You just can't take the arithmetic average as you'd get a misleading result ... for example a lot of chit-chatters are about 12 or 13, whilst a lot are in their 90s.
So you'd get a mean of about 53.7523.
Which would be meaningless.
Best use the harmonic mean.
You just can't take the arithmetic average as you'd get a misleading result ... for example a lot of chit-chatters are about 12 or 13, whilst a lot are in their 90s.So you'd get a mean of about 53.7523.Which would be meaningless.Best use the harmonic
Ken, that would be the harmonica mean, which is a different kettle of fish, ststistically speaking. That's why your reply resonates.
I use the harmonic mean to identify which horse I should lay in my infallible "only lay horses that you think will lose" system.
Ken,that would be the harmonica mean, which is a different kettle of fish, ststistically speaking. That's why your reply resonates.I use the harmonic mean to identify which horse I should lay in my infallible "only lay horses that you think will los
I would guess the Chit chatters are of a more mature age than the guys from the footy forum. Some (not all) of the footy forumites seem to have the mental maturity of an adolescent school boy with a rush of hormones to the head. Of course Im generalising, plus there are fair few laydees on there too.
Happy B/D Roger! I would guess the Chit chatters are of a more mature age than the guys from the footy forum. Some (not all) of the footy forumites seem to have the mental maturity of an adolescent school boy with a rush of hormones to the head. Of c
I would guess the Chit chatters are of a more mature age than the guys from the footy forum
that's an understatement. I heard saga were currently in a bid off with Axa Sun Life for sponsorship rights.
I would guess the Chit chatters are of a more mature age than the guys from the footy forumthat's an understatement. I heard saga were currently in a bid off with Axa Sun Life for sponsorship rights.