His infamous "trial" was one of the biggest farces of all time, even when compared with some of the ludicrous nonsense brought before the courts today.
Here's the judge's summing up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyos-M48B8U
His infamous "trial" was one of the biggest farces of all time, even when compared with some of the ludicrous nonsense brought before the courts today. Here's the judge's summing uphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyos-M48B8U
norman scott bit the pillow and cried. as the late great manning said. if it had been Cyril smith on top of him, he'd have feckin swallowed it.
whatever happened to scott?
norman scott bit the pillow and cried. as the late great manning said. if it had been Cyril smith on top of him, he'd have feckin swallowed it.whatever happened to scott?
The night Jeremy Thorpe was acquitted of conspiracy to murder his alleged male lover in 1979, satirist Peter Cook delivered this sketch of Mr Justice Cantley’s summing up at the Secret Policeman’s Ball.
alun2005 04 Dec 14 16:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyos-M48B8U
The night Jeremy Thorpe was acquitted of conspiracy to murder his alleged male lover in 1979, satirist Peter Cook delivered this sketch of Mr Justice Cantley’s summing up at the Secret Policeman’s Ball.alun2005 04 Dec 14 16:48https://www.youtub
Takes me back down the paisley-lined corridors of time when such characters were described as "flamboyant". Well, not me matey. You can stick your thingee up ...
Oh, right ...
Different days.
Takes me back down the paisley-lined corridors of time when such characters were described as "flamboyant". Well, not me matey. You can stick your thingee up ... Oh, right ... Different days.
There's been a lot of predictable psychobabble in the media this last 24 hours or so about about "poor Jeremy, no-one would bat an eyelid these days about alleged gay relationships". THAT was NEVER the primary issue, and there was nothing like the amount of prurience about it at the time either in the media. The REAL issue was that here was a "senior" British politician was charged with "conspiracy to commit murder", a charge which Thorpe gave precisely zero evidence to deny in court, nor were any witnesses called upon to do so in his defence. Luckily for him, the ref was very much on his side for reasons we can only begin to imagine.
Don't be surprised if, now that the deceased can no longer sue for libel, we'll be learning a lot more about one John Jeremy Thorpe.
There's been a lot of predictable psychobabble in the media this last 24 hours or so about about "poor Jeremy, no-one would bat an eyelid these days about alleged gay relationships". THAT was NEVER the primary issue, and there was nothing like the am
Our lives are a desperate downhill bicycle race (with no brakes) until we reach blessed oblivion.
Beyond a certain age you're a winner. Having said that, Jeremy pretty much got what he deserved. And as for those Lib-Dems ... Bite the pillow ..
But do we care any longer?Our lives are a desperate downhill bicycle race (with no brakes) until we reach blessed oblivion.Beyond a certain age you're a winner. Having said that, Jeremy pretty much got what he deserved. And as for those Lib-Dems ..
@alun2005 re cover-up of attempted murder charge -- well, perhaps cover-up is the wrong word since he was charged and tried and it was in all the papers.
One complicating factor is that the charges against Thorpe were thought by some to be part of the plot by rogue MI5 elements to smear Harold Wilson. These were funny times, with some even talking of a military coup.
@alun2005 re cover-up of attempted murder charge -- well, perhaps cover-up is the wrong word since he was charged and tried and it was in all the papers.One complicating factor is that the charges against Thorpe were thought by some to be part of the