Michael Jackson-Man in the Mirror

wouldn't have it in his top fifteen myself

couldn't understand how ,when he died , it came to be seen as the song that had to be played to commemorate him

actually imo it was that song that marked his decline as it pointed the way to stuff like Esrth Song

The irony.

Diana - the people's princess

MJ - the people's paedophile

The paedo is dead.  Move on.

Perfectly produced song - one of about half a dozen I've used over the years,
when testing audio equipment

horrible paedo.

Those still incredulous that MJ was not convicted of being a paedophile are usually those who given the same circumstances and opportunities would have molested children themselves.

They simply can not believe he could let such opportunities slip - given their warped thinking.

Pandora - most geniuses tend to be weird.  Normal people tend to be average.

Feb 15, 2015 -- 12:36PM, Poppydog. wrote:

Perfectly produced song - one of about half a dozen I've used over the years, when testing audio equipment

ok for you in your studio. some of us had to listen on a sony walkman

Those still incredulous that MJ was not convicted of being a paedophile are usually those who given the same circumstances and opportunities would have molested children themselves.

Hmmm.

Quite a leap of logic there, matey.

Jarvis Cockers lawyers will be in touch!

How can anybody ate these wonderful words, Basically he say if you want to change the world you need start  changing yourself:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljpl0neGk2Q.. great song. By the way he was never peodophile.

I'm Starting With The Man In
The Mirror
I'm Asking Him To Change
His Ways
And No Message Could Have
Been Any Clearer
If You Wanna Make The World
A Better Place
(If You Wanna Make The
World A Better Place)
Take A Look At Yourself, And
Then Make A Change

Think he was you know

Perfectly normal for a middle aged man to have non-familial boys over for a sleepover.

Nope he was no peodophile and neither was Jimmy Saville.

Guy the boy who accuse him withdrawal his accusation after he dies. Was he weirdo, yes, Had Low self esteem, Yes, never had normal childhood, yes. But could he hurt any other human being,, never proven conclusively. Anybody can accuse anybody of anything especially if you are rich and famous.

jackson a bogeyman......him and his big time cohorts kept his filthy secret hidden for years...

In the summer of 1993, Evan Chandler accused Michael Jackson of sexually abusing Chandler's 13-year-old son, Jordan. In January 1994 Jackson reached a financial settlement with the Chandlers to resolve the matter

scum father for taking the money and saying Fúck All.......i would still be beating him with a hammer, the peice of shít if he touched any of my kids...

The settlement payment was "for alleged personal injuries arising out of claims of negligence and not for claims of intentional or wrong acts of sexual molestation............yeah right

23 million reasons why he should have been found guilty


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/michael-jackson-paid-23million-buying-2011662

Secret FBI files exclusively seen by the Sunday People reveal Michael Jackson spent £23million buying the silence of at least two dozen young boys he abused over 15 years.

The documents – case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046 – were not passed on to prosecutors in the King of Pop’s 2005 trial, when he was cleared of molesting a child.

But they throw a disturbing new light on the megastar’s insistence he never laid a finger on any of the scores of kids he invited to his home for unsupervised sleep-overs.

Agents have thousands of pages of evidence dating back to 1989 indicating Jacko groomed and molested children – sometimes right under the noses of their starstruck parents.

The FBI files include private investigators’ reports, phone transcripts and hours of audio tapes.

They describe how the Thriller hit-maker was once caught by a member of his household staff groping a world-famous child star, watching porn films while molesting another boy and fondling the genitals of a third in his private cinema.

If you look at  accusation you can see that they were more or less after money. Myself i am not sure what transpire, if it was my kid i will never accept any payment to settle out of court. Wikipedia seems to indicate they were after money. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Michael_Jackson

Do we accept court judgement and fact that the guys decided to settle out of courts as evidence of no substantial evidence.

By the way Jimmy Saville was in entire different league, proven peod with 50 years history and massive file.The only reason he was not prosecuted is because he was protected by intelligence services.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/011805pltreqaseemd.pdf

^ list of items seized from this beasts house. not a paedo right enough.

never seen this before, why didn't they prosecute him (state of California) regardless of accuser position as it seems they have enough evidence to proceed.If this evidence was truthful.

good question bizman, and the answer is i have no idea .

so much Frankie Vaughan in the house, he barely had any space left for some furniture

This thread should have ended with tobermory's post.  He pretty much nailed it.  Used to like the album BAD as a kid, but man in the mirror was one of the most forgettable songs on it.

I knew he was a paedo the minute I saw he was using all that Apple gear.

No surprise to see the usual morons believing in guilt by accusations.

They are so dumb they have no problem having the tabloid media behaving as prosecution, defence, judge and jury.

I, like most intelligent people, prefer to leave allegations of wrongdoing to a court where all available evidence can be properly tested.

They describe how the Thriller hit-maker was once caught by a member of his household staff groping a world-famous child star, watching porn films while molesting another boy and fondling the genitals of a third in his private cinema.

Not only a paedo, but evidently he had three hands, maybe that's why he was rarely seen without at least one glove?

The difference between Jacko idolized as the ´King of Pop´ and Glitter seen as filthy paedo scum, is of course.....................
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

THE LAWYERS.

In your warped opinion of course.

I, like most intelligent people, prefer to leave allegations of wrongdoing to a court where all available evidence can be properly tested.

Lol

Shame Jacko hadn't got the same confidence that he would be acquitted.

2005, hth.

Furthermore, for the benefit of the dumb, an out of court settlement is not an admission of guilt.

Hth.

Methink he doth protest too much.

Not even a massive MJ fan.

I'm just old fashioned in that I believe everybody is innocent until proven guilty - in court.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Upp9OF9YlFI

Very credible witness.

Lets have a vote.  Is he telling the truth or lying?

Jack,

you just continue to show yourself to be a simpleton with little grasp of the law.

This interview was before his trial in 2005 so would have been in the public domain.

an innocent man doesn't need to pay people off. He was as guilty as fook.

horrible abnormal deviant with a penchant for seeking out kids for company, even going as far as building playgrounds and funfairs to attract them.

Music was shyte too

Disgusting that the BBC etc still play his music

Keep seething Emden, you seem very balanced and objective.

wesdag you are having a mare here.

If being impartial and objective is "having a mare", then I guess you're right.

As always.