explanation thats why it has been taken off and that is why I like to point this out if you will allow me this is why I like to post stuff about the gruniad - it is so fkn biased - it is no longer the liberal paper it once was but now firmly and establishment organ |
|
By:
Oh dear! So Grauniad used by Private Eye in their campaign against "old history of very bad spelling" (YOUR WORDS) is just accidently an anagram of Guardian, whereas your gruniad is.......... well, an approximation?, a guess? a mistaken recollection? a simple misspelling. You just carry on
|
|
By:
you silly billy I mispell it how I like because the grundia was notorious for its spelling nothing to do with anna gramme no where have I said it was an annie gram or made any reference to annogrammes
hope this helps |
|
By:
misspell
|