Katie Hopkins - A Nasty piece of work

whatever, i dont even know who she is.

I dont care what people say, as long as its not horrible about something somebody else doesnt choose (skin colour, age, etc) then i dont care.

If she is being horrible about something somebody has chosen (to work with ebola patients, religion, football team) then its her choice, dones mean you have to agree

who is she anyway?

Dav_vin03, I was just joshing, Happy new year.

Dav

you clearly know who she is.

She has been extremely unpleasant on the net that rules the world.

that is it.

i fancy her

She's a very ugly woman with a very ugly soul.

Perhaps her physical unattractiveness is what's given rise to her unpleasantness.

She can hone her body to the nth degree but she can't change those features without a head transplant.

Who knows?

I certainly don't care - about her or any of her vicious outpourings.

She's a worthless human being.

Dav_vin03 i fancy her Speckkys for you in the new year

She is not worthless tt.

she maybe a c unt making something from it.

Plenty below her.

totally agree with you first line thou.

Ibrahima I meant in the actual sense, not the monetary one.

She can gain as much money as she likes - she'll always be a worthless human being to me.

so very true tt.

(cash & fame), she wont be happy.

Tommy, talking of souls........... what's the difference, between a woman coming out of confession and one getting out of the bath.








One has hope in her soul.






I'll get me Sacrament.

is she single? is she on tinder?

"Same mould as Frankie Boyle, no such thing as bad publicity"

Maybe not, but there are limits.  This poor nurse is paying a very heavy price for trying to do good as a volunteer health worker, and for Katie Hopkins to target her to make such a nasty comment was very vicious and spiteful...... but typical of the woman !  Feel sorry for her kids with her as a mother !

Controversial TV personality Katie Hopkins has criticised people who "dial the cop shop every time we feel offended online" after she was reported to police over her Twitter outburst about the Scottish nurse who is battling ebola.

Hopkins insists "the freedom to say only things that are polite is no real freedom of speech at all", in her Sun newspaper column today.

Hopkins was berated online after she wrote on the site about "little sweaty jocks", adding: "Sending us ebola bombs in the form of sweaty Glaswegians just isn't cricket."

In a separate message, she tweeted: "Glaswegian ebola patient moved to London's Royal Free Hospital. Not so independent when it matters most are we jocksville?"

Police Scotland confirmed they were looking into complaints they had received, but no report had been submitted to the Crown Office prior to the start of the New Year public holiday.

Writing in the English edition of the Sun, Hopkins said: "I have always maintained the Boys in Blue have far better things to do than police Twitter.

"But instead of argument, reasoned debate, discussion or avoidance, we now dial the cop shop every time we feel offended online.

"Since when did telling teacher ever solve an argument in the playground?

"The freedom to say only things that are polite is no real freedom of speech at all."

A very predictable response from her.

Of course she does not want the police to monitor Twitter otherwise her she would not get publicity for her racist and vile tirades.

But then again, she will probably be crying to the police when the first person threatens her or her family.

In fact, she already admitted she did complain to the police last year about trolls, but the police just told her to shut down her Twitter account if she was getting grief

"is she single? is she on tinder?"

no married. yes she's on tinder

Dstyle
this woman is an irrelevance, and there is nothing personal in anything she says. her comments are not targeted at the victims, i'm sorry to say that they are targeted at people like you

In a nutshell.

she just says stuff to get the plebs talking - it works.

think she is a vile person but i would defend her right to say the things she said........we need freedom of speech

I would disagree with that comment. Nothing personal? Was very personal with the nurse involved.
Her seaty jocks comment is water off a ducks 4rse to be honest but I do think she oversteps the line far too often.
Not surprised her column is in the sun either. Horrible vile cant of a woman.

cardifffc
think she is a vile person but i would defend her right to say the things she said........we need freedom of speech

Yes lets give everyone the right to say what they want when they want.
I am supposing that you think there should be no limits on freedom of speech. is that right?

as long as they dont incite violence.........i think what she said was  vile

The problem though cardiff that there has to be some limits on freedom of speech.
To me freedom of speech should not give you the right to be offensive.
Would you defend the right of someone to make offensive remarks at a funeral about the deceased?
Of course you wouldn't and that's why freedom of speech must have limits.

Boo hoo. She called someone a sweaty. I've got PTSD. I need three million. Wah wah wah.

Oh dear god. Now they want to outlaw people being offended. Stop. Breathe deeply and actually think where this is leading. Total and utter madness. You do not have a right not to be offended. I'm offended by your lack of tolerance of people who may cause offence that I think I should have the right to report you and have you banged up for life. After all if racism is predicated on the perception of the victim then surely my rights should be upheld as well. And where's my three million pounds? Wah. Wah. Wah.

A sign of her ignorance is sweaty is the rhyming slang ending in "sock" to rhyme with "jock", so to use part of the original rhyme and part of the original word is about as clueless as saying "Oi, Ricky, Answer the Dog and Phone will you". She's just a stupid attention seeking woman.

But I really don't like the way this country is going with seeming endless wasting of time and money chasing down idiots for saying silly things on chitter and chipping away at freedom of speech.

@Eeter Are you saying there should be no limits? A simple yes or no please.
BTW I don't think anyone is really that bothered with her sweaty jocks remarks but using this health worker, who could very easily die, to make her childish and stupid point was vile.

Another thing about her vile rant that has been overlooked is that the point she was making was wrong.
She made the point "Not so independent now" as we were having to send this potential ebola victim down south.
I made this point earlier but the nurse had to go to England as that is where the UKs only 'ebola special unit' is located.

No Akabula I don't think freedom of speech is an absolute but I think you have to think very carefully about where you curtail it and because weak people are easily offended isn't a reason for doing so in my view. I'd be releuctant to go much beyond inciting violence. Beyond that idiots deserve to have their views subject to scrutiny and ridicule.

As for the point I think there is quite a bit of unvented anger at the way some in the yes campaign behaved during the buid up to the indendence vote. If now those people have to take some back that is only fair. I don't think Hopkins' comments were directed at those who voted to remain part of the union but at this vociferous minority and after all what would life be if we couldn't take the pi55 out of each other. As an Englishman living in Scotland I am well capable of putting up with what some Scots dish out.

But her point played into the yes campaigners hands which is the group she was attacking.
We (ie Scotland) had no other option other than sending the nurse to England for treatment a point that went over Hopkins head.
TBH I don't think anything will come of the police interviewing her and it probably is a waste of resources but I'm glad if it cause her any inconvenience and discomfort. 
Although if they take their lead from the FA she'll get 6 months, poor Whelan.
I don't get the sun so don't read her column but I have seen her a few times on the breakfast show and wonder why they have her on.

I find your comments very worrying aka. That is a typical totalitarian authoritarian response. "You might not have broken the law but we don't like what you've said so we are going to harass you so you comply in future".

Do you really want to live in that kind of society?

I don't and remember it could be you they come for next.

But her point played into the yes campaigners hands which is the group she was attacking.
We (ie Scotland) had no other option other than sending the nurse to England for treatment a point that went over Hopkins head.

I haven't thought deeply about your point but she hasn't played into anybody's hands. The referendum has been and gone. If anything her point, if made at the time, was one in favour of better together I'd have said.

I find your comments very worrying aka. That is a typical totalitarian authoritarian response. "You might not have broken the law but we don't like what you've said so we are going to harass you so you comply in future".
Do you really want to live in that kind of society?
I don't and remember it could be you they come for next

FFS chill out it was a throwaway remark. toptalitarian authoritasrian response. I can't believe you typed that

As regards her remark about the nurse being sent to England for treatment you've missed the point yet again.
I was going to spell it out to you but it's late and I can't be ar5ed.

You can, but you can't spell.

toptalitarian authoritasrian response. I can't believe you typed that

I didn't but I wish I had.

Hopkins actually kind of has a point in a muddled way. Basically lets say this happened and Scotland was independent at that point. Would it have spent the money on a unit for something as specialist as this, duplicating something it previously had access to anyway, on the off chance it might happen for a small country? Perhaps not up the political money spend wishlist until it happens. So if this had happened would Scotland want to give the victim possibly inferior treatment at home or send them to the one in England if it is believed to be better. If the latter, would Scotland pay for it? Regardless of payment, would it not then be Scotland still using a UK resource, after the SNP (who wanted the independence) aggressively rejected the UK.

I'm guessing that's basically the point she in her obnoxious way, if she's trying to make any actual point at all of course, is trying to make, as EternalOptimist can see. A large problem here is that for some in England, despite the fact "No" won in Scotland, many see the likes of the EternallyObnoxious Salmond and his anti English rhetoric as the face of Scotland...

lol Taxi. In my defence I have impaired vision so don't see whole of word.

It's a facking sad state if there's only one suitable isolation unit in the whole of the UK.

Hoe much do they cost?

Our local hospital got a brand new MRI machine about 3 years ago, and they cost £millions.

She is not worth anyone's time

I don't see it like that JC. The facts are that there is only one specialist unit and it is in England.
Your point is speculation of what if and she was talking in the present tense only.
"Not so independent now are you" Nothing to do with anything other than having referred this nurse down south.

call me a taxi
It's a facking sad state if there's only one suitable isolation unit in the whole of the UK.

There are quite a few isolation units in the UK Taxi but because ebola didn't seem that great a threat (to the UK) only one centre was created to specifically deal with it.
Down south was the natural place for it given that most visitors from ebola infected regions come through the London area airports.

Well aka I think you can see what I'm trying to say, there is truth in it. I doubt there is only one isolation unit in the UK, she was isolated in Glasgow? The difference here is that it's very specialist treatment. In the US when someone was infected AFAIK they took them to their very specialist unit. If I was infected with something I'd want the best experts possible treating me, and I wouldn't want that f**ked up because some member of a nationalist movement wanted to politicse health and stick artificial boundaries on an island.

Down south was the natural place for it given that most visitors from ebola infected regions come through the London area airports.

And most of them stay down south.

I think the Hospital for Tropical Diseases is in London.

If that's in the hospital she's in, she'd better hope they do a better job on her than they ever did on University Challenge, or she's had it.

I know someone who's worked on the ebola virus for years.
Was a student girl who worked for me during the summer and she got a position at Liverpool Uni studying the virus.
We all wanted to hear more about it when we heard how deadly it was. That was 12 years ago so I'm assuming that the medical authorities must have managed to contain any previous outbreaks.

I do see the point you are making but I don't think that Hopkins is that clever.

Britain needs more people like Ms Hopkins, very astute on most matters.

Was a student girl who worked for me during the summer and she got a position at Liverpool Uni studying the virus.

It doesn't need studying.

The 'experts' on the BBC said that soap and water prevents it happening.

As the death toll when they said this was just under 3,000, and it's now over 7,900, either the 'experts' are wrong, or the people of Sierra Leone  are not using soap and water effectively.   

Perhaps they should ask their own govt for cash, soap ain't that expensive, and the govt seemed to have plenty of money for war.

She worked on the three most potent viruses know to man Taxi.
Don't know if she's still there or moved on but the research has continued.

Maybe we should send Ms Hopkins to Sierra Leone to advise them as she's seemingly very astute on all matters.

three most potent viruses know to man Taxi.

women
taxes
and
death

Not that keen on taxes, pretty much against death but women? No, I'd leave the women  out of your list and put immigration in their place.

I'd say she's astute enough if she's working freelance and getting all this publicity. She was on Jeremy Vine yesterday having done some stunt where she ate like a pig to put on four stones to then show how easy it is to lose it to stick it to all the cream cake munching fatties for seeking to excuse their sloth and I thought she came over far more considered that when she is acting like an agent provocateur. A couple of generations ago she wouldn't have been at all remarkable. We had legions of battleaxes up and down the country who were razor sharp and usually did good things in their local community. Sadly they were replaced not that long after with lazy empire building idiots who ate too many cream cakes.

akabula    03 Jan 15 01:56 
Not that keen on taxes, pretty much against death but women? No, I'd leave the women  out of your list and put immigration in their place



No akabula or ebola in Norfolk.

Well, I haven't read the last one-and-a-half pages, so apologies if somebody else has said this.

It seems that all this furore is about her description of 'Sweaty Glaswegians'. Personally, I see nothing wrong with that because the first symptom they check for is a raised temperature. I would guess that the next stage would be feverishness. This would lead to sweating, et voila...there is your 'Sweaty Glaswegian'!
This, obviously, would also apply to Scousers, Brummies, Geordies, Cockneys...in fact, ANYBODY who was stupid enough to return from ah infected area and not make DAMN SURE that they were Ebola-free.

It will be a fine thing if she has infected others, won't it?

Which seems to be the relevant point. It was a selfless act for which the nurse should be applauded to go and try to help out. It was totally selfish and stupid not to return to this country after the three or so week period which takes symptoms for the infected to show.

She can't have it both ways.

She says freedom of speech should be protected.

But then cries to the police when the trolls come after her on Twitter.

As for the point I think there is quite a bit of unvented anger at the way some in the yes campaign behaved during the buid up to the indendence vote

Legitimate sources and evidence please Eo.

There was plenty of evidence in the dailies of the lies and sh1t pushed by BT. They made headlines of Murphy's egging (ONE person, ONE egg), yet ignored the threat on Salmond's life and suppressed other stuff.

EternallyObnoxious Salmond and his anti English rhetoric as the face of Scotland...


Examples of "his anti English rhetoric" please.

Why the points about the woman being treated in London? Did she ask to go there? Who made the decision to send her? Maybe the NHS decided it was their responsibility, given her position and service.

There is one designated. UK Ebola treatment hospital. It is in London.

If the police approach her on this matter she should see her lawyers, possible compensation for Ms Hopkins.

She can't have it both ways.

She says freedom of speech should be protected.

But then cries to the police when the trolls come after her on Twitter.

Big difference between freedom of speech and threats against a person.

It's amazing how many people she manages to troll.

The sweatyjocks have always been a sensitive lot mind.

Alias

I think I've already pointed out to you that the race has been run. You're like one of those Japanese soldiers emerging from the jungle in the 70's. Give it up man.

Hamsterdam 03 Jan 15 12:55 Joined: 03 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 8,816 | Blogger: Hamsterdam's blog
She can't have it both ways.

She says freedom of speech should be protected.

But then cries to the police when the trolls come after her on Twitter.

Big difference between freedom of speech and threats against a person.

It's amazing how many people she manages to troll.

The sweatyjocks have always been a sensitive lot mind.



Errrr she was trolled and cried to the police, but the police told her to just get off Twitter if she couldn't take it.

She claims freedom of speech, but doesn't like it back. The poor lamb.

naydam   
03 Jan 15 10:47 
This, obviously, would also apply to Scousers, Brummies, Geordies, Cockneys...in fact, ANYBODY who was stupid enough to return from ah infected area and not make DAMN SURE that they were Ebola-free.

It will be a fine thing if she has infected others, won't it?

You won't find many  cockneys going to Sierra Leone, it's just like being at home, no holiday at all.

The nurse's condition has now deteriorated and her condition is now critical.

I wonder will Ms Hopkins be making a statement soon?

Hopkins is a bell-end who makes a living by being a bell-end, which appeals to other bell-ends. She is worth nobody's time.

I bet you'd shag her though.

G2D. All the more reaso0n why these people returning from danger zones should INSIST that they are checked thoroughly. They should also ensure that they, and everybody else concerned, understands the importance of adhering strictly to their safety procedures without exception.
Women like this nurse are just downright gung-ho and extremely dangerous. I also doubt very much if her present hospital can operate, without exception, to a strict safety regime.

the bell ends are the ones who are annoyed by her, she makes money from them

She was tested 7 times when she got back to Heathrow.

She told the testers she felt she had a fever but they said she was clear and told her to go home.

The symptoms of Ebola can sit in your body for 21 days before showing themselves.

Quarantine everybody who comes into the UK from any part of Africa.

NHS Can't afford it?

Not enough isolation units?

Fack 'em, put 'em back on the plane and stop all traffic from Africa.

Or send them all to Chester.

Chester's lovely :-) I'd rather we spent money on trying to save the life of a woman trying to do some good than those who live a life scrounging.

It must be lovely, Sibaroni lives there.

Better than Wolverhampton, where he used to live.

CMAT. I agree. If the symptoms can remain undetected for 21 days then any nursing staff should be quarantined for longer than that. Say 28 days. This quarantine should be served BEFORE they fly out and disperse to different countries.

We also need to teach these medical people how to maintain the strict discipline required to operate a safety procedure.

I've just watched the one on the BBC website showing how to put on and take off the necessary protective attire. They got it wrong!!

Jan 3, 2015 -- 4:28PM, naydam wrote:

G2D. All the more reaso0n why these people returning from danger zones should INSIST that they are checked thoroughly. They should also ensure that they, and everybody else concerned, understands the importance of adhering strictly to their safety procedures without exception.Women like this nurse are just downright gung-ho and extremely dangerous. I also doubt very much if her present hospital can operate, without exception, to a strict safety regime.

You disgusting inadequate piece of filth - "Women like this nurse" who the fck do you think you are? Scumbag.

C.S.E. English attained ^^^^

Phoned 111 yesterday, tooth abscess, after explaining my reason for calling (my dentist closed until Monday) I was asked inane questions completely unrelated to the condition, I knew exactly where the dopey bint was going with this, and it  was confirmed with the fckin unbelievable "have you been to or returned from West Africa, in the last 21 days. I snapped and said I haven't been to or returned from West Africa in the last fckin 21 years.

So now we have more useless call center tick boxes, to make it look as if they are on top of this, fckin useless c*********ts.

keep calm and carry on.

Dave1357. I think you are over-reacting to my post. I merely pointed out that she, and all the others who have been exposed to this danger, should insist that they are given the training, equipment and knowledge to work in these danger zones and to return home safely.
It's alright wanting to help, but without the necessary training, equipment and working practises in place these nurses are exposing themselves, their families and everybody else that they come into contact with. in danger of contamination.

I think you would have to agree that the systems and checks have failed her badly.

Alias

I think I've already pointed out to you that the race has been run. You're like one of those Japanese soldiers emerging from the jungle in the 70's. Give it up man.

And I think I pointed out before Sept 18th that no matter the result, the movement would continue. It has, it has gathered strength, and will progress.

"She was tested 7 times when she got back to Heathrow."

I know we can all look back with hindsight, but in the circumstances when she told them she felt unwell and also felt she had a fever, testing her 7 times and sending her home was a terrible mistake and failed her badly. Especially coming back from a danger zone.

Apparently that day they had 37 healthcare workers coming back and no extra staff on duty doing the checking procedures, so it was all a bit chaotic. And more like they were starting to get a bit complacent about the whole thing.

'not dangerous' the govt said.

'no need for panic' the govt said.

that was back when the death toll was just 3,000

Its almost 8,000 now.

I've taken no chances and cancelled my holiday to Sierra Leone.

Hey don't knock Sierra Leone, unlike you I think they've even mastered WIFI there

remember watching click a few months ago, they were in kenya and people were still using Nokia 3210's

Nokia 3210 was a good phone!
I've an android phone and yes the internet stuff is great but as an actual phone I think it's inferior to an old Nokia.

I used to play snake all the time on the nokia 3210 during college classes, happy days

I've two old nokias in a drawer, I wonder if the SIM works in it.
I wonder how long it'll be (if it's not already happening) before beardy hipster tw*ts start using them as a fashion accessory :)

Not a chance Alias. Dream all you like but Wee Jimmy Crankie is no Salmond. The stars aligned perfectly this year and still you got a whipping.

The stars? Now we know where you get your inspiration Eo.

A whipping? No, a result which would have been overturned by a mere 5.1% swing, and one which was achieved with the help of the corrupt, lying and "perfectly aligned" establishment and press, not to mention a little assistance from the ever respectable, "above politics" monarchy. Anyway, I'm sure you claimed to be a yes voter somewhere along the line, and it's not me you should advise to "give it up", I didn't raise Scottish politics on this thread. Look elsewhere to some arch unionists' posts.

Watched a programme where she put on 3 stone and then lost it to prove to the fatties that it can be done.

A lot of what she says is a wind up, but with regard to obesity, she does say some things that aren't popular and need to be said and there aren't many that have the guts to say it.

I did vote yes Alias but I haven't spent the period since whining and sobbing.

Eeternaloptimist


Alias
I think I've already pointed out to you that the race has been run. You're like one of those Japanese soldiers emerging from the jungle in the 70's. Give it up man.

Fantastic analogy.

I did vote yes Alias but I haven't spent the period since whining and sobbing

None of us have Eo. Lots happening and lots more to come.

akabula, why don't you stick to the prince Andrew thread and brown nose the royals a bit more?

only the looney left could complain and cry about someone for hateing, and then spend their time hateing that person.

some of you need to get out more.

Alias

akabula, why don't you stick to the prince Andrew thread and brown nose the royals a bit more?

God bless The Queen and your Emperor Akihito

apart from slippy has anyone met her

SEX on legs so f***able

she's on Celeb Big Bro

should be fun

Jan 7, 2015 -- 12:54AM, Capt__F wrote:

apart from slippy has anyone met herSEX on legs so f***able

Erm if you can find anywhere in chat chat Capt_F that I said I have met Katie Hopkins before I will courier you my entire wine collection free of charge. I never even knew who she was util a couple weeks ago old stick.

KH is going to make mincemeat of the two bimbos that have just gone in to the house

a "tattoo" model and

a woman who has spent £1m on plastic surgery (looks like she has been run over and the driver has then reversed back over her)