Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
bix
08 May 15 13:31
Joined:
Date Joined: 08 Dec 02
| Topic/replies: 4,058 | Blogger: bix's blog
for you?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 30
By:
FredRescue
When: 08 May 15 13:36
1997?
By:
Clerkmore
When: 08 May 15 13:48
When Miliband nearly fell of the stage in the last debate. The British public were not going to put somebody like that into No.10.
By:
bix
When: 08 May 15 13:49
The last TV debate when he looked out of his depth, denied that Labour had overspent in the last government, and used all those phony techniques like thumb pointing, "what's your name" and other coached gestures.
By:
pumphol.
When: 08 May 15 13:51
Difficult really when you were never at any time in a position to win, having Dumb & Dumber as number one & two was always political suicide.
By:
fred c dobs
When: 08 May 15 13:51
When they stopped being the New Conservatives.be lucky Fred.Devil
By:
Burton-Brewers
When: 08 May 15 13:55
having Ed Balls in his cabinet
By:
tictacman1
When: 08 May 15 13:59
baconsandwich gate
By:
Foinavon
When: 08 May 15 16:03
Appointing Gordon Brown's treasury tea-boy as leader who then appointed Ed Balls as Shadow Chancellor. Two early own goals.
By:
bix
When: 08 May 15 16:10
And there's Russell Brand and Eddie Izard. I've no problem with Izard dressing like that but did Ed really think that walking round with a bloke in a dress and lipstick was a vote winner?
By:
artie
When: 08 May 15 16:29
Apart from the above mistakes,Milliband just didn't "look the part" of prime minister.
By:
doantwin2easy
When: 08 May 15 17:13
lost it when they appointed Milliband, bless him, and everyone at the time knew it.
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 08 May 15 17:16
appointing milliband, never have a leader who cant speak properly.
By:
brendanuk1
When: 08 May 15 17:25
death of John Smith
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 08 May 15 17:41
Death of the working class. We're all aspirational now and have the mortgages, credit cards, overdrafts, personal loans and financing on the 4x4 to prove it.
By:
DStyle
When: 08 May 15 18:08
i think they lost it on europe and miliband's refusal to hold a referendum.

my guess is that at least 75% of the lib dem defection was shared between the greens and labour, but labour's advantage was wiped out by lab to UKIP.

i also have a suspicion that it accounts for the polls: i believe that there are large number of people who would not admit voting for UKIP.
By:
alun2005
When: 08 May 15 19:12
Anyone left 'undecided' towards the end of the campaign couldn't have voted for Miliband after :

(a) "We didn't overspend"

(b) The endorsement of the toxic Brand

© The Segregated Meeting where Labour cynically and spinelessly bowed to Islam for votes. What self-respecting British woman would vote for a party like that? Not even a fleet of ridiculous Pink Buses could change that.
By:
vin2385
When: 08 May 15 19:19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJiuZRocTqo
By:
donny osmond
When: 08 May 15 19:29
let me tell you why
By:
MrBaboon
When: 08 May 15 21:02
When he failed to admit that Labour had over spent and mismanaged the economy in the past

He lied
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 08 May 15 21:22
How many of you stayed up to watch Squeaky Balls Time?
By:
no moves
When: 08 May 15 22:27
1998. scottish devolution.
By:
spellingandgrammarchecker
When: 08 May 15 23:15
Decent parents voted elsewhere after the revelations of the disgusting Labour and police cover up at Rotherham, which was reported in 2003 and 2006, but ignored.

As s working class east Londoner I'm truly disgusted by what the original working class party did to win votes in Rotherham.

And I'm told the Labour candidate was 1/5 to be re-elected.

If he was, the place must be packed with paedophiles and ignorant c*nts. 

Who else would vote Labour back in?
By:
alun2005
When: 08 May 15 23:30
Sadly, Labour's hardcore voting constituency now exactly appears to be those Peace-Loving Racist types in towns where monstrous acts were carried out against sexually-underaged white girls, and where denial and cover-up was the preferred response from the authorities and the liberal media.

They would have been looking at 100-150 seats, maybe less, without that support.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 May 15 00:04
Alun may have a point. here is a comment on the result for Birmingham Hall Green where the majority for the labour MP went from 3,799 in 2010 to 22,688 on the collapse of the vote for Respect-alliance party. Respect had 25% of the vote in 2010.

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/election-2015-who-won-hall-9208025
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 May 15 00:19
here is a report from the same source on child sexual exploitation in the West Midlands

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/child-sexual-exploitation-force-west-9151006
By:
spellingandgrammarchecker
When: 09 May 15 02:18
Foinavon,

I'll read that in the morning.

The BBC reported earlier in the week that figures for Birmingham could surpass Rotherham.
By:
posy
When: 09 May 15 11:42
the final nail in the coffin for me was his meeting that Brand fellow and putting on a common accent....you just couldn't  dumb it  down from that embarrassing episode.
By:
HH Sultan Vinegar
When: 09 May 15 12:21
good article here, written in 2010 so maybe lessons etc.


We don’t see it, but our arrogance stops us from listening
by Peter Watt


.
http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/12/02/6080/
By:
spellingandgrammarchecker
When: 09 May 15 12:21
Foinavon

I read that report.

I's that's Labour well facked again.
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 May 15 13:41
Like Rotherham, it's been going on for years S&GC. You may have noticed links to other articles on this topic which suggest that reports of child abuse have been deliberately suppressed.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com