|
By:
I will be out so will have to catch up on it, I can see it being car crash.
Imagine Frankie Boyle stuck in the middle. They had a spat on twitter |
|
By:
BBC luvvies drooling into their Lattes as we speak.
Their big moment. Operation Destroy Nasty Nigel - the man who dares to challenge the Liberal Establishment. If Nige can get a word in edgeways, Brand is toast. |
|
By:
I bet the BBC have been struggling to find an audience sufficiently biased against UKIP and Farage for tonight's show.
Where's it coming from Poland? |
|
By:
How does Brandy stand on the EU and immigration?
He might be on the same side as Farage. |
|
By:
the papers are in for a hamering of brand go on russell give it to them
|
|
By:
Parklife
|
|
By:
Crippen,
Brand is mega pro-immigration. He believes we have no right to refuse entry to others as they are simply people who used to live somewhere else. The mans a plank. But we all know the audience will be stupidly loaded in the liberal luvvie funnyman who stands up for the underclasses favour. Hope Nige demolishes him. You'll know Farage is winning if Brand starts resorting to humorous but insulting put downs and snide remarks. |
|
By:
Farage the poor man`s Oswald Mosley.
|
|
By:
It is from Canterbury, the BBC will have to load this up, lots of UKIP support in the county and if there is one thing people from Kent despise then its a big mouthed Essex G!t
|
|
By:
Farage facing a more hostile audience than Rocky did when he went to Russia
|
|
By:
Farage will chew Russel Brand up and spit him out.
|
|
By:
Most of the blokes I know hate Brand with a passion, although he is a 100% t0sser I guess the fact that he did Katy Perry up the wrong un also has a bit to do with it.
|
|
By:
Thing is most qt audiences are full of political activists,lentil munching tattooed/pierced social workers,teecherz and coonts doing their 5th degree on the open university but have never worked,if you had a quid for every socialist workers party member in the audience since the start you would be a wealthy man.
The audience has no link to real life or the ballot box in may. |
|
By:
Farage will chew Russel Brand up and spit him out.
Peter Hitchens did that to Brand when them met on air, Brand just shut up after the first salvo. He found himself completely out of his depth with Hitchens, it'll be the same with Farage. Brand is a laughing stock, he's only on the show because he's a name. |
|
By:
Regardless of his politics Farage is known as a brilliant debater so it could be embarrassing for Brand. Look out for the "humorous" put downs and grins to the audience and you'll know Brand is on the ropes.
|
|
By:
he may not even turn up yet
|
|
By:
I've only ever known one person who's been part of the QT audience and flushgordon has described her to a tee
![]() Facking awful program. |
|
By:
This time next year, just like with the Nick Griffin and the BNP, it'll be Nick who? Ukip? they serve one purpose only and that's the put an immigration rocket up em' what else do they offer, what are they're other policies? - if you know I can assure you most people don't, they're a one trick party but they perform it very well.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Am I kidding myself, or was Question Time a pretty sensible politics program once upon a time?
I certainly won't be tuning into watch this one. |
|
By:
Too many different questions, there should just be one.
|
|
By:
Bit like the Oxford Union lfc1971? That doesn't strike me as your style.
|
|
By:
I suppose, but there is only one question that matters.
|
|
By:
Not sure what you meant History maker.
|
|
By:
The questions should not be changed until we get an answer, this would mean the same question might have to be asked for weeks or even years.
|
|
By:
what are they're other policies?
I've had a leaflet if you really want to know |
|
By:
He doesn't, sounds just like long lost Sibaroni.
|
|
By:
Not sure what you meant History maker.
Oxford Union debates lfc1971. Just one question, and two speakers, one for and one against. |
|
By:
See below, re Oxford Union. Bit more highbrow than Question Time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_Union |
|
By:
Yes I thought that was how it was...this is the mistake there should not be one for and one against.
Every question needs a scientific approach and there is a solution, the approach must be to find answers not to care about winning some silly debate...often the winner will be wrong, in any event the oxford approach is entirely what is wrong. |
|
By:
People are tired of being entertained, they are tired of debate, they want a mathematical approach and an attempt to find answers
|
|
By:
People are tired of being entertained, they are tired of debate, they want a mathematical approach and an attempt to find answers
I disagree. Wholeheartedly. What most people want is to think and feel that their lives will get better - they don't give two hoots about the approach, mathematical or otherwise, as long as they feel things improve. Blair understood that - people believed in him. Brown didn't. |
|
By:
It is important to be pessimistic and take as your starting point that things will get worse and not better.
Blair can not be seen as an overwhelming success. Then you look at things honestly. |
|
By:
People want someone to tell them not to worry because they will take care of them and lead them to the promised land of milk and honey.
|
|
By:
It is important to be pessimistic and take as your starting point that things will get worse and not better.
I'm just talking about how people are. How people actually think and how one might like them to think are two entirely different things. Wishing that wasn't the case is a lost cause. |
|
By:
Brand = C*ck.
I'll watch anyway but I'm sure he'll use lots of "big words" that convince stupid people he knows "stuff". |
|
By:
Only politicians should be on the show.
|
|
By:
.... that would rule Farage out
![]() |
|
By:
I agree that only politicians should be on the show. Question Time is a political programme. We all know that 99% of politicians are comedians, but Russell Brand is neither a politician nor a comedian!
|