Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
24 Oct 15
23:58
Joined:
Date Joined:
27 May 11
Last couple of years
They've increased the cost of playing by 100%
They've increased the odds of winning the jackpot by 35 million
Kept the prizes for 5+1, 5, 4, 3 numbers virtually the same
Decreased the number of 20k raffle winners from 50 to 21
Wednesday's Jackpot.....£2.2 million
LOL
I'll stick to the Euro millions form now on, at least they don't try to dress mutton up as lamb. If I ever win I'm buying all regular chit chatters a house in the country, even the right wing fruit loops
They've increased the cost of playing by 100%
They've increased the odds of winning the jackpot by 35 million
Kept the prizes for 5+1, 5, 4, 3 numbers virtually the same
Decreased the number of 20k raffle winners from 50 to 21
Wednesday's Jackpot.....£2.2 million
LOL
I'll stick to the Euro millions form now on, at least they don't try to dress mutton up as lamb. If I ever win I'm buying all regular chit chatters a house in the country, even the right wing fruit loops
Show More
While true that Camelot has ballsed things up good and proper, the conclusion that Euromillions is a more sensible investment does not necessarily follow. Also, can my house be in London, please, as I'm not overkeen on the countryside where one is at constant risk of being trampled by marauding cows or chickens.
Last nights draw had nearly 1 million "winners" who matched 2 numbers.
Camelot should be done under the trade descriptions act with the word " winner "
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539