Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
03 Apr 15
16:18
Joined:
Date Joined:
20 Dec 10
Nice. 
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 17
|
By:
Well done, over 20 grand @ 1.01 traded. I laid the other Godolphin runner Portamento and that was never in danger of winning.
|
|
By:
Fab wasn't it. Seems to have upset one long-standing gentleman on the HR Forum though.
|
|
By:
btw…. S&GC….. don't scold me but I've suggested another Politics Forum bet for you… you know, the sort you won't get paid out on.
regards etc |
|
By:
Alun, I shall poke my nose around after Lingers has finished.
|
|
By:
it's on the thread you started about the "mass debaters".
Sorry to waste your time and all that. 1.01 you'll win the bet and won't get paid. |
|
By:
SlippyBlue
03 Apr 15 16:20 Well done, over 20 grand @ 1.01 traded. I laid the other Godolphin runner Portamento and that was never in danger of winning. I layed Primrose Valley and Blue Aegean, and thought I had done me dosh. Also layed Hidden Gold in the 4-45. |
|
By:
Thanks Alun.
|
|
By:
Damn, was on Anglophile there. I was tempted to lay Hidden Gold as well but backed the other one instead
 |
|
By:
I rarely back these days.
I missed the start of the new lay comp on the HR forum. I'd still be standing. |
|
By:
A pleasing acceptance of the "challenge" indeed S&GC.
|
|
By:
Well done spelling, very nice result for you.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
pumphol
Wolverhampton fillies and mares lost 43 consecutive races in March |
|
By:
horse misogynist ?
or are mares and fillies afraid to get in front of the colts' dangly bits ? |
|
By:
My stats database, fillies and mares aren't much good in mixed sex races on the AW, at any course.
There have been some fairly big priced winners since Jan 1st, but they are outweighed by loads of smaller priced losers. Even after laying that 66/1 winner of the 4 horse race the other day, you don't lose a lot because of the other losers on the same card. This month: 10 at Chelmsford - 1 winner at 6/5, shortest price loser was 11/4 24 at Dundalk - 2 winners 9/2 and 8/1, shortest price loser was 9/4 13 at Kempton - 1 winner st 14/1, shortest price loser was 7/2 6 at Lingfield - all beaten, shortest price loser was 5/2 10 at Wolverhampton - all beaten, shortest price was 13/8. 6 at Southwell - 1 winner at 66s, shortest price loser was 11/4 |
|
By:
10 at Chelmsford - 1 winner at 6/5, shortest price loser was 11/4
24 at Dundalk - 2 winners 9/2 and 8/1, shortest price loser was 9/4 13 at Kempton - 1 winner st 14/1, shortest price loser was 7/2 6 at Lingfield - all beaten, shortest price loser was 5/2 10 at Wolverhampton - all beaten, shortest price was 13/8. 6 at Southwell - 1 winner at 66s, shortest price loser was 11/4 betting Chelmsford ......... -7.8 24 at Dundalk ...... -9.5 13 at Kempton ...... +2.0 6 at Lingfield ..... -6.0 Wolverhampton ..... -10.0 6 at Southwell .... +61.0 overall +29.7 but I'm sure you are right most if not all years |
|
By:
faux pas in admin
Southwell figures are part of March, no meeting there in April, yet. January 1st to March 31st CHELMSFORD 13 winners from 137 runners from 63 races with a total of 518 runners DUNDALK 24 winners from 310 runners from 81 races with a total of 827 runners KEMPTON 22 winners from 247 runners from 87 races with a total of 848 runners LINGFIELD 32 winners from 347 runners from 134 races with a total of 1142 runners SOUTHWELL 22 winners from 213 runners from 101 races with a total of 796 runners WOLVERHAMPTON 36 winners from 496 runners from 186 races with a total of 1614 runners RUNNING TOTAL FOR 3 MONTHS WINNERS = 149 RACES = 652 RUNNERS = 5745 3906 - colts,geldings and horses 1839 - fillies and mares Biggest winners 3 @ 21 4 @ 26 2 @ 34 1 @ 41 1 @ 67 |