|
By:
You should only vote for the LabConDems, if you are happy with the state of the country and the direction they have taken us.
I am not so I will be voting UKIP. |
|
By:
Do yourself a favour and save the trip to the Polling Station.
|
|
By:
We see support of the Conservative Party as indicative of a profound lack of generosity, decency and compassion in a person.
We are one of the most generous and decent and compassionate countries in the world. Charitable giving by private sector is at record levels. Immigrants want to come because it's a decent place, work hard, and send their hard-earned home to causes of their choosing ( about 3* what direct foreign aid comes to ) It's our National Day ( for 4/5ths of us ) and are we taking a bank holiday - no we're out there generating taxation and working. The problem with Labour is they at heart they now believe generosity and compassion should be the function of government, not free acting individuals. Witness Jim Murphy wanting to take £175 mill of taxpayers money to abolish food banks. Yet the main reason for people going to food banks is 'benefit delay'. In other words the State is too slow and has fecked up. And he wants the State to abolish one of the short term solutions that people give freely to. LD, UKIP, Con, even Loony are in theory about letting the people be free to be as generous as they want to be, and we certainly are generous. Vote NOC! |
|
By:
macarony speaks for all sensible members on chit chat.
|
|
By:
Facts is typical of Labour not the Labour voter.
Facts like his Labour Party hates his own country,hates its culture,its history and its traditions. They promote inferior cultures. The Conservatives are no friend of the working class but they don't hate them. Labour despise the working class especially the in their eyes the uneducated working class. Facts is a great example in this,he calls them " swivel eyed" " knuckle draggers " to him they are ignorant not enlightened like him and his Labour metropolitan elite. The only party speaking for the British working class is UKIP. The only leader speaking for the working class is Nigel Farage. Don't believe the propaganda,don't believe the smears of the BBC on Farage,listen to what he says. |
|
By:
So many on the left are consumed by hatred for people who disagree with them. You dont see it the other way around anywhere near as much. Read the postings on sites like the Guardian and some of their posters are truly frightening in their hate.
You can just imagine them faces contorted in anger their blood pressure soaring as time after time they write things like "evil tory scum". |
|
By:
Facts is a wanchor.
|
|
By:
The three posts immediately above this one are from the formrites i'm talking about.
|
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Oh and btw. The Tories are evil scum .
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Calm down facts. Life is too short to be so angry and irrational. Maybe you should go and lie down in a dark room.
|
|
By:
So many on the left are consumed by hatred for people who disagree with them
oh how true |
|
By:
To an extent I can understand Facts hatred. Luvvies tend to be irrational over emotional sorts. It's the comments about decency and morals coming from a party which condemned thousands to unspeakably vile abuse up and down the land in the name of community cohesion which no decent person will in good conscience allow to go uncommented on.
|
|
By:
No point in starting a new thread - this looks like a likely place!
Hot off the press: Labour, bringing Third World Corruption to a local authority near you. Lutfur Rahman found guilty of illegal practices in Tower Hamlets election . http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-32428648 |
|
By:
Vote tactically for a coalition. Tories and Labour don't like it so that should be reason enough.
|
|
By:
Vote tactically for a coalition. Tories and Labour don't like it so that should be reason enough.
I honestly think that the Con - Lib Dem coalition was the least worst result last time around. I still haven't decided this time. |
|
By:
I always vote for the least worst option. Coalition govts are here to stay. Politics has changed and no one party can represent the views of most people. Labour and Tories don't like this they prefer the cosy traditional tribal arangement.
|
|
By:
There is nowt more dopey than the tribal Labour voter.
|
|
By:
There is a saying;
You start off socialist in life and die a capitalist. Borne from the fact that people tend to have nowt when young but accumulate wealth through life. Start out Labour, end Tory. I see it somewhat differently. I simply see it as the greedy small man syndrome voting tory. Doesn't matter how much I have or will have, Id never vote tory because I see through the insidious nature of protecting their own at the cost of the rest. Tory voters (in general, not all) tend not to care about their own situation (other than expecting to be free to do as they wish) but take delight in degrading others' lots, simply to make their own wealth seem of more value. Ponces imo. |
|
By:
Ponces? That's rich.
Where you write:
|
|
By:
I'm of the belief Pokermonster that all people irrespective of background are infact malevolent by nature.
The poor people arn't virtuous by being poor, give many the chance they will rob you blind, its just in many cases you can see the colours of the tory because they have been given what they wanted.....the chance to cut somebody else's throat |
|
By:
I'm afraid I disagree again, sir. I believe most people are benevolent by nature.
|
|
By:
I can't agree.
If somebody believes they can cheat and get away with it they probably will, the telling factor in the equation is the 'perceived ability to get away with it' |
|
By:
There is always a cost to everything.
Take Newton's third law. For every action there is an equal and opposite re-action. Do people blind themselves over where their wealth comes from? |
|
By:
Of course there is the added complexity of what constitutes 'a fraud, a lie, a cheat' etc.
A moral fraud can be lawful. Simply because a clique has agreed so, and you had no say in the matter. So is the act of willfully degrading other people's interests benevolent or malevolent? |