Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32501647
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 21
|
By:
good.
|
|
By:
Perhaps they'll pay back the money to the fund they used allegedly paying their mortgage.
|
|
By:
that'll teach people a lesson trying to make a quick profit off of the back of a dead child.
|
|
By:
missing child I should say who he declared dead.
He has a chequered past if you look into it. |
|
By:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Kerching.
|
|
By:
Presumably a round of appeals next.. hopefully a LONG time before they pocket any cash reward for their 'error'.
|
|
By:
agree
|
|
By:
Perhaps the 'abductor' will contact them and ask for £350k ransom.
|
|
By:
I sincerely hope that the book has been banned. This is not about money...and never was.
|
|
By:
Have they sued the cadavar dogs for their Pedigree Chum yet?
|
|
By:
:-) Justice at last.
|
|
By:
Should pay for a few baby sitters the next time they go out on the lash with their mates.
Still no evidence of an abduction mind. |
|
By:
Justice would see the McCanns in court for neglect.
|
|
By:
mccanns will be found out one day
|
|
By:
Should be remembered that Lance Armstrong also successfully sued his accusers so this judgement really proves very little.
|
|
By:
Justice done; that book was a disgrace.
|
|
By:
Why was it ?
|
|
By:
McCanns + Internet = Conspiracy nut magnet.
similar to Amanda Knox + Internet = Conspiracy nut magnet. Actually I'd guess there's a strong correlation between the two types, because they KNOW don't they. |
|
By:
Ignorance really is bliss, isn't it, for some people. Can anyone slagging off Amaral actually say why his book is a disgrace and why you're glad the McCanns won yet more damages? No, I bet you can't. His book actually exposes the truth, a topic of which you appear ignorant, though, in his case, it appears to be the main objective. It exposes the outrageous lies of the McCanns who, it would now appear, are getting protection from MSM and certain forces that possess power.... and why might that be I wonder? Also, the neglect - forget it. They didn't neglect their children. It was a smokescreen to make their lies seem feasible, but they still didn't do a very good job. Those 2 must love it when people harp on about neglect, because it reinforces their lies. Try watching this video. You might learn something >>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8SRY_b9HbY |
|
By:
An interesting watch Whittler and quite compelling but .........
My view is that given all the conflicting evidence, lies and half-truths that are available online anyone gifted in documentary making and presenting could put forward an argument for every scenario and get substantial support. It's a bit like the bible, you take out of it what you want to believe or have others believe. BTW I'm no supporter of the mccanns and see them as a selfish pair of you know whats who put their own enjoyment before the safety of their kids but other than that I haven't a clue what happened to Madeleine. |
|
By:
The muppet said he believes she died three days before she was reported missing, creche records show she was signed out 3 hours before she was reported missing, also she was in contact with a dead body before she left for Portugal which explains the smells in various places, you do know she's a doctor. And the Portuguese courts are not apart of the establishment here are they, they decided, he should cough up and rightly so.
|