A German documentary about 911.

I'm watching it.

It's very worrying.

the last german video i saw was on a smartphone, it was a vicar at the side of the road taking a dump, and several nuns enthusiastically lapping up his turds.

911 should have been called for sure, or its german equivalent.

Just finished watching this. It's the most disturbing video I've ever seen.

So what do you feel about the 9/11 Commission them Diva?

Do you think it was set up to fail. To cover up that the American/Israel elite had prior knowledge or in fact engineered the attack themselves?

Independent historians are still scratching their heads as they know that the 9/11 Commission report is a load of bull. It does not mention WTC 7 at all.

They are the ones who have actually read the report, held meetings with other independent researchers, scholars, engineers, architects, pilots and so on.

Lol at Clouseau, btw.

Ok thanks.

Diva

To be honest i have not read it and i did not expect you to have read it either.

My question was more of a general one regarding the 9/11 commission report. As the historians who have read it can`t accept it as factually correct.

The Daniele Ganser one is very professional and well balanced.

Mucho appreciated sir.

The 9/11 conspiracy is a completely debunked and idiotic notion, even Chomsky immediately dismissed it out of hand.
Some propaganda howlers in there too, like the Kennedy reference, either the germans have got less sophisticated at this over the last 80 years or they have very low expectations of the sophistication of their audience.
The US use false flags (Libya and Syria recently) but for fairly obvious reasons 9/11 wasn't one.

Good morning Polybot.

I am interested to see the phrase "completely debunked" in your post, sir.  I am a reluctant sceptic to the official explanation of the terrible events on that day, as I simply do not want to believe any parts of American federal government could be complicit in such heinous acts of mass murder. 

Much of what we witness on the internet is idiotic, as you say, but with reference to the collapses of WTCs 1, 2 and 7 I would contend that citing aircraft impact and the consequent fires as the primary cause of complete demolition is every bit as ludicrous as the bullshít propounded by the most ardent of tin-foil hat wearers one sometimes encounters online. 

The pancake or pile-driver failures reported in the 911 commission are not only scientifically impossible, they border on insulting when rationally compared with the video evidence.  There is very little doubt in my mind that all three building were imploded with carefully primed explosives.  And trust me, sir, if you could somehow dissuade of this belief I would be most grateful indeed.  As to who did it, how they did it and why they did it, I'll leave that to those more qualified to debate.

The 9/11 conspiracy is a completely debunked and idiotic notion, even Chomsky immediately dismissed it out of hand.

Chomsky is a social commentator. A historical/political guru of social climates. He is no expertise in building collapse, expertise of air traffic control, security defence or pilot ability.

Polybot why do you chose to ignore the hundreds of thousands of independent experts who still question the official line. The fact that you question nothing or at least throw up no questions suggests that you have already decided with no evidence that your mind is made up purely because of your perception of what is likely, and that THEY would not do it or allow it to happen to THEIR own people.

I don't know, AG.

I try to refrain from attributing blame to anybody.  I can certainly understand such speculation, of course, but I'm more comfortable sticking to scientific debate where possible.

If we suggest the building was tampered with which the scientific debate suggests if you oppose the official line.

Then attributing blame comes next.

Probably the most depressing and stupid points of views derive from those who see questioning the 9/11 Commission as pointless.

Of course we should ignore the scientific experts who oppose those appointed by the establishment.

"If so, perhaps you could point me in the direction of some solid proof suggesting otherwise."
That's like saying the tooth fairy exists because there's no evidence it doesn't exist, except a tooth fairy you could argue is an article of faith and potentially either metaphorical or  beyond human comprehension, office buildings however are not beyond human comprehension.
As for 9/11, it would take thousands of highly co-ordinated people to pull off something so risky and gave no direct link to Iraq, and in the probable event of failure or partial failure everyone involved would be imprisoned for life, and in the unlikely event it worked then someone would certainly leak it or blow the whistle.
Ask yourself, if it were even possible to carry out such a ridiculous James Bond type conspiracy, why would they? Especially when there were a million other options with little risk you could link directly to iraq. And if they would or could, then wouldn't the same "team" have simply planted WMDs in iraq after occupation?
What you are receiving is political propaganda, mainly because you're tuning everything else out.
Big buildings collapse when big things hit them, that's just the reality, look at the CTV Building, or was that also Bush? Wiring a building for implosion isn't something you do by sneaking into the building at night once the cleaners have finished their shift.

And no building can collapse straight down into its own footprint at freefall speed (WTC 7) or near freefall speed (WTCs 1 and 2) without the presence of explosives.

To be honest I don't know what to think.

Looking forward to reading my book from Amazon