Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
doantwin2easy
14 May 12 00:17
Joined:
Date Joined: 14 Aug 04
| Topic/replies: 6,934 | Blogger: doantwin2easy's blog
milllipede, ear wig, centipede, fly, wasp, dragon fly, frog, mouse, squirrel, duck, cat, pig, antelope, horse, elephant

where do you draw the line and why? me, i don't like to kill. we are all making our way in life.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 44
By:
sibaroni
When: 14 May 12 00:20
Its all about purpose.  Its probably less acceptable to kill an earwig because they are a bit icky, than to kill a cow to eat.
By:
doantwin2easy
When: 14 May 12 00:23
good point. i meant as an irritant and not for sustainance
By:
HRH The Lager Khan
When: 14 May 12 00:25
I hate wasps and I love elephants. This could change however if I found an elephants nest in my loft.
By:
Slippy Blue
When: 14 May 12 00:34
I could never harm a spider. Let them do their spiderman stuff in peace, for me.
By:
Mc Moonbeam
When: 14 May 12 00:46
for survival instincts imo .. threats & food

only thing i kill are wasps too
By:
treble
When: 14 May 12 00:54
Well I buy killed rats to feed my pet python. I find that quite acceptable. Just part of a food chain.
By:
CaptainScarlet
When: 14 May 12 00:56
Anything that flies except birds, bees, butterflies, and dragonflies are fair game.
By:
HRH The Lager Khan
When: 14 May 12 00:57
Especially Ryanair employees
By:
treble
When: 14 May 12 00:58
CaptainScarlet, Are you including bats in that statement?
By:
Mc Moonbeam
When: 14 May 12 01:10
would you kill rats to feed your python though ?

i hate both tbh .. no offence
By:
themuppet3
When: 14 May 12 01:15
treble
14 May 12 00:54 Joined: 17 Jan 08 | Topic/replies: 6,073 | Blogger: treble's blog
Well I buy killed rats to feed my pet python. I find that quite acceptable. Just part of a food chain.

If you caught and killed them yourself, that would be acceptable to me, however buying them already dead, well that's makes you worse than Joey Barton IMO............
By:
CaptainScarlet
When: 14 May 12 01:16
Treble please excuse my stupidity...bats are most definitely not included in my previous statement...I love bats.
By:
abolo
When: 14 May 12 02:37
All depends circumstances. I used to work with a guy who participated to the actions against integrists in Algeria, he had absolutly no regret for the men he killed, yet we unfortunately crushed a dog one day during a car patrol and he was devastated.
By:
BonVivvy
When: 14 May 12 08:34
Tbf i think only a tiny % ever really enjoy killing anything.Apart from wasps,flies,rats and foxes i'm at one with nature.It's always a bit sad when you run dogs over though but i do about 50k miles a yr so have to accept that as collaterol damage.
By:
GoOnThen
When: 14 May 12 08:45
Starting with Hague, Lansley and Hammond, as a warning to the rest of the cabinet to get their finger out, work harder and stop whinging,would seem perfectly acceptable to me.
By:
Java
When: 14 May 12 09:20
I don't like to kill anything, I even try to shoo a wasp out of the house.  However, I do support the death penalty for humans and would be happy to be executioner.  Very strange.
By:
Harry R Scrack
When: 14 May 12 14:29
I'm with Java. There's a difference between killing a wasp that's being a pain in the backside through instinct, and being executioner to a human who has done something evil through free will and choice.
By:
PatraTheCat
When: 14 May 12 14:45
I agree with Abolo in that the whole matter is entirely circumstancial. If someone told me he had killed a man who he had found torturing his parents I would find that more understandable than someone who just picked a mouse up off the ground and crushed it for no reason. The more advanced/intelligent the animal, I guess, the better the reason you need to kill it.

To kill something entirely gratuitously, I think you need to go down to the level of bacteria before it's OK. If I saw someone pouring boiling water over ants in a forest miles away from his home (i.e. not inconveniencing him in the slightest), I'd think he was a bit twisted. If I saw someone disinfecting a random bit of pavement for no reason I'd think he was weird, but not bad.
By:
Java
When: 14 May 12 15:40
"The more advanced/intelligent the animal, I guess, the better the reason you need to kill it. "

Why?  If a man kicks a dog to death the only reason that he doesn't get charged with murder is because humans have decided you can only get charged with murder for killing other humans.
By:
rogerthebutler
When: 14 May 12 15:56
Up to and including Piers Morgan for me
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 14 May 12 16:03
Personally, I try to coax a fly or a wasp out of the window
By:
Harry R Scrack
When: 14 May 12 16:28
On the Radio 4 show 'I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue' they have a round suggesting new meanings for words. Stephen Fry mentioned 'Countryside' as 'The act of Killing Piers Morgan' - I was reminded by Rogers 15:56 posting.
By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 14 May 12 16:30
Very good (R4 going down market?)
By:
PatraTheCat
When: 14 May 12 18:56
Java,

But don't you agree that that's the way it should be? I think unnecessary cruelty to animals is horrible, but it's not as bad as unnecessary cruelty to humans. More intelligent animals probably suffer more, for one thing. Kicking a dog to death should be punished less severely than kicking a human to death, but more than kicking a mouse to death (which would be very hard anyway) imo. People who kill spiders annoy me a bit, and I tell them off if appropriate, but it's not as bad as going out onto the street and shooting someone, surely?
By:
illuminatus
When: 14 May 12 21:37
Our troops (UK) have been attempting to ''Kill'' an endless Opium war for the last God knows how many years in Afghanistan. The Mainsteam Media revel in this.

Does that qualify as ''acceptable'' killing... or government 'policy'.

Reality does have a habit of biting.
By:
good value losers
When: 14 May 12 21:44
it's one of the great paradoxes of existence imo. anyone who has developed an iota of empathy will come to view life, all life, as sacred. yet when you look at the way the world is configured, clearly it is kill or be killed, nature red in tooh and claw.

most town and city dwellers are spared first hand exposure to the bloody slaughter, food arrives neatly sanitized and packaged. yet in order for you to live, something else has to die.

if there was a super being who set the whole thing up then i think s/he's a right cnt.
By:
The Leopard
When: 14 May 12 22:48
You are now on ze lizt...
By:
good value losers
When: 15 May 12 09:11
PatraTheCat     14 May 12 18:56 
Java,

But don't you agree that that's the way it should be? I think unnecessary cruelty to animals is horrible, but it's not as bad as unnecessary cruelty to humans. More intelligent animals probably suffer more, for one thing. Kicking a dog to death should be punished less severely than kicking a human to death, but more than kicking a mouse to death (which would be very hard anyway) imo. People who kill spiders annoy me a bit, and I tell them off if appropriate, but it's not as bad as going out onto the street and shooting someone, surely?



so let us suppose there's loads of planets with life, and it transpires we humans are way down the universal pecking order. you'd be ok with some super race coming along and squashing us like a bug?
By:
The Leopard
When: 15 May 12 09:46
Yes...where do you live...?
By:
Java
When: 15 May 12 10:03
"People who kill spiders annoy me a bit, and I tell them off if appropriate, but it's not as bad as going out onto the street and shooting someone, surely?"

Have you asked the spider his opinion?  Grin
By:
aman201
When: 15 May 12 10:14
if you rape someone and you see someone you know who walks past, and sees you raping her.

then you've got to kill said witness, so i guess in that situation yeah.
By:
The Leopard
When: 15 May 12 10:24
Why did you rape her...?
By:
aman201
When: 15 May 12 10:38
obviously cos of power and control.
By:
The Leopard
When: 15 May 12 11:03
Nothing sexual...?
By:
aman201
When: 15 May 12 11:32
i probably cummed on her.

it'll do yeah?
By:
good value losers
When: 15 May 12 13:28
when i read a series of posts like those it makes me question if all life is indeed precious Cry
By:
PatraTheCat
When: 15 May 12 14:55
Java and gvl,

Are you seriously suggesting that all non-vegetarians should be jailed for murder? If not, what exactly are you saying?

I've said that unnecessary cruelty to animals is horrible (so the same would apply to aliens who gratuitously wiped us out), but I think that most people, myself included, would rank humans above dogs above ants in just how bad we consider unnecessary cruelty to be.
By:
good value losers
When: 15 May 12 15:14
"Are you seriously suggesting that all non-vegetarians should be jailed for murder?"


where the fck did you get that from? Laugh don't put words in my mouth err posts. i never suggested any such thing.

i said the whole thing is a paradox that i don't understand. my example was an attempt to show it's all a matter of perspective, and that going down the road of one life is worth more than another is dangerous territory. what next? a white man's life is worth more than a black? a native born brit's life is worth more than an immigrant's? if you start categorising and valuing then there's no stopping it.

but i don;t have an answer, as i said it's a puzzle i don't understand.
By:
PatraTheCat
When: 15 May 12 15:45
OK, reading my post again it does look like I'm putting words in your mouth, so sorry about that. Personally I think more complex lifeforms should be valued higher but I guess it isn't as clear cut as all that.

By the way, a while back I accused you of not being able to pass the lipstick test. Since then I have often reflected that I should have put an exclamation mark afterwards, even though I don't use very many exclamation marks. It looked quite unfriendly without an exclamation mark.

I feel better now.

The question of evil in a universe ruled by a supreme being is an interesting one. I can't work out how much of a problem it causes for Christians and the like, since they can always invoke the "God works in mysterious ways" defence to reasonable effect, given the impossibility of second-guessing the motives of a being intelligent enough to design an entire universe from scratch.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com