RINGO STARRS ADMITS PAUL McCartney died on 9/11/66 and was replaced by stand in

Did Ringo Starr Admit Paul McCartney Died In 1966, Replaced With Look-Alike?
Posted on March 1, 2015 by State of the Nation
Share
Facebook.com Removes Original Reference To Paul’s Death on Google which Appeared on Ringo Starr’s Personal Facebook Page

TMR Editor’s’s Note
Years prior to the The Millennium Report website going online one of our writers conducted exhaustive research into the “Paul McCartney is Dead” conspiracy. It is, in fact, a real conspiracy because of the number of willing participants who, by necessity, had to participate in it in order for it to be successful for almost fifty years.

However, only one element has been missing over the past 49 years. And that is a member of the BEATLES stepping forward to tell the secret. It appears that the dirty little secret has now been told by Ringo Starr. Certainly, with the death of his bandmates, except ‘Paul’ of course, the burden of the secret became greater for him to carry alone as the years wore on.



The newsprint piece shown above well captures the respective roles of the four BEATLES. What it fails to point out is that Ringo Starr was not only the drummer, he was also the heartbeat of the band as all drummers are. It now appears that the true story about Paul is Ringo’s to tell or else the heartbeat would become increasingly labored by the weight of the secret. There is no one else who has the authority, by virtue of his firsthand experience with the whole wild and crazy affair, like Ringo Starr.

The exhaustive research that we at The Millennium Report conducted over several years proved — beyond a shadow of a doubt — that the original Paul McCartney did in fact leave the BEATLES circa 1966. About that little fact there is no question. And, there is now a massive body of forensic proof, anecdotal testimony, scientific photographic analysis, circumstantial evidence, etc. on the internet which supports Ringo Starr’s alleged recent revelations.

The following article appears to be correct in stating all the primary facts with the exception of the very last paragraph as follows:

“The British MI5 also announced an investigation to determine if an impostor could have indeed posed for 48 years as the Member of the Order of the British Empire, Sir James Paul McCartney, during official ceremonies involving Queen Elizabeth II.”

Surely, it was MI5 which coordinated the entire coverup, since they were best positioned to ensure that the conspiracy of silence would stick for so many years.

As for why the BEATLES agreed to go along with the coverup scheme since 1966 — the answer, especially if you were living during the 1960s and had sisters who could sing every single BEATLES song with perfection, is quite obvious. Paul McCartney’s death would have triggered an unprecedented shock to his millions of young and often delirious female fans around the entire world.

For a much better explanation of just how traumatic such a shocking revelation would have been in 1966, the following true story is presented for the reader’s edification.

“During the BEATLES performance at Shea Stadium, which kicked off their 1965 US Tour, the massive contingent of New York City policemen who were assigned to crowd control reported “rivers of urine” which flowed from the girls and young women in attendance, they were in such genuinely altered states. They were so excited and beside themselves that they were literally ‘unconscious’ to controlling their bodily functions.”

Here’s another take on the fans’ out-of-body excitement and uncontrollable urges:
Did Beatle fans wet their pants at concerts??

Clearly, MI5, MI6, together with the British Monarchy and Parliament had to make a very swift command decision to hide the death of Paul McCartney. The following quote from Guitar World’s article titled “Did Paul McCartney Actually Die in 1966?” reveals more of the inside story.



Lastly, it must be acknowledged that Paul McCartney’s replacement was tasked with one of the toughest jobs in the world. Regardless of who he really is, the new Paul (some call him Faul) was certainly coerced to play a roll that only preordained destiny could have fatefully brought to him in November of 1966. In this light, his was one of the greatest sacrifices ever made in modern times. For he was compelled to leave behind his real identity for the rest of his life in the interest of the greater good for all of humankind.

Now many may say, as many have already said, that he was an imposter. No, he was not an imposter!

In reality, all of us are called upon from time to time to be or act like something that we are not. We spontaneously fill that vital role in the moment because it is ours to do. In the case of Paul McCartney’s replacement, his noble and selfless deed surely saved the lives of who knows how many across the planet?