Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Try My Best
18 Oct 14 18:22
Joined:
Date Joined: 13 Aug 06
| Topic/replies: 5,286 | Blogger: Try My Best's blog
This time it's the head of Rotherham children services. Absolutely unbelievable. She should be facing a 20 years in the nick

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 7
By:
MadVlad
When: 18 Oct 14 18:42
^ Behave ffs did you used to read the NOTW ?
By:
Try My Best
When: 18 Oct 14 18:44
you agree with the payout then.
By:
MadVlad
When: 18 Oct 14 18:47
Well I know the head never abused any children if that's what you mean,but as always jo public want a scapeboat.
By:
MadVlad
When: 18 Oct 14 18:47
* goat ffs lol
By:
Try My Best
When: 18 Oct 14 18:51
Does she deserve 40k for not doing her job. Pretty simple question. Even that whiter than white individual Keith Vaz is horrified at the payment, yet again given to an individual in the public sector who is way out of her depth with regards to running a child protection dept.
By:
Big_Issue
When: 19 Oct 14 22:37
It's about 12 weeks money so basic redundancy, will hardly compensate for the vilification from the masses
By:
Big_Issue
When: 19 Oct 14 22:39
Cheaper than the cost of a dismissal, with likely ET appeals etc as per the London unfair dismissal case for the woman at Isliangton. Even if defended successfully would cost way more than 40K
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com