|
By:
If you get 4 numbers then cross one out...simples.
|
|
By:
5 numbers up and you give them a tenner. Seems fair and teaches you not to be greedy.
|
|
By:
2 quid a go ...
|
|
By:
This can't be right at all if you are guaranteed 25 notes for 3 numbers, then those with 4 numbers must also be counted as they obviously have the required 3 numbers.
This could kill off the lottery once and for all if they don't rethink the payout structure. |
|
By:
2 winners share 700,000 odd, lowest ever?
lotto really have shot themselves in the foot.and serves them right! should at least make sure the lowest jackpot is 1m, it would be good 4 biz |
|
By:
5+Bonus £8k
![]() Thats a 2million:1 shot FFS ![]() |
|
By:
so glad these greedy k oon ts have shot themselves in the foot
|
|
By:
lottery = mug tax
![]() |
|
By:
A couple of years ago a fixed interest investment matured so (with interest rates almost zilch) I bought shed loads of premium bonds (my name, wife, kids, grandchildren) ... veiled I am rich and successful at Betfair & Bdaq point ... thinking I might, just might, win a biggie (maybe £5,000 or something). But no, every month floods of £25 prizes (well usually 10 or so). They fixed it so that everybody at sometime wins a prize - that's socialism for you!
|
|
By:
Last August the numbers of 'winning' Premium Bonds was greatly reduced.All were cut except the single £1M top prize.The greatest reduction was with the £50 and £100 prizes which were reduced to nearly one-third of their previous levels.The smallest reduction,of 6%,was to the £25 prize.
|
|
By:
Should have added that my wife wanted to buy a load when she got her lump sum from her pension but the Premium Bond returns are no better than the zilch rates from the Banks and Building Societies.
|
|
By:
Iamajambo
but it's tax free and you could win a million. (But I haven't) ... and the bank's rates only makes bankers richer. 0.5% on deposit, 10.0% car loan |
|
By:
mememe,
That's a fair enough point.The reason that last night's prizes were so pathetic was because all of the numbers were low,with people using birth dates,or some-such. I'm well aware that it's a 'tax on stupidity' but for me,and presumably everyone else,when you buy a ticket you're buying into a dream. Anyway,I used to do 2 lines for each draw(same numbers),one with mostly low numbers and one with mostly high numbers.When they put the cost up to £2 I ditched the low number line,which would have returned £25 last night,in favour of the high numbers.The other day 4 numbers paid over £200 on account of most being high.Of course,if everyone else did the same we'd get a situation where a high number draw would pay £15 for 4. ![]() |
|
By:
Iamajambo
I do the lottery ... birthdays primarily. Been doing it since it began... have years married as a number (24 in 1994). Wife daren't change it - should be now 44! Won a few £10s, nothing else. I consider myself intelligent (not sure anybody else does) and I make my living from Betfair/Bdaq, i.e. "gambling". But I still do the lottery with hopeless odds ... honestly I do think I'm intelligent. |