We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
01 Feb 10
10:15
Joined:
Date Joined:
29 Aug 02
At this governments self-righteous stance on the Chandlers kidnap, " we will NOT pay any ransom demands" but they are perfectly willing to lavish money on Taliban terrorists though,if you are going to take a hard line on World lawlessness at least be **g consistant
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 15
|
By:
HA HA HA
By jove, you're right! |
|
By:
If you can't see the difference then I suggest that you get yourself a white stick and a dog.
|
|
By:
lady thatcher ouldnt have put up with this , shed have mobalised the r.a.f. , the navy and the sas, new labour spineless basderds
|
|
By:
I see two bunches of armed thugs making life difficult for the west,thoe with the loudest voices getting attention (I'd be here all day going through socio- political ,economic factors driving both issues but its all about sending the right messages and sticking to it consistantly)
|
|
By:
selina..the reasoning behind the recent summits conclusion on economic aid for the Taliban was that joblessness,poverty was a major factor in recruitment for terrorist groups ,I see parallels here.
|
|
By:
i recomend napalm followed by a good carpet bombing ,that will fk em
|
|
By:
Can't the government capture a few somalians from south London and offer the pirates a swap ?
|
|
By:
There is a Noel Edmonds gag in there somewhere.
|
|
By:
Much as I sympathise with their horrific plight,it was their stupidity which caused the problem We have service people doing a dangerous job in Afghanistan. Surely it's more important to ensure their safety and security and if educating and funding the Taliban to lay down arms and engage in some sort of dialogue will ensure a better outcome for all in Afghanistan including British service personel then that's the way forward.
The Chandlers are responsible for the awful situation they find themselves in, the British taxpayer did not force them to go on their journey against all advice, sailing through pirate infested waters.The taxpayer (or the majority of) will see no sense or value in paying a ransom when there's no chance of reimbursement so therefore it is financially a bad decision to even think about it.. |
|
By:
They'd get better financial rewards declaring open season on white westerners then,shooting them instead of kidnapping them
|
|
By:
RH, are you ok for a technical query on another thread please? It's been asked before but can't remember the answer.
|
|
By:
no probs mitch
|
|
By:
oh hang on, just remembered. have to go out soon, will ask later.
|
|
By:
thanks. :-)
|
|
By:
put my going out off, this is more important.
|