Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
call me a taxi
09 Oct 14 00:39
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Oct 03
| Topic/replies: 8,305 | Blogger: call me a taxi's blog
.
http://mommynoire.com/201292/whitewashed-16-pics-celebs-accused-bleaching/17/

The opposite of getting a suntan.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3
By:
Foinavon
When: 09 Oct 14 00:54
Lighter coloured skin is considered to be more attractive CMAT. Just don't get it myself. It's not a particularly good idea because long term use of bleaching agents can damage skin structure but people naturally want to be considered more attractive.
Look at all the money raked in by the cosmetics industry including cosmetic surgery and tattooing.
By:
call me a taxi
When: 09 Oct 14 12:30
Not by me, grow old and look old, like I was intended to do.
No tattoos either.
By:
History Maker
When: 09 Oct 14 13:43
Historically, it's actually the case the world over Foinavon, but not 'black/white', rather 'dark/pale'. Dark skin implies time spent under the sun working, whereas the elite didn't need to, and thus their paleness was a mark of their standing, much like obesity in some cultures.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com