Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
11 Aug 14
11:05
Joined:
Date Joined:
05 Apr 06
Look at Headline....it says "burned alive", should read "buried alive"....
Such a serious subject....they can't be bothered to check it !
.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2721043/U-S-drones-fighters-carry-four-new-air-strikes-protect-stranded-Yazidis-attacks-Islamic-State-jihadists.html
Such a serious subject....they can't be bothered to check it !
.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2721043/U-S-drones-fighters-carry-four-new-air-strikes-protect-stranded-Yazidis-attacks-Islamic-State-jihadists.html
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 20
|
By:
Has now been changed.
. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2721043/U-S-drones-fighters-carry-four-new-air-strikes-protect-stranded-Yazidis-attacks-Islamic-State-jihadists.html |
|
By:
The last thing the Daily Mail concerns itself about is accuracy.
|
|
By:
Unlike papers like the Mirror Sun and Express of course. Or the Telegraph and the Guardian come to think of it.
|
|
By:
Facts 11 Aug 14 12:33
The last thing the Daily Mail concerns itself about is accuracy. WALOFS |
|
By:
USAF not renowned for concerning itself too much with accuracy!
|
|
By:
Guardian is a quality newspaper
|
|
By:
The Guardian is arguably the least bad newspaper. Definitely not a quality newspaper. The DM is toilet paper.
HTH |
|
By:
Rob
Which is a quality one in your opinion ? |
|
By:
None of them.
|
|
By:
Best thing about the guardian is the crossword, and the silly sods let you print it off the interweb for free so no need to buy the rag. Costs £1.60 a day now, no wonder it is losing money evey day, hand over foot. It is a lefty/labour paper and that is good because basically it is the only one (The MIrror is a comic). The DM/Express/DT need some kind of counter argument in the press. It is far from unbiased though, don't know the exact wording of the Scott Trust docs, but if they claim that the Guardian isn't biased (if not Labour biased than vehemently anti-Tory biased) then they are talking out their chocolate starfish.
|
|
By:
What about the one owned by the son of the KGB officer - The Independent?
|
|
By:
Thankfully, as if by way of atonement, if you scroll down the page you can see some pictures of ladies' bottoms.
|
|
By:
£1.60 a day
 |
|
By:
 Free of charge here. |
|
By:
I think your chick should visit the GP....... Screaming !
|
|
By:
Independent barely counts, sells about 60,000 a day I think. Seems slightly tabloidy to me these days too.
|
|
By:
^^^ Another Frank Maloney self publicity shot.
 Has he no shame? |
|
By:
the guardian comments section is very heavily modded- nothing gets through - they're worse than the nazi's the guardian lot
|
|
By:
^^^^ Correct
Been pointed out by moisok loads of times. |
|
By:
now the DM comments are not well modded, its a free for all - great entertainment reading some of the comments.
Usually A lot more interesting that the article itself |