Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Wesdag
15 Mar 15 18:57
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Aug 09
| Topic/replies: 21,689 | Blogger: Wesdag's blog
They have the nerve to break ranks with the media's constant brainwashing efforts supporting same sex families.

Elton's all upset now.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/31896339

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 34
By:
Ramruma
When: 15 Mar 15 19:06
D&G also oppose test-tube babies (IVF) for straight couples.
By:
Injera
When: 15 Mar 15 19:08
They speak very clearly and profoundly on the issue. Bravo!

What's disconcerting is that the gay community get angry and want revenge. Why has John called for a boycott? How immature is that..
By:
Wesdag
When: 15 Mar 15 19:15
Exactly Injera.

Any dissent gets vigorously opposed.

Ram - a gay couple can not create a child that is genetically and exclusively their own.

All the political correctness in the world will not change this fact.
By:
ebulGery
When: 15 Mar 15 20:45
exactly Wesdag

Why would evolution go to the bother of creating two sexes and if we need only need one

Children need a mother and a father

Gays are just a nasty load of bullies now imo
By:
MadVlad
When: 15 Mar 15 20:49
I'm straight but for what it is worth I'm of the opinion as long as the child is brought up in a loving enviroment then the child feels valued.
By:
mobo
When: 15 Mar 15 21:14
where does it leave an individual if you feel this is so wrong
do you get locked up if you oppose it now

after all they have laws to protect islam and gay marriage and all sorts of things
none of which have anything to do with the natural system of life??
By:
mobo
When: 15 Mar 15 21:15
an interesting juxtaposition of ideas there I suddenly realise - Islam  and gays   ha ha!1
By:
creatureinthesky
When: 15 Mar 15 22:27
Why would you even care about gay couples using IVF to have kids ?

Are you saying IVF is wrong in any sense ?

Anybody can be a parent technically, but do you really believe that being a 'mum' or 'dad' is the same thing ?

Are relationships between adoptive parents and their kids somehow less valid ?

As for 'nature' seriously, we'd half of us  be dead if it was left to that...

Your child needs a vital organ transplant - no ta, that's not nature's way Confused

Really, why does this issue bother you, what are you really angry about ??
By:
ebulGery
When: 15 Mar 15 22:38
Because one cannot pretend that two people of the same sex marrying??? one another is the same as the marriage between a man and woman

One cannot pretend that two people of the same sex can give birth to a child(in fact they don't), again one needs a man and a woman

We are contradicting about 150,000 years of evolution.

I do not believe we can get away with this
By:
Ramruma
When: 15 Mar 15 22:40
IVF (test-tube babies), one-parent families, adoption?
By:
akabula
When: 15 Mar 15 22:42
You've probably committed a crime saying that ebul such is the swing in favour of gay people.
By:
ebulGery
When: 15 Mar 15 22:43
I believe in IVF, for women who cannot have children
I believe in adoption...children do need a loving environment

The problem I have is the attempt to create single sex societies, we have been provided with two sexes
we really should stick to them
By:
ebulGery
When: 15 Mar 15 22:44
I can well believe it akabulaSad
By:
akabula
When: 15 Mar 15 22:53
I'm not religious myself but I do know the bible teaches that man shall lay with woman.
Now knowing that why are gay couples insisting on the right to marriage in church?
I'm glad I'm old ebul cos the way it's going it will soon be compulsory.
By:
Do wah Diddy
When: 15 Mar 15 23:01
ENGLAND AND ITS SEX AND DEPRAVITY AND GAMBLING,AND DRINK AND DRUGS  AND SELF INDULGENCE IS FAR WORSE THAN THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE ,IT WAS JUST THOSE IN POWER IN THEM DAYS ,EVERY  BODIES AT IT THESE DAYS ,
By:
Do wah Diddy
When: 15 Mar 15 23:06
YOUVE ONLY GOT TO SEE THE BRITISH IN MAGALUFF ,TO KNOW WHAT THE BRITISH ARE DEGENERATING INTO ,NO WONDER THESE MUSLIM WOMEN IN VEILS THINK WHERE THE INFEEDELS.
By:
ebulGery
When: 15 Mar 15 23:15
I am the same feeling akabula

Well I suppose we will go the same way as the Roman Empire Do Wah Diddy
I have seen a sad degenerate of our morals values in my lifetime, pity because we live a very physically comfortable life now
We always seem to mess things up one way or another

I think we are being in very silly with gays, we really do not what we are doing, pretty much as usual I supposeSad
We do not even see it right for a start
By:
treetop
When: 16 Mar 15 00:16
ISIS will sort all that out soon lads, what the BBC says then will amuse me,desperate to appease Islam but repelled by their levels of tolerance ?
By:
polybot
When: 16 Mar 15 07:05
http://www.towleroad.com/2015/03/three-men-in-thailand-become-the-worlds-first-married-thruple.html

full disclosure: my company is currently in negotiations with the happy trouple in regards to selling them a set of matching triplets* sourced from Western Africa, but we have a strict "love" policy that stipulates the owners must have gone through some ceremony where at least one wears an expensive white dress (other colours are permitted) and/or the ceremony is conducted in a fancy building with a big bell and/or a tall pointy thing on it.


*some major genetic differences may show up in subsequent testing but at point of sale all babies will look more or less the same according to our independent adjudicator.
By:
Wesdag
When: 16 Mar 15 16:20
Creature,

for Elton John & his husband's children, who provided the egg?
By:
mememe
When: 16 Mar 15 16:43
What nobody can know yet is the result of "engineering" things, whether it be science, eg. GM, or whatever, medical science, like having kids without a mother, multiculturism and unbridled immigration, and so on and so on.

But I do know that a lot of genies have been let out of bottles and they can't be put back in.

The world has alway been changing, but I fear it's getting faster and less beneficial in many areas.

Yes, we're probably all doomed.
By:
Wesdag
When: 16 Mar 15 16:50
Just sticking with the idea of gays having children, we're going to have some very weird looking family trees in the near future.

No thought being given to the children of this social experiment.

The gay lobby is very vocal and hysterical, shouting down anybody who has the temerity not to agree with them.
By:
mememe
When: 16 Mar 15 16:59
Wesdag

Who knows what the psychological or genetic make up of these engineered humans will be like - or their off-spring, or the off-spring of theirs?

Does anybody know with certainty?

In my lifetime, medical science has got it horribly wrong occasionally ... e.g the development in the 50s of a "cure" for morning sickness.
By:
Injera
When: 16 Mar 15 17:04
Social engineering could well follow. Designer babies etc..

Not sure I'm happy with IVF. Often live embryos are destroyed to prevent multiple births. It's Russian roulette.

The issue I have with the gay lobby is that they got where they are on a ticket of tolerance and diversity but when opposed they say 'our way or no way'.

Somethings are best left alone. Mum Dad and kids is a pretty awesome blueprint across the world and has worked for thousands of years. Why compromise just because the gays in the media and parliament say so?
By:
mobo
When: 16 Mar 15 17:13
Most of the gays I know or have met seem to be very sane people. Good company too, but I think we have gone too far with rules and laws on this subject.  The odd thing is (in company) piss taking and jokes about gays(which harriet would want you locked up for) are taken in good spirit and even self deprecating jokes from their own mouths.

The main thing, as with other groups, is to be treated fairly.
By:
Wesdag
When: 16 Mar 15 17:13
Agreed.

Given the choice, what child, all things being equal, would prefer not to be raised by a man and a woman?
By:
Wesdag
When: 16 Mar 15 17:15
^ agreed with Injera
By:
alun2005
When: 16 Mar 15 17:30
The media reaction to this will be hysterically one-sided, and no-one in the liberal media will seek to examine whether D&G's honestly-expressed and perfectly reasonable comments might well resonate with a majority in Britain.
By:
Wesdag
When: 16 Mar 15 17:48
Yep, D&G will be placed on the naughty step for being so controversial in opposing the great gay rights steamroller.

At least they can't be branded homophobic which is usually the charge levelled against anyone who dares to oppose.
By:
cloughandtaylor
When: 16 Mar 15 18:02
Elton has always appeared a bully to many who have asked for his autograph without success.

He has always appeared to me to be confused, a regular sh@gger of rent boys, marries a WOMAN to create a diversion, divorces her and marries a blokeCry

Much of this media push for **** acceptability is driven by the tv companies and aimed at youngsters, they were banned once from brain washing the public that f a g s were ok and so ended the advertising.

On that note, rumour has it the bbc are to spend the clarkson salary on a period drama of Adam and Eve, expect to see a gay love scene within 30 mins.
By:
akabula
When: 16 Mar 15 18:04
mobo

Most of the gays I know or have met seem to be very sane people. Good company too, but I think we have gone too far with rules and laws on this subject.  The odd thing is (in company) piss taking and jokes about gays(which harriet would want you locked up for) are taken in good spirit and even self deprecating jokes from their own mouths.
The main thing, as with other groups, is to be treated fairly


What do you mean by that? What other groups are you referring to?
By:
sixtwosix
When: 16 Mar 15 18:54
Surely they are allowed an opinion , just because it does match that of a multi multi millionaire does not make it newsworthy in my opinion .
By:
gawdalmighty
When: 16 Mar 15 18:57
Wot MadVlad said.
By:
flushgordon1
When: 16 Mar 15 19:23
The bitch is back.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com