Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Nasa have finally admitted that if you point the largest telescope you can get at the exact spot on the moon where Neil Armstrong planted the American flag you will not see it.
The reason they say is that the flag has turned white with radiation and can not be seen.
The reason they say is that the flag has turned white with radiation and can not be seen.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 32
|
By:
I believe them.
|
|
By:
The real reason that you can`t see it is because the Greys, who have a large base on the dark side of the Moon, ripped it down. NASA have since been warned to stay away.
|
|
By:
this is a change of reason .Their previous reason why no one could see it was because the light of the moon would reflect in the telescope.
They also said that the hubble telescope that can photograph stars 15 billion light years away would not be able to photograph the flag because hubble is only used for deep space,and the light of the moon would reflect off the hubble lens should they try it. Make your own judgement.  |
|
By:
What point are you trying to make, I seem to recall Buzz Aldrin chinned someone
equally impertinent! |
|
By:
He was 76 at the time.
|
|
By:
I can see it through my binoculars so they are talking rubbish.
Mind you my binoculars are of the expensive type and cost me nearly £15. |
|
By:
lfc1971 • July 13, 2014 1:23 AM BST
What point are you trying to make, I seem to recall Buzz Aldrin chinned someone equally impertinent! that it was all a fake, we never really went?? luckily akabula's £15 binoculars have saved the day, we did go  |
|
By:
Quite right!
|
|
By:
The commies didn`t like it, suspect Brassneck may be one.
|
|
By:
i am only quoting the latest news of the universe,and this is small news.the Big BREAKING NEWS is that a team of space experts have confirmed that the universe without a shadow of a doubt is still expanding and they can prove it.they will be doing some tests in the next few months with the data they have and will then announce with proof how the universe will end.all the space academies are believed to be in agreement that the results they have is big big news.
|
|
By:
The universe is flat, almost like a piece of paper.
|
|
By:
Although it is probably turned up a little at each end.
|
|
By:
Anything that tends towards infinity and is expanding must be flat.
|
|
By:
if i go to the edge of the expanding universe that is expanding into nothing and i stick my arm outside what is my arm going into.
|
|
By:
You won't be able to as there is a brick wall surrounding the universe.
That was what my big brother told me 55 years ago and I believed him  He was 10 years older than me and was obviously fed up with all my questions. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
We are not allowed to see the end of the universe, it must remain out of reach of the most
powerful telescopes because if we could we would know the answer to evertthing. This is why it could not be 220 miles..eg. |
|
By:
I think we are trying to see the start of the universe not the end lfc1971
The further we see in space the further we see back in time, because the universe is expanding So theoretically we should be able to see the big bang |
|
By:
and if light is the fastest traveller,surely one second after the big bang the light that was born would spring from the stalls and go quickly into the lead and then go well clear on the bridle(if you know what i mean)somy guess is that at the universes boundaries there must be great masses of light as it expands.
|
|
By:
how can you prove you cant see something that you cant see?
 |
|
By:
That sounds logical brassneck
tbh I only know what scientists say, I am not clever enough to necessarily understand it I only wish I could, but we must be born exceptionally clever to do that amazingly Bob scientists can |
|
By:
i cant see the wind but i know its there.
|
|
By:
you can feel it, you watch flags flying, an easier one that brassneck
|
|
By:
Bob the scientist can say anything. Who would know if it was true or not.
The big bang was at 11.34am 29 million years ago last Tuesday. Prove me wrong. Goodnight |
|
By:
Because the universe is infinite this means that it must contain every possible thing,
that means that somewhwere in space there must be someone identical to you.... reading this post. |
|
By:
well if light is not on front after the big bang,the laws of physics or science breaks down because the law says nothing travels faster that light.but nobody ever says this.
|
|
By:
Yes but everything in our universe, as far as we know, conforms to the same physical laws
although we may not completely understand them all as yet lfc |
|
By:
i hope he had a better day than i had on the horses.
|
|
By:
I award you this this years Nobel Prize brassneck, I cannot fault your logic
|
|
By:
but it is correct to guess this,if light was created last(caught in the stalls)it would make ground on all the other elements and take the lead full of running to shoot clear ,even if it was left a billion light years behind.
|
|
By:
im off to bobo land now,talk soon lads,good night.
|
|
By:
I will have a try brassneck, I am bored
Because of the time light takes to reach us, then when we see a star, we are seeing it at the time light left it. So the further we look out into space, we are seeing stars and galaxies in ever earlier stages of development. But there must be limit, because we would not be able to see anything before it was created would we? So we would eventually see nothing. Would we see the big bang itself..hmm, I shall sleep on that one??????????????????????????????? |