imagine if jeremy corbyn ever got in power??

Because the alternative has kept us all safe hasn't it?

No - but I'd prefer it if he'd been put up against good old imperialist western justice on a war crimes trial at the Hague, where we could have made him account for his actions, or failing that, make him look like the pathetic inadequate he was in front of all those teenage boys seduced by '80 virgins in the afterlife' (or 'w@nkers' as Boris Johnson correctly identified them as).

Question for you

Do you think that's the last 'Jihadi John' we'll hear about? We've killed the original but my bet is there's another unhinged patsy waiting in Northern Syria, willing to trade glorious death at the hands of the infidel for a few years as Kuffir's favourite bogeyman and worldwide notoriety.

You make a fair point but literally, I bet they've got another dozen murderous imbeciles lined up out there already - I mean, look at the column inches they've garnered out of the original?

Id ask Putin to kill them all using whatever weapons he felt were needed.

I listened to 'what the papers say' this morning.
It covered last weeks news from a selection of papers.

I believe it was the telegraph that actually measured the angle of corbyn's head bow in relation to remembrance sunday.
It was said to be around 10 degrees and therefore totally unacceptable.
I had trouble holding back the laughing its so fookin pathetic.

Corbyn is a laughing stock. Long may he remain.

bigH, as you don't demonstrate much evidence of a proper schooling I would imagine being more intelligent than you (or "than yourself" as you would say) is setting the bar extremely low.

The reason that JC shouldn't get into power is that he'd (further) feck up the economy. I don't think IS an be used as an argument for the continuation of the status quo, since you could well say that they got us into this mess in the first place.

IF THE government applied their trade union laws to leaders ballots he,d probably be the only leader in the country

he's recently admitted he collects manhole covers and once shagged big Di Abbott.

He'd fit in here a treat.

Leaving aside his strange taste in hobbies and women I enjoy reading what Corbyn says. He is at least thinking about the issues and formulating a considered response and that contrasts greatly with the likes of Cameron. I see nothing wrong with his comments about this goon and the other one Bin Laden. We lecture the world about our moral superiority because we have the rule of law. Of course it would be better if it were possible to put these people on trial thus demystifying them and denying them the cloak of respectability by turning them into "martyrs".

What I would like him to clarify is if his ideal scenario isn't possible would he sanction smoking these motherfruckers?

He seems very evasive when asked such questions dismissing them as hypotheticals and those are the words of a scoundrel which is concerning.

We should talk to these people , not shoot to kill says Corbyn. If they are waving an AK-47 around and shooting people in wheel chairs can we expect the policemen who open fire to be prosecuted like Sgt Blackman in Afghanistan and the policemen involved in the liam Duggan case ? What would you do in the armed response scenario ?

john92     16 Nov 15 15:07

best and most intelligent post on this thread imo

Is there any proof yet Jihadi John is dead? Or did they just kill some randomer?

It appears Mohammed Emwazi has been held to account for his callous and brutal crimes. However, it would have been far better for us all if he had been held to account in a court of law.

He doesnt say we should have got him on trial he says it would have been better if had been held to account in a court of law. He also says he has been held to account for callous and brutal crimes.

I think there are occasions when it is the only option to kill - this being a good example although it does raise the issue of what happens if we hit the wrong target.

Meanwhile, amongst all the willy-waving and empty bravado, the mother of a man who was actually murdered by the deranged idiot known as Jihadi John says:

‘It saddens me that here in America, we are celebrating the killing of this deranged, pathetic, young man.’

It gave her no solace.

‘No! Not at all! If the circumstances had been different, Jim probably would have befriended that man and tried to help him’.

She regretted the concentration of resources on revenge rather than on protecting our citizens and helping the vulnerable. ‘I am sorry,’ she said softly. ‘Jim would have been devastated with the whole thing. Jim was a peacemaker. He wanted to know how we could figure out why, why all this is happening.’

Asked if she got a sense of justice from the drone strike, she replied ‘Justice! No. Not at all. Just sad’

Diane Sawyer

Sad that this woman lost her son but it doesn't mean she is right in what she says.
Most others see it differently including some that have suffered a loss as well.

But if you think that's the end of beheadings and other grotesque murders then we must agree to differ. It'll be 'Jihadi Jeff (or Janet even) next month

I think everybody is aware of that Roger but what's the alternative? Let them live and carry on?

Roger thinks we should invite Jihadi John round for a cup of tea and biscuits and kindly ask him not to do it again. That should work a treat.

Get a grip Roger, its the likes of yourself and soft lefties that are partially to blame for the huge increase in muslims in Europe and the inviting of terrorists in to mainland Europe to commit such atrocities we saw in Paris. "Let all refugees in, im sure they are  all ok"

Then huge parts of the UK are now muslim only areas demanding everything they can get away. The leftie liberals have let these people get away with everything.