Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
dustybin
25 Nov 14 09:09
Joined:
Date Joined: 29 Dec 08
| Topic/replies: 32,058 | Blogger: dustybin's blog
After being hit in the head by a bouncer during a match.
Could be the end of the bouncer this, should be imo.
What has trying to take a player's head off got to do with the sport?
It's just licensed thuggery.
Pause Switch to Standard View Cricketer Phil Hughes critical
Show More
Loading...
Report rob_dylan November 25, 2014 9:12 AM GMT
SNAP.  Nothing wrong with the bouncer imo.  Is quite freaky for a serious injury in the days of helmets.
Report dustybin November 25, 2014 9:14 AM GMT
Yes Rob, but the wearing of helmets simply made umpires become less keen on stopping aggressive bowling.
I can't see how this is part of the game myself
Report rob_dylan November 25, 2014 9:24 AM GMT
It gets people scared and it gets people out.  Getting people out is quite a big part of the game.
Report lfc1971 November 25, 2014 9:27 AM GMT
Quite amazing when the first bouncer was bowled people didn`t say what the hell are you doing you
complete lunatic.
Report dustybin November 25, 2014 9:28 AM GMT
Throwing the ball instead of bowling would also scare batsmen and likely get em out but that's not allowed
Report lfc1971 November 25, 2014 9:43 AM GMT
Any serious injury resulting from a bouncer should have the possibility
of a jail sentence, possible manslaughter charges or worse.
Report kenny mann November 25, 2014 10:45 AM GMT
It's nothing these days compared with what the great Brian Close faced in 1976. Prepare to be amazed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-f5pfBgpNE
Report CLYDEBANK29 November 25, 2014 11:36 AM GMT
In 1976, the 45-year-old Brian Close was called up for the first three Tests in England's five-Test series against the West Indies,[30] who were no less ferocious than when Close was battered by them in 1963. In the second innings of the third Test at Old Trafford,[31] Close's final Test innings, Close opened with the 39-year-old John Edrich. Michael Holding, Andy Roberts and Wayne Daniel, a trio of fast bowlers, pounded them for two and a half hours. It was one of the most brutal displays of fast bowling ever seen. Wisden said, "Close and Edrich defended their wickets and themselves against fast bowling, which was frequently too wild and hostile to be acceptable".[32] Close himself said, "It must have been the worst wicket I experienced in Test cricket. The faster the West Indians bowled the worse it got because the balls broke through the surface of the wicket. They exploded and flew at you."[citation needed] With this innings of 20 runs off 108 balls in 162 minutes Close completed his Test career, under a vicious barrage, standing tall and taking the damage as he had against the West Indies at Lord's 13 years earlier.

After that, both Close and Edrich were dropped for the fourth Test. The interval between Close's first and last Test matches was 27 years, the second-longest after Wilfred Rhodes. Only one man, Zimbabwean John Traicos, has since played a Test match at a greater age
Report kenny mann November 25, 2014 11:50 AM GMT
45 years old and facing the fastest bowler ever possibly, without a helmet. He was a very tough cookie.
Report rob_dylan November 25, 2014 11:53 AM GMT
I've never played at that level but I can't help thinking that standing there and letting the ball hit you is not a very clever idea.  Close only averaged 25 with the bat.  Just seems common for yorkshire sorts to put the kind of willfully stupid behaviour that is standing there and letting a ball hit you up on a pedestal.
Report Velasquez November 25, 2014 11:58 AM GMT
John Conteh stopped his son from playing cricket because of the danger - recommended boxing instead...from a Parkinson interview.
Report dustybin November 25, 2014 12:48 PM GMT
no question you need a pair of stones to stand up to that sort of bowling.
The question is whether it should be allowed.
At present the rules are effectively that the bowler can attempt to take the batsmans head off once every six balls quite legally.
Since beamers are not permitted then nor should bouncers that only bounce 1 more time than a beamer
Report screaming from beneaththewaves November 25, 2014 1:42 PM GMT
Brian Close might have been a Yorkshireman, but at that time he was captain of the Somerset team that had turned Viv Richards into an international batsman.

Richards might have been playing for the W Indies in that game, but says that when Close was felled during that Old Trafford innings, he went over and anxiously enquired, "Are you OK, skip?"

"FOOK OFF!" came the reply.
Report Jack Hacksaw November 25, 2014 1:59 PM GMT
Remembering those amazing scenes with Brian Close - and with the Hughes injury…

Exciting though it may be for spectators, it does make you reconsider whether bouncers really should be part the game of cricket.

Maybe, the height of the wickets should be some clue.
Report Mr Eboue November 25, 2014 2:15 PM GMT
Getting a batsman out is not simply about bowling a good length ball.

A well bowled bouncer can put the element of surprise in a batsman. Fear even.

If you remove the bouncer the game is dead.
Report rob_dylan November 25, 2014 2:21 PM GMT
They could also prepare slower/less bouncy pitches.  All bowling, at its best, is great to watch when it is a real battle between batsman and bowler whether that be fast and short, line and length seam and swing, or spin.
Report dustybin November 25, 2014 2:39 PM GMT
the problem is ofc everyone has to bat at somepoint however bad you are at it
the same cant be said for bowling
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com