|
By:
Just painted some random dog poo resting in the front garden for about a week now in a mild, palish blue. Giving it a push with a stick occasionally to give the impression it makes a little dance in the spot of the street light. Can even boost the effect by wearing your sunglasses at night. Great lil' fun!
|
|
By:
thanks hearts was thinking of going to see it over the festive period
|
|
By:
i went to see that end of the world film the other day 2012
it was not very good |
|
By:
i enjoyed it more than i thought
about the only 'fake' (i.e. cgi etc./3d) film I have found beautiful to look at, a feast on the eyes, some of dialgoue is bad and v cheesy but still a good film and worth seeing in 3d etc. |
|
By:
if dialogue is bad, then not worth watching
who cares about special effects? |
|
By:
Couldn't watch a film where the blatancy of relying on CGI effects comes out of every pore and makes the centre of the movie. Goes for most of today's stuff put on display. Not that you would ever believe what you're watching, but having even the smalles car crash looking like it's done with two painted sausage casings hurtling into each other completely prevents you from letting yourself into it. Am I the only one thinking that nearly every effect is overdone and clearly visible in today's films - apart from the fact they're taking over other crucial aspects, ie. dialogues?
|
|
By:
no you're not the only one as I have explained in my previous post
which is the reason why Star wars was very popular in the late 70s because of special effects, now it doesn't seem so good, all the star wars movies with liam neeson et al are all crap, in fact I only saw the phantom menace, it was terrible star wars was never worth watching anyway |
|
By:
3d? who cares....my life is in 3d
|
|
By:
worth a watch.
|