Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
naydam
07 Jun 14 09:53
Joined:
Date Joined: 31 Jul 04
| Topic/replies: 9,359 | Blogger: naydam's blog
The government have pledged to solve problems with primary school education "within a generation". Gove also intends to punish the parents of truants more heavily.

Well, it won't work. It won't work until such time as more entrants into primary school can actually speak English. And it won't work until such time as teachers and parents can actually administer proper punishment to kids who play truant against their parents wishes.

I cannot understand what the hell was ever supposed to be wrong with 'old-style' teaching and 'old-style' parenting.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 27
By:
call me a taxi
When: 07 Jun 14 10:45
On Matthew Wrights programme the other day 
(I like to watch so I can get myself into a foul mood for the day) Happy

He was talking about how percentage passes for exams are getting higher every year, and asked the inevitable question 'Are the youngsters of today a lot brighter than we were at school?'

He doesn't believe it, and neither do I. 

He then read out a question from an official maths exam paper.

'Listen to this question' he said 'and I kid you not, it's here in front of me. Are you ready....Write down twelve thousand four hundred and fifty, in numbers.'

And then he stared at the camera in disbelief. 

Then they went on to discuss the vast array of courses at Universities and Colleges.

Want an exam pass in sports?

Try this for a tough question from the exam, and he read it out:

'Old Trafford, the home of Manchester United, is a famous sporting venue. Name another one.'

This is what kids are passing as exams ffs.

If those two questions represent the level required for an exam pass, I should go to college and get myself a string of A's, and then put them where they deserve to be placed, which is on a facking bonfire.
By:
Ted Brogan
When: 07 Jun 14 11:04
Parents should be the ones punished more harshly for truancy imo.

Currently it is viewed as the school's responsibility to get the kids to school and they are punished by OFSTED if their attendance % drops below 95. This is absolute madness in my view.
By:
call me a taxi
When: 07 Jun 14 11:55
A lot of absences in primary schools, which I think will be a major part in the figures, are caused by parents who go on holiday during the school term. Given the way that thieving bastards in holiday camps and hotels put up all their prices in the 6 weeks summer holiday, this is hardly surprising.

Cheltenham and the surrounding areas do exactly the same when the Festival is on. If you want to stay, you have to pay.

Senior school absenteeism is a different story. I don't think that many parents take their kids on holiday in term time once they pass the age of 11.

You can only take your child as far as the school gates. Once they're in, you leave, and you hope they stay there all day. If they don't, that's the fault of the school imo, not the parent.

I played truant loads of times in senior school (1960s) but I always went to the correct class and got my 'mark' on the register first, then I'd vanish.

I'd get a bollocking from my form teacher the next day, but at the end of term my attendance record showed no absences, so my parents never found out.

Mind you, I went to a good school where everybody spoke English.

There were no such things as 'Teacher Training Days' like my daughters had in senior school in the 1990s, when their teacher went missing, and they got a teacher who knew next to nothing about the subject they were supposed to be learning. 'Read a book for 45 minutes' was the popular option by stand-in teachers.
By:
Ted Brogan
When: 07 Jun 14 12:19
"You can only take your child as far as the school gates. Once they're in, you leave, and you hope they stay there all day. If they don't, that's the fault of the school imo, not the parent"

A large number of parents (at secondary at least) don't take their kids to the gate and don't give a sh1t about getting their kids to school at all (largely, I believe, as a result of the school being held responsible).

My wife is a secondary school teacher and because the school had an 89% attendance rate, they got pulled up for it in their OFSTED inspection last year. As a result the school had to employ TWO PEOPLE whose job it is to go to the houses of skivers and drag them in to school. This is a total waste of time, resources and money imo.
By:
sideshowbob
When: 07 Jun 14 13:03
school is a waste of time for a lot of kids. instead of punishing them for not wanting to go, give them somewhere more suitable to go. most, if not all, kids who skip days are avoiding going cos theyre getting bullied or they arent learning anything so find it pointless. some cos the level of education is too high for their current abilities and some actually cos its too low.

i used to skip school all the time cos at 13 we were doing stuff id mastered at about 9 years old at my previous school. i wasnt on the streets mucking about, i was at home programming on my computer. i genuinely never learned anything at school from the age of about 12 onwards.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 14:18
kids are way cleverer now


the IQ averages around 130-140  these days

20 years ago it was 100

40 years ago it was 100

60 years ago it was 100
By:
sideshowbob
When: 07 Jun 14 14:20
100???? do me a lemon. thats a poor iq for a glass of water.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 14:24
105 then, allowing for the non triers
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 14:25
non tries


that looks like it's french  Grin
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 14:25
non triers *
By:
alun2005
When: 07 Jun 14 14:30
The British State Education System Miracle

Record Truancy, Record Numbers of Children who don't speak English as a first language, Record Violence, Record expulsions, Record numbers of experienced teachers leaving the profession in the last 17 years, and it's all produced the miracle of Record A-Level passes year-on -year.

And one of the benefits of this most "progressive" state of affairs is that we have record numbers of young 'Neets', as they have become known.

Can any other well-developed European democracy also match this envious (LOLOL) state of affairs?
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 14:38
90% of the population are effectively 'neets'

only 10% -if that, have ever put their exams to any use
By:
Mr.Anderson
When: 07 Jun 14 14:46
Coach, IQ scores aren't increasing any longer. Now they are falling. People are getting dumber.

"In the United Kingdom, a study by Flynn (2009) found that tests carried out in 1980 and again in 2008 show that the IQ score of an average 14-year-old dropped by more than two points over the period. For the upper half of the results the performance was even worse." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect)
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 14:56
Mr Anderson ,

Amongst adults though it is sky rocketing -  seriously !

I had my score come back at 20 points higher than one i did in 1988

Forumites on here average 150 according to their results, none lower than 130 for sure !   - and mates of mine who used to have average IQs in the 1980s  have taken the modern online IQ tests and have since recorded levels higher than Einstein - which proves Einstein wasn't all that imo.



Today's kids are mighty clever  - these exams and IQ tests don't lie
By:
lfc1971
When: 07 Jun 14 15:01
We are less intelligent today than people were 150 years ago. British people (and possibly America
and Europe) no longer invent anything, or write musi c, or even have any artistic ability. The less intelligent
are winning the evolutionary race.
By:
Mr.Anderson
When: 07 Jun 14 15:06
Sorry Coach, I don't have great faith in random online IQ-tests Silly
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 15:07
folk use their intelligence in different ways today

these days it's for making effective use of the benefits system - 50 years ago it was foir deciphering Shakespeare .

Somewhere along the line it  became apparent to the 'lowest sector' that there was no money to be gained from passing exams unless you were going on to great things  - so hence we have todays benefit culture .

Bet they can all work out fractions when it comes to buying their draw  Wink
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 15:08
Nor do I Mr Anderson  Happy
By:
sideshowbob
When: 07 Jun 14 15:34
iq tests are bollocks. i did one as a teenager and got a stupidly high score, 170 or summat. did that one on the tv the other year and got about 120. all depends on what kind of mood youre in. sometimes it all clicks, othertimes you feel like a total jellybrain and look at simple words and think "is that right? it dunt look right sumhoo" Plain

either way, you can have a high iq and not know sh1t. school teaches you pointless crap you dont need to know. when i was a kid i wanted to be a computer programmer, it was all i ever did in my spare time. i did do it for a job for a while but got burnt out really young. point is, how does learning who all the british monarchs were or the battle of hastings or speaking german hilariously badly help me in that goal?
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 17:09
'and not know sh1t.'

_______________
that can apply equally to a bright or stupid person alike  Wink
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 17:13
school is total bollocks anyway  agreed

if i listened to the teachers i wouldn't have ever gambled - as a result i would also be extremely poor and p1ssed off albeit with a decent insight into the life of former  Royals .

my history lessons were spend formulating gambling strategies and not learning about the French revolution - useful or not ?  you decide   Wink
By:
Coachbuster
When: 07 Jun 14 17:14
lives*
By:
sideshowbob
When: 07 Jun 14 17:20
eggsactly. if id listened to my teachers id be in a crap job all my life. instead ive vaguely run my own business for 15 years but made more out the bookies along the way. i always knew i was gonna do things my way, and instead of encouraging me all i got was "you need to stop fantasising and think about a career path" Plain

umm no, no i dont.
By:
sideshowbob
When: 07 Jun 14 17:38
i left school with no qualifications, never even took any exams. only went about 3 times from 14 to 16. did a degree in my late 20s but mainly for fun. im in my 40s but only had one regular job in my life, and that was only for about 2 years as a tutor/it support. apart from that ive just done my own thing the whole way, several business ventures...a bit of freelance work to tide me over etc.

some people just know they arent gonna be a regular 9-5er from an early age, but teachers and parents and whoever else cant understand that and think it means youre gonna be criminal or summat!
By:
naydam
When: 07 Jun 14 17:42
Ah! well. At that time they could have no way of knowing that you could join Betfair and carve out a career in moaning! DevilDevil
By:
Pandorica
When: 07 Jun 14 17:46
Interesting that he's aiming for a 100% literacy rate. According to the CIA World Fact Book it stands at the same rate now as it has stood since 1978 (and earlier).
ie. 99+ %
The man is just fcking clueless. In giving evidence to a Parliamentary Select Committee he said that all schools should be above average; an interesting concept.
By:
naydam
When: 07 Jun 14 18:18
Thats cos he never done em at scool.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com