Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
24 Jul 15
19:31
Joined:
Date Joined:
20 Dec 10
PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THIS REPORT CONTAINS AN EXAMPLE OF HEINOUS RACISM AND ALL THAT IS WRONG WITH THIS FINE CALIPHATE WE CALL ENGLAND
A man who attached 'offensive' stickers to chickens
in a Sainsbury's supermarket has been given a four week curfew. Liam Edwards, 29, admitted racially aggravated criminal damage.
The van driver placed stickers on chickens at a Sainsburys store in Salford which read 'Beware, halal is barbaric and funds terrorism.'
He insisted his protest was against the ritual slaughter of animals, rather than being racially prejudiced.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 14
|
By:
What did he do wrong? He should be applauded.
|
|
By:
The luvvies will have you for that remark.
This has been viewed 17 times with ho response, they were waiting for you. |
|
By:
I'll give you a response, these halal munching bastards shouldn't be allowed in this country, along with their 15 children families and their uncles and cousins. cheers.
|
|
By:
Can you get banned for agreeing with a post?
If not I'm with bairn |
|
By:
The Bairn always gives a neutral and balanced opinion.
|
|
By:
......... I'm with him too.
|
|
By:
Even by the pitiful standards of Modern Lefty British Justice this chicken story takes some beating.
Who on earth advised Edwards to plead guilty on the ludicrous charge of "racially aggravated criminal damage" ? This nonsense needs to be appealed if possible, because I for one do not see how Justice has been served here. Which 'race' supposedly provided the inspiration for his actions? On what possible basis did someone elevate a concern with animal slaughter (and alleged links to the funding of terrorism) to a 'racist' offence? This matter needs a root and brand review from the very top of the UK's Justice system. Briatin is, once again, made into a laughing stock by such absurdity. The only case I can think of that is even more ridiculous than the above was when an elderly woman was arrested for what amounted to mere possession of a golliw*g, and then also farcically dragged to court on more fatuous "racially-aggravated" charges. Her non-crime and the non-case went all the way to trial before no evidence was offered in court by prosecutors. Heads should have rolled for it. . http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8845544/Race-charges-dropped-in-golliwog-row-after-high-level-review.html |
|
By:
Excellent post, Alun.
If somebody gets similar stickers manufactured I'd volunteer to apply them at my local supermarkets. |
|
By:
Cruel animal slaughter is legal, mentioning it is illegal! What a stupid country this is! He should get praise not a curfew.
Saves me searching for the words after 6 pints. |
|
By:
slowly chipping away
one day you will not be allowed to mention muslim or islam |
|
By:
Does anybody actually know if the poultry referred to WAS Halal? I'm not quite sure how Halal is supposed to fund terrorism.
I assume that the supermarket would have to remove these contaminated chickens from public sale. By contaminated, I mean 'stickered'. |
|
By:
chickens have to be worse than funding arms to the middle east ...oh wait luvvies only supply chicken and real traitors supply arms
|
|
By:
So its the luvvies to blame...again! They'll get their come-uppence when the non-luvvies take control! What are non-luvvies actually called?
 |
|
By:
Sensible.
|