Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
kenny mann
22 Feb 15 18:58
Joined:
Date Joined: 29 Apr 10
| Topic/replies: 38,081 | Blogger: kenny mann's blog
A debate is to be held tomorrow on the above, by MPs. I don't think there's much chance of this being abolished  but there's a petition if you'd like to sign. Needs signing today though.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/595/835/594/?z00m=22634157&redirectID=1599982265

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 53
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 19:00
On Monday, February 23 MPs will debate whether to end no-stun slaughter for animals. Please sign this petition before Monday to ask your MP to ban no-stun slaughter and stop this awful, widespread animal cruelty.

While we respect faith traditions with specific slaughter practices, scientific evidence shows that livestock feel fear and pain unless they are stunned first. Veterinarians say that cattle being slaughtered can take 2 minutes or more to lose consciousness, their bodies opened up and blood draining slowly from them.

It doesn't have to be this way. We have the technology to treat these animals humanely, and all slaughterhouses should be forced to do so.

Other European countries such as Denmark have banned slaughter without pre-stunning. Animal advocates in the UK are calling for an end to slaughter without pre-stunning, and on Monday February 23 MPs will finally hold a debate on whether to protect these animals.

Please sign this petition before the debate to let your MP know that you strongly urge them to protect animal welfare.
By:
akabula
When: 22 Feb 15 19:22
Will do Kenny.
We call ourselves civilised yet we allow animals to be slaughtered without stunning first.
A savage practice.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 22 Feb 15 19:25
Signed
By:
Barry Conway
When: 22 Feb 15 19:41
I don't think it is possible to ban. They did it in Poland. However the ban was overturned a year later by the European Court of Human Rights!
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 19:41
well done chaps

signed while I'm here

oops, wrong thread Grin
By:
Makybe_Diva
When: 22 Feb 15 20:00
Signed
By:
Burton-Brewers
When: 22 Feb 15 20:10
did it a while ago Kenny, they won't take any notice though they are sh1t scared despite the video that was shown a few weeks ago.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 22 Feb 15 20:15
Signed. Someone made a comment that a lot of religiously slaughtered meat like kosher and halal are indeed stunned before slaughtered. If that is the case then all should comply with the existing law in any event.
By:
Make my hay
When: 22 Feb 15 20:37
Signed. If slaughter has to be done it must be done humanely. How can any civilised person think otherwise?
By:
sixtwosix
When: 22 Feb 15 20:43
Lots of tough talk and action on issues like smoking , the latest being smoking in cars containing children ........but barbaric slaughter of animals ,rather than a civilised humane method ,so as not to upset various followers of non existent dieties , not a chance ......we did win the last war didn't we ?
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 21:28
Indeed Burton, little chance as I said in the opening post. Won't do any harm signing tyhough.

Thanks all.
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 21:43
Hi Kenny, What exactly are we voting for?; Do you understand the proposed legislation? How does this affect chicken and turkey? Are these still to be killed by normal non stun means or is something else proposed?. Are you able to assure us that this legislation will not affect the price of the chicken in our ovens.  I think we should be told.
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 21:49
Hi blackbarn. I know what is in my 19-00 post and that's it.

Does it really matter if the price of your chicken goes up 10p if they are killed humanely?
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 21:50
kinnell, you can buy a poor bird for £2!
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 22:06
Kenny!  So your 1900 post is the sum total of your knowledge on this subject?  I never cease to be amazed that you continue to speak so authoritatively about a subject that you appear to know so little about.

So to be specific and very precise - how will what you are proposing affect the welfare of chickens?
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 22:06
Kenny!  So your 1900 post is the sum total of your knowledge on this subject?  I never cease to be amazed that you continue to speak so authoritatively about a subject that you appear to know so little about.

So to be specific and very precise - how will what you are proposing affect the welfare of chickens?
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 22:12
ffs, you are an obtuse prik. I have never said or pretended that I am an expert on the subject of animal cruelty. I leave that TO the experts to advise me and act accordingly. It's clear from your various posts over the years that you care not a jot for animal suffering and act accordingly.Either sign it or don't sign it and fack off. I'm watching the cricket!
By:
Emden
When: 22 Feb 15 22:12
signed
By:
akabula
When: 22 Feb 15 22:28
blackbarn why don't you fo and take your silly little smart a55 posts elsewhere.
Does someone need to be an expert on the subject before they can ask that animals are killed humanely?
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 22:39
I'll have a word with his mate Slippy to give him a smack.
By:
akabula
When: 22 Feb 15 22:41
I'm surprised he's got a mate. Total cant as far as I can see.
By:
mobo
When: 22 Feb 15 22:44
These daesh chappies on the beach   -   do they stun those guys before they cut their heads of then?  jolly decent of them I would say  pip pip!!!
By:
mobo
When: 22 Feb 15 22:46
maybe they did it to those 1400 white girls too - stunned them I mean - again, rather humane i think and not the monsters they have been portrayed as.

Gives a new interpretation to the word stunning when applied to a young female.

I am getin gud att this tie pin lark!!!!
By:
mobo
When: 22 Feb 15 22:47
HALAL ****!!!   I am on a roll here - or maybe something else like London Pride ha ha!!!
By:
mobo
When: 22 Feb 15 22:48
Halal pu $$ ie          i have been zapped by those who have to be obeyed
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 22:55
Akabula - it seems to me that I am not the one seeking to change peoples' opinions on here; I am merely seeking simple evidence for claims made.

I guess i could simply "fo" (akabula) and I could just be an "obtuse prik" (kenny mann) but actually as a raiser of stock, I care hugely for animal welfare and find a lot of the unsubstantiated claptrap on here ridiculous. I have respect for anyone who out of principle elects not to eat meat, but.....the simplistic and selective stuff verges on the ridiculous....

We have animal loving folks on here advocating new legislation without knowing exactly which animal it relates toCrazy and how.
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 23:00
Akabula and Kenny.  If you don't want to debate this subject just let me know.
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 23:04
Is not stunning an animal cruel or not? If not, all the experts have got it wrong. If it is cruel sign the fackin' petition.How complicated can it be?
By:
akabula
When: 22 Feb 15 23:06
You don't need to be a vegetarian or whatever else to want animals to be humanly killed.
Neither do you need to know the intricate details. All you need to know is that it is humanely killed.
Lots of experts out there to keep us informed of what's humane and what's not.
By:
ebulGery
When: 22 Feb 15 23:08
signed
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 23:13
scientific evidence shows that livestock feel fear and pain unless they are stunned first. Veterinarians say that cattle being slaughtered can take 2 minutes or more to lose consciousness, their bodies opened up and blood draining slowly from them.
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 23:17
I am a huge fan of humane killing of animals
I do not believe that most pre-stunning methods are less cruel than most simple throat-slitting methods.
I believe you DO need to know the intricate details on this subject in order to understand it.
I do not think that all you need to know that it is "humanely killed" because this is an all encompassing term meaning nothing.
I am generally not a great fan of "lots of experts" on almost every subject.

Apologies for the I's, but then I appear to be in the dock
By:
wit-ham
When: 22 Feb 15 23:18
signed
By:
kenny mann
When: 22 Feb 15 23:24
Well it looks like you're on your own in that view, blackbarn

From the RSPCA page

Evidence clearly indicates that slaughter without pre-stunning can cause unnecessary suffering.
By:
Emden
When: 22 Feb 15 23:24
I am a huge fan of humane killing of animals

ok, thats good (if you mean to eat and not hunt for fun)


I do not believe that most pre-stunning methods are less cruel than most simple throat-slitting methods.


mmmmm..... this is where you might find some people disagree
By:
akabula
When: 22 Feb 15 23:28
You 'believing' and 'thinking' is hardly an argument against me 'believing' and 'thinking' differently.
What do I need to know. There are enough people to keep me informed as I said.
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 23:41
Thanks Emden, rabbit, squirrel and deer in season to eat, not sure I kill anything for fun, except perhaps Magpies and foxes.

Re pre-stunning, you can do your own research. Kenny quotes RSPCA, who may just not be the countries experts on the subject, and who may not even be the best experts on birdsCrazy -
By:
blackbarn
When: 22 Feb 15 23:41
Thanks Emden, rabbit, squirrel and deer in season to eat, not sure I kill anything for fun, except perhaps Magpies and foxes.

Re pre-stunning, you can do your own research. Kenny quotes RSPCA, who may just not be the countries experts on the subject, and who may not even be the best experts on birdsCrazy -
By:
akabula
When: 22 Feb 15 23:47
Again you've posted rubbishing others claims without any counter claims.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com