We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
27 Jan 10
21:17
Joined:
Date Joined:
16 Nov 08
since 9/11 i dont know of there being a single successful terrorist attack on American soil. Are they a bit sh1t?
Show More
to be fair they got about ten years worth in on that 1 day
they try to blow planes up . . but haven't quite mastered that yet either
considering these shadowy terrorists are supposed to be the greatest threat to our lives and freedoms they dont seem to do much
they don't need to do much. the fact that 'we' are still going after them proves they succeeded already.
It's not about a war on terror, it's about denying civil liberties to law abiding citizens by keeping them in fear.
Once the population is scared of a threat they've been conditioned to be frightened of, the government can take more control of everyday lives.
The threat is not terrorism but a global government and the loss of personal freedom.
Once the population is scared of a threat they've been conditioned to be frightened of, the government can take more control of everyday lives.
The threat is not terrorism but a global government and the loss of personal freedom.
we cant afford to stop looking for these b*stards,i dread the day they start looking for easy targets like schools because they are that insane.
sir dennis, you got that wrong mate, they crippled a superpower that day of 9/11 just a few ragheads in planes capable of creating mayhem, i still dont know how they got away with it tbh
We all know 9/11 was an inside job, set up by the Americans to justify their invasion of the middle east so they could justify their alterior financial related motives.
Anyone who takes in this war on terror propoganda nonsense is only being sucked in and subsequently cotrolled which is just the way the western governments wants it.
Anyone who takes in this war on terror propoganda nonsense is only being sucked in and subsequently cotrolled which is just the way the western governments wants it.
Hey, thats right, chit chat ain,t had a 9/11 thread for a couple of months now...
There are so many unanswered questions that act as blatant evidence that 9/11 was** But of course the Bush/Blair administrations would never lie to their public now would they?
Yeah definitely. Better than being any other plant or animal imo.
Who are the suckers here? The conspiracy theorists in my book
I've often thought that being a rather large stone wouldn't be bad.Plenty of time to think about it.
The suckers are those who believe what they are told to believe.
Ever watched Loose Change?
Ever watched Loose Change?
Conspiracy theorists believe what they are told to believe. How sad you people are
Dobbo do you want to try to answer the 10+ questions I can give you that blatantly expose the cover up of 9/11?
That's it just laugh it off. You are the equivalent of a Iraqi citizen who worshiped Saddam during his reign. Blinkered and naive.
It,s amazing how the government control these conspiracy theorists by putting out things like Loose Change ;)
Birchola,roll em out.I'd like to know how they knew just how to hit those mothers at the exact height and the exact angle.
OK here's my first point/question.
The attack on the Pentagon.
There was never any debris from a plane found at the site. The impact on the building was clearly not that of a passenger plane. It was a gaping hole. There were no impact points visible that would have been made by the wings of a plane.
Why have we never seen any video of the plane approaching the Pentagon? Surely one of the most secure buildings in the world would have hundreds of security cameras covering every angle. The fact is these were all removed and destroyed immediately after 9/11.
The attack on the Pentagon.
There was never any debris from a plane found at the site. The impact on the building was clearly not that of a passenger plane. It was a gaping hole. There were no impact points visible that would have been made by the wings of a plane.
Why have we never seen any video of the plane approaching the Pentagon? Surely one of the most secure buildings in the world would have hundreds of security cameras covering every angle. The fact is these were all removed and destroyed immediately after 9/11.
Building 7.
A 50 storey building that was undamaged during the attacks was demolished as part of a controlled explosion hours after the attacks on the twin towers. It just so happens this was a CIA building housing top secret information that the establishment didnt want to be discovered.
The controlled demolition was denied even though video evidence shows the detonation at the two main vertical points of the building.
Interviews have been carried out with staff who worked at the building where they admitted being called and told to get as far from the building as possible only minutes before it collapsed.
A 50 storey building that was undamaged during the attacks was demolished as part of a controlled explosion hours after the attacks on the twin towers. It just so happens this was a CIA building housing top secret information that the establishment didnt want to be discovered.
The controlled demolition was denied even though video evidence shows the detonation at the two main vertical points of the building.
Interviews have been carried out with staff who worked at the building where they admitted being called and told to get as far from the building as possible only minutes before it collapsed.
I could go on but unless you're willing to read both sides of the story you're only gonna take a biased viewpoint.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77
pentagon crash.
pentagon crash.
Exactly. That image shows an explosion and nothing else. Where are the missing frames of the supposed plane that made the impact?
This image is cleary not one of the impact of a plane but an internal explosion...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DF-SD-04-12734.JPEG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DF-SD-04-12734.JPEG
Flatliner -8 witnesses.Are we talking about a small hamlet here?
wouldn,t think many people would be hanging round the outside of the pentagon, just read wiki i don,t get involved with people,s OCDs.
lots of people saw 'a plane' flying towards the pentagon
but it wasn't in the direction /flight path in the official report & none of them saw it actually hit
but it wasn't in the direction /flight path in the official report & none of them saw it actually hit
Hey, I've been doing this for years. I don't pick my points, I just take the first.
'There was never any debris from a plane found at the site'
Substantiate this claim or admit you're lying.
'There was never any debris from a plane found at the site'
Substantiate this claim or admit you're lying.
with respect birchola it seems very odd that the US authorities would claim that a hijacked plane crashed into the pentagon when it fact there was a bomb blast. it would seem an impossibly difficult secret to keep!
No, Occams Razor, just how many people have got to be in on your fantasy for it to work?
There you go :)
There you go :)
if indeed it was a bomb surely they would just claim that the terrorists planted it rather than go for the plane line
Reason rarely applies here! I love the idea, oft posted here, that terrorists blew up the WTC and just kinda hijacked and flew planes into into it for the hell of it!
This thread will be deleted in 5 seconds. There never was a poster called Birchola. I know where you live.
The term 'no debris' was wide of the mark. Very minimal amounts were found. There was by no means enough that would constitute the remains of Flight 77.
Thatcher was quite happy to sink the Belgrano to get re-elected.Nothing is beyond the realms of possibility.
it is rather preposterous to claim that the US government would blow up the pentagon and then claim it was a plane strike. seems a very strange way of doing things...
Preposterous but possible. Personally I believe our governments will go far further than we dare to believe to get what they're out to acheive. We are mere numbers to them :|
My second claim is even more controversial. Scores of Americans protest at the site of the twin towers on a daily basis demanding answers for the controversy surrounding building 7
Doesn't sound very controversial to me, I'm fairly sure such people exist. Not sure if there are scores, but if someone like you is prepared to lie about the first point I questioned, all sorts of things could be possible. People can be both dishonest and gullible.
I offer this as evidence. Bearing in mind the authorities claimed in no way was the building purposely demolished...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4&feature=related
Watch from 4:10 minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4&feature=related
Watch from 4:10 minutes.
It is a youtube clip explaining why building 7 was a controlled demolition for no other reason other than to hide information stored inside.
Funny how an undamaged steel structure collapses with column implosions only seen under the circumstances of a controlled demolition. No coincidence it's the first of its kind ever.
n May 2002, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a report on the collapse based on a preliminary investigation conducted jointly with the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers under leadership of Dr. W. Gene Corley, P.E. FEMA made preliminary findings that the collapse was not primarily caused by actual impact damage from the collapse of 1 WTC and 2 WTC but by fires on multiple stories ignited by debris from the other two towers that continued unabated due to lack of water for sprinklers or manual firefighting. According to FEMA, structural elements were exposed to high temperatures for a sufficient period of time to reduce their strength to the point of collapse[
No mention of the obvious controlled demolition in the official government report. Hmmmmm.
No mention of the obvious controlled demolition in the official government report. Hmmmmm.
so someone else's claim then, sorry but given that the first was a lie, I'm certainly not going to waste my time on this. If you'd posted something yourself, with credible sources I'd have a look, but honestly, I've been doing this for yours and it's always just nonsense. You shouldn't just believe stuff you see on the internet!
'Someone elses claim'
I'm sorry but I wasnt there first hand to witness it myself. The video shows first hand video evidence. If you're willing to poo poo my argument then at least show the decency to watch and read the evidence before you.
Or you could just put both hands over your eyes and believe what they want you to believe.
I'm sorry but I wasnt there first hand to witness it myself. The video shows first hand video evidence. If you're willing to poo poo my argument then at least show the decency to watch and read the evidence before you.
Or you could just put both hands over your eyes and believe what they want you to believe.
What's wrong Sparkmaster? Afraid you may see something that affects your blinkered mindset?
To go back to the original post, what did Mock The Week Dara OBrein say ' When it has got to the point where i am been photographed in my underwear in airports, i rather think the terroist has won '
do you not remember a load getting killed at that army base?
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539