they should have nationalised the lot of them when they had the chance. how hard is it - lend at 4-5% above savers rates. the govt then could have got a return on the money it invested on the banks and made the whole situation more stable. i dont understand why any govt wouldnt want a cut of what the banks make.
but its a toss up between whos the more**- the government or the banks (who seem to be able to get judgement on anything they want).
welcome to britain, lads.
they should have nationalised the lot of them when they had the chance. how hard is it - lend at 4-5% above savers rates. the govt then could have got a return on the money it invested on the banks and made the whole situation more stable. i dont und
No, but neither are you if you're borrowing at 39%.
If you expect your income to increase, why not wait until it does before spending it? If you don't then it's a bit silly to borrow, but that should be obvious from the rate you're borrowing at.
yorky 04 Jan 12:48 lol, madismon are you living on my wage? No, but neither are you if you're borrowing at 39%.If you expect your income to increase, why not wait until it does before spending it? If you don't then it's a bit silly to borrow, but t
yorky 04 Jan 12:48 lol, madismon are you living on my wage?
That's an odd one! Your wage is inadequate to cope with your bills - so you borrow at crippling interest rates? No wonder we lead the world in debt crises!
yorky 04 Jan 12:48 lol, madismon are you living on my wage?That's an odd one! Your wage is inadequate to cope with your bills - so you borrow at crippling interest rates? No wonder we lead the world in debt crises!