Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
canaryboy
26 Nov 09 22:13
Joined:
Date Joined: 11 Feb 04
| Topic/replies: 17,290 | Blogger: canaryboy's blog
ffs

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 31
By:
cdog
When: 26 Nov 09 22:16
oh ffs the only outcome that could have gone wrong :(
By:
Poppydog.
When: 26 Nov 09 22:16
Can what's happened be summed up briefly, please?
By:
tobermory
When: 26 Nov 09 22:17
yes explain

don't want to plough through 25 pages of all those seething euroloonies on that forum
By:
cdog
When: 26 Nov 09 22:17
Del Potro beat Federer 2-1 meaning it went to "games difference" which is the tennis version of goal difference. Del Potro had 45-43 and Muzza only 44-43 :_|
By:
thegame
When: 26 Nov 09 22:18
surely allows another bumping of the how many grand slams thread
By:
Five By Five
When: 26 Nov 09 22:18
quick summary
Andy murray could only go out if Del P won 2-1 against federer by 6-2 or 6-3 in final set...

DP won 6-3 :D :D Although did save 2bps in previous game which would have meant murray would be through...plenty of claims of f!x going on.
By:
canaryboy
When: 26 Nov 09 22:18
federer tanked the final set to send murray out

always knew he was a disgrace

was so obvious when he started double faulting and spraying everything out

fed had to lose 6-3 from 3-3 to send murray out
By:
a bitofinterest
When: 26 Nov 09 22:19
as deacon blue once said, "murray - he's a real gone kid" :^0
By:
canaryboy
When: 26 Nov 09 22:19
was an obvious**
By:
Poppydog.
When: 26 Nov 09 22:19
Thank you, you two
By:
canaryboy
When: 26 Nov 09 22:19
murray had no chance in tourny anyway
By:
Five By Five
When: 26 Nov 09 22:19
and certain people clearly lost some money despite most on the forum saying it was suicide backing Fed in a 3rd set when he had nothing to play for....
By:
a bitofinterest
When: 26 Nov 09 22:20
then why moan,you must have layed fed ffs
By:
Poppydog.
When: 26 Nov 09 22:20
you three
By:
Andy Murray
When: 26 Nov 09 22:20
fed **ed to knock murray out, was clear as anything
By:
cdog
When: 26 Nov 09 22:20
if it had been 6-4 in the final set would it have gone to head to head, meaning Murray would be through?
By:
canaryboy
When: 26 Nov 09 22:21
no 6-4 would have put potro out on games
By:
jimmy69
When: 26 Nov 09 22:21
The idiots didn't realise that Federer had a huge bonus to play for if he won all his matches this week and also he wanted Murray through not del Potro because he realises that Murray is cannon fodder unlike the Argie.
By:
Andy Murray
When: 26 Nov 09 22:21
if it went to 6-4 murray would be through thru games won/lost percentage
By:
canaryboy
When: 26 Nov 09 22:22
i think
By:
Five By Five
When: 26 Nov 09 22:22
Was fed **ing when he had the 2bps to go 4-3 up??? those points didnt look like someone who was f!xing it... after he lost that game yes 1 way traffic...
By:
tobermory
When: 26 Nov 09 22:22
so if Fed had lost the last set 1-6 or 4-6 Murray went through , but 2-6 or 3-6 Murray out? ?:|
By:
Five By Five
When: 26 Nov 09 22:22
Still Delp will give much better viewing for rest of the tournament.
By:
Five By Five
When: 26 Nov 09 22:23
yes tober.
By:
canaryboy
When: 26 Nov 09 22:23
yeah maybe h2h

ffs had enough of tennis today now lol
By:
alun2005
When: 26 Nov 09 22:23
Why didn't Andy Murray just beat Federer from a 1-0 set lead, and hammer Verdasco to improve his set and game winning ratio?
By:
Five By Five
When: 26 Nov 09 22:23
because he's a whinging mug.
By:
jimmy69
When: 26 Nov 09 22:24
If only tennis was simple Alun...
By:
a bitofinterest
When: 26 Nov 09 22:24
rome KNEW
By:
Five By Five
When: 26 Nov 09 22:24
http://twitter.com/andy_murray

:D
By:
tobermory
When: 26 Nov 09 22:25
ty

that is just about the stupidest qualification criteria i have ever heard of
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com