We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
cheers, oval
I'm sure I'll read it some time but at the moment I've not got the time. I'm not stuck on him being an agnostic rather than an atheist: there is evidence of both. I think the agnosticism may have been a late development. http://www.celebatheists.com/wiki/Carl_Sagan |
|
By:
I dislike the term atheist.
|
|
By:
oh you non-believer :-)
|
|
By:
Sagan was an infidel. Hope this clears things up. ;)
|
|
By:
huh?
|
|
By:
I could count myself in the agnostic camp as I ultimately don't know the answer but I'd rather call myself an atheist until I see the evidence for a higher being. You cannot sit on the fence and call yourself an agnostic, you either sway into one camp or the other.
|
|
By:
The term atheist does what it says on the sin.
|
|
By:
the prefix "a" has negative connotations. I prefer to refer to "theists" as suffreing from areason.
|
|
By:
I'm more comfortable with the agnostc label, personally. It seems to me that thinking that you don't, and possibly can't, know ultimate truth is a more logical position than stating for sure that there is no "God/gods" (whatever they are!?). But, like East Anglians, they are highly inter-related.
|